I just got a 6 months old mail to this list and wondered for a while why
it happened. Looks like the old dovecot.org was rebooted and Postfix
went up and started sending queued mails. So just ignore if you got
those.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Webmail.us will be sponsoring my Dovecot development for this summer.
Other companies are also welcome to participate in the costs.
Participation gets you:
- listed in Credits in www.dovecot.org
- listed in AUTHORS file
- you can tell me how you want to use the feature and I'll make
sure
On Nov 28, 2007, at 5:51 PM, snowcrash wrote:
p.s. The folks at AT&T also recommend that "you" use the newer
version
of gcc than the older-hacked-to-get-something-for-Tiger version of
the
Apple Leopard version they (AT&T) are providing -- it is further down
the page where they provide links
> p.s. The folks at AT&T also recommend that "you" use the newer version
> of gcc than the older-hacked-to-get-something-for-Tiger version of the
> Apple Leopard version they (AT&T) are providing -- it is further down
> the page where they provide links.
just looked at the page & have no idea what
fair nuf. my point simply is, the check should make sense --- or at
least be documented. and the email was just an fyi.
personally, i can work around it ...
cheers.
On Nov 28, 2007, at 1:39 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--
Message: 7
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 10:38:19 -0800
From: snowcrash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] 1.1beta9 'make' fails on osx/Tiger
To: "Jerry Yeager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: dovecot@dovecot.org
Mes
on 11/28/2007 10:49 AM jflowers spake the following:
I may be sorry I brought this up. There's nothing wrong with your TXT record.
This server acts as a virus/spam processor for mail relayed from a legacy
server (for historical reasons). It filters with MailScanner/SpamAssassin.
Looking thro
Hello,
M. Fioretti pisze:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 10:14:31 AM -0800, Marc Perkel ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> >Everyone has different opinions on the usefulness of SPF, but the
> >reality of it is, DomainKeys solves the entire problem. SPF
> >doesn't.
>
> I second that. I've wasted a lot of time
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 10:14:31 AM -0800, Marc Perkel ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> >Everyone has different opinions on the usefulness of SPF, but the
> >reality of it is, DomainKeys solves the entire problem. SPF
> >doesn't.
>
> I second that. I've wasted a lot of time with SPF and it's useless.
On 2007-11-28 10:29:26 -0800, snowcrash wrote:
> > the real solution would be to copy the config.rpath [1] from your distro
> > into the source dir. this requires the gettext devel files to be
> > installed.
>
> i'm not using nls/gettext. afaict, it's not even mentioned (in
> configure, doc, INST
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt wrote:
>> But as a matter of fact, I got corrected. The major problem with even
>> scoring is that the only things spammers have to do (and they really do
>> it!) is to register some new domain, enter valid SPF records for it and
>> then their sco
on 11/28/2007 10:46 AM Matt spake the following:
But as a matter of fact, I got corrected. The major problem with even
scoring is that the only things spammers have to do (and they really do
it!) is to register some new domain, enter valid SPF records for it and
then their scoring might even impr
I may be sorry I brought this up. There's nothing wrong with your TXT record.
This server acts as a virus/spam processor for mail relayed from a legacy
server (for historical reasons). It filters with MailScanner/SpamAssassin.
Looking through the SpamAssassin debug code, it checks my relay as
> But as a matter of fact, I got corrected. The major problem with even
> scoring is that the only things spammers have to do (and they really do
> it!) is to register some new domain, enter valid SPF records for it and
> then their scoring might even improve.
DKIM and domainkeys are really no bet
on 11/28/2007 10:08 AM Udo Rader spake the following:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rick Romero wrote:
On Nov 28, 2007, at 11:26 AM, Dean Brooks wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 11:06:40AM -0600, Matt wrote:
Your spf record is broken:
dovecot.org.39942 IN TX
(Yes, Really w/ gcc v4.2.1, like i said in the first place)
> Actually, the 1.1 beta v9 builds just fine under Tiger (PPC and
> PPC64) if you use the official Apple sanctioned gcc v 4.01 they ship
> with both Tiger and Leopard. If you do download and use gcc 4.2.1 from
> the GNU folks you mi
> the real solution would be to copy the config.rpath [1] from your distro
> into the source dir. this requires the gettext devel files to be
> installed.
i'm not using nls/gettext. afaict, it's not even mentioned (in
configure, doc, INSTALL, etc) as an option. then, gettext shouldn't
be a requi
On Nov 28, 2007, at 12:08 PM, Udo Rader wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rick Romero wrote:
On Nov 28, 2007, at 11:26 AM, Dean Brooks wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 11:06:40AM -0600, Matt wrote:
Your spf record is broken:
dovecot.org.39942 IN TXT
Dean Brooks wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 11:06:40AM -0600, Matt wrote:
Your spf record is broken:
dovecot.org.39942 IN TXT "v=spf1 a -all"
Care to tell also why? dovecot.org's mails are sent from the same IP as
its A record.
Hmmm. I would have li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rick Romero wrote:
>
> On Nov 28, 2007, at 11:26 AM, Dean Brooks wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 11:06:40AM -0600, Matt wrote:
> Your spf record is broken:
>
> dovecot.org.39942 IN TXT "v=spf1 a -all"
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 11:45:29AM -0600, Rick Romero wrote:
> >>One thing that bugs me is why we must now implement domainkeys on top
> >>of SPF. SPF pretty much does everything domainkeys does but simpler.
> >
> >Because SPF is a broken hack that doesn't properly accomodate the
> >forwarding of
On Nov 28, 2007, at 10:59 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Message: 8
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 07:49:13 -0800
From: snowcrash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] 1.1beta9 'make' fails on osx/Tiger, but OK on
osx/Leopard (multiple definitions of symbol _hash_create)
To: "Timo Sirai
On Nov 28, 2007, at 11:26 AM, Dean Brooks wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 11:06:40AM -0600, Matt wrote:
Your spf record is broken:
dovecot.org.39942 IN TXT "v=spf1 a -all"
Care to tell also why? dovecot.org's mails are sent from the same
IP as
its A record.
Hmmm.
> > One thing that bugs me is why we must now implement domainkeys on top
> > of SPF. SPF pretty much does everything domainkeys does but simpler.
>
> Because SPF is a broken hack that doesn't properly accomodate the
> forwarding of email without the use of other complicating hacks
> such as SRS w
(Dean, sorry you'll see this twice...I forget that the Dovecot list,
unlike every other list I'm subscribed to, does not "reply to list" by
default...)
Dean Brooks wrote:
> Everyone has different opinions on the usefulness of SPF, but the
> reality of it is, DomainKeys solves the entire problem.
On 2007-11-28 08:47:14 -0800, snowcrash wrote:
> on fresh 1.1.beta9 source, it fails @
>
> ./autogen.sh
> ...
> 100%[>] 154,427
> 115.09K/s
>
> 08:45:56 (114.82 KB/s) - `wiki-export.tar.gz' sav
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 11:06:40AM -0600, Matt wrote:
> > > Your spf record is broken:
> > >
> > > dovecot.org.39942 IN TXT "v=spf1 a -all"
> >
> > Care to tell also why? dovecot.org's mails are sent from the same IP as
> > its A record.
>
> Hmmm. I would have listed mx as
On Nov 28, 2007, at 11:06 AM, Matt wrote:
Your spf record is broken:
dovecot.org.39942 IN TXT "v=spf1 a -all"
Care to tell also why? dovecot.org's mails are sent from the same
IP as
its A record.
Hmmm. I would have listed mx as well but thats just me. But just
l
> > Your spf record is broken:
> >
> > dovecot.org.39942 IN TXT "v=spf1 a -all"
>
> Care to tell also why? dovecot.org's mails are sent from the same IP as
> its A record.
Hmmm. I would have listed mx as well but thats just me. But just
listing a is likely better in that t
11/28/2007 7:17 AM Jim Flowers spake the following:
Your spf record is broken:
dovecot.org.39942 IN TXT "v=spf1 a -all"
--
Jim Flowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Checking to see if there is a valid SPF record.
Found v=spf1 record for dovecot.org
v=spf1 a -all
evaluating...
if i run
autogen.sh
on fresh 1.1.beta9 source, it fails @
./autogen.sh
...
100%[>] 154,427
115.09K/s
08:45:56 (114.82 KB/s) - `wiki-export.tar.gz' saved
[154427/154427]
> it was not. now that _you've_ mentioned it, i'll try it and see.
fyi ... this looks better, now.
setenv LDFLAGS "-L/usr/local/db46/lib -L/usr/local/sqlite/lib
-L/usr/local/mysql/lib/mysql -L/usr/local/lib"
setenv LIBS "-liconv"
setenv SQL_LIBS "-lsqlite3"
setenv CPPFLAGS "-I/usr/local/db46/inc
> That's why libraries shouldn't be added to them, only linker flags.
agreed. which i would have done if SQL_LIBS had been mentioned in
"./configure --help" output. adding to LIBS had not worked ...
it was not. now that _you've_ mentioned it, i'll try it and see.
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 08:30:41 +0200
Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 16:54 +, Daniel wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:49:01 +0200
> > Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 2007-11-25 at 13:39 +, Daniel wrote:
> > > > Using the latest cv
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 07:49 -0800, snowcrash wrote:
> > I think as a user it's a lot easier to use and understand if you're just
> > instructed to say:
>
> > CPPFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include LDFLAGS=-I/usr/local/lib ./configure
> >
> > instead of:
> >
> > ./configure --with-mysql=/usr/local --with-sq
> I think as a user it's a lot easier to use and understand if you're just
> instructed to say:
> CPPFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include LDFLAGS=-I/usr/local/lib ./configure
>
> instead of:
>
> ./configure --with-mysql=/usr/local --with-sqlite=/usr/local
> --with-pgsql=/usr/local --with-ten-other-packages=
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 16:34 +0100, Mark Heitmann wrote:
> >
> > >/ It looks like your LDAP library is just returning a wrong file
> > />/ descriptor, and there's nothing I can do about that in Dovecot's side.
> > />/ Use OpenLDAP instead.
> > /
> > Looks like someone else has found this too:
> >
>
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 16:30 +0100, Laurent PELLISSIER wrote:
> Timo Sirainen a écrit :
>
> > These happen only if you're trying to use Dovecot from inetd. Do you
> > really need it? I'd suggest running dovecot directly, it works a lot
> > better and most likely gives better error messages as well.
>/ It looks like your LDAP library is just returning a wrong file
/>/ descriptor, and there's nothing I can do about that in Dovecot's side.
/>/ Use OpenLDAP instead.
/
Looks like someone else has found this too:
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do;jsessionid=868c93415e3b4b73aa32fe63eb730?bu
Timo Sirainen a écrit :
These happen only if you're trying to use Dovecot from inetd. Do you
really need it? I'd suggest running dovecot directly, it works a lot
better and most likely gives better error messages as well.
I run it (compiled by myself) from the command line in the foreground
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 11:17 -0400, Jim Flowers wrote:
> Your spf record is broken:
>
> dovecot.org.39942 IN TXT "v=spf1 a -all"
Care to tell also why? dovecot.org's mails are sent from the same IP as
its A record.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed mes
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 16:08 +0100, Laurent PELLISSIER wrote:
> dovecot: Nov 28 15:43:53 Error: IMAP(lavande): Error: Dovecot is already
> running with PID 4369 (read from
> /opt/dovecot-1.0.8/var/run/dovecot/master.pid)
> dovecot: Nov 28 15:43:53 Error: IMAP(lavande): Fatal: Invalid
> configurat
Your spf record is broken:
dovecot.org.39942 IN TXT "v=spf1 a -all"
--
Jim Flowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 07:04 -0800, snowcrash wrote:
> > Doesn't it have -lmysqlclient at all?
>
> on this box, yes, it does:
..
> > Should I just add another
> > -lmysqlclient_r check and use it if -lmysqlclient isn't found?
>
> you can add a conditional ... but, imho, you need the option to
> _s
(agh! bounced ...)
> Doesn't it have -lmysqlclient at all?
on this box, yes, it does:
ls /usr/local/mysql/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient*
/usr/local/mysql/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient.15.0.0.dylib
/usr/local/mysql/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient.15.dylib
/u
> Problem was that it was reading a 50MB mail in 12kB blocks, and Dovecot
> wasn't handling that very well. Fixed:
>
> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.0/rev/0fba164c6ba6
> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.0/rev/edd95f9c6ba4
That's awesome! Thanks so much Timo, you always come through!
I'll inst
Hi,
I'm trying to test Dovecot as an IMAP ans POP3 server but I ran into a
fatal problem.
On the client side (telnet) I'm trying very basic IMAP commands :
$ telnet localhost imap
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1).
Escape character is '^]'.
* OK Dovecot ready.
> Doesn't it have -lmysqlclient at all?
on this box, yes, it does:
ls /usr/local/mysql/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient*
/usr/local/mysql/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient.15.0.0.dylib
/usr/local/mysql/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient.15.dylib
/usr/local/mysql/lib/m
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 09:26 -0500, Adam McDougall wrote:
> Last night I enabled imap_quota so dovecot could report usage reported
> by disk quota. I don't intend to actually use the quota plugin to place
> any limits anytime soon though. How much overhead does this add to
> normal operations tha
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 06:18 -0800, snowcrash wrote:
> perl -pi -e 's/AC_CHECK_LIB\(mysqlclient,/AC_CHECK_LIB\(mysqlclient_r,/g'
> configure.in
> perl -pi -e 's/mysql_lib=\"\-lmysqlclient \-lz
> \-lm"/mysql_lib=\"\-lmysqlclient_r \-lz \-lm\"/g' configure.in
Doesn't it have -lmysqlclient at all? Sho
Last night I enabled imap_quota so dovecot could report usage reported
by disk quota. I don't intend to actually use the quota plugin to place
any limits anytime soon though. How much overhead does this add to
normal operations that allocate disk space? Ideally I'd like a situation
where the on
hi timo,
> > it's _not_ broken on Leopard, it was "broken" on Tiger
>
> Oh, interesting. I guess I won't add this workaround to Dovecot sources
> then. People have been building Dovecot on OSX for a long time and
> no-one's complained about this before.
so have i ...
but, i'd gather they've _not
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.8.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.8.tar.gz.sig
+ Authentication: Added "password_noscheme" field that can be used
instead of "password". "password" treats "{prefix}" as a password
scheme while "password_nosc
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 15:55 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 14:41 +0100, Mark Heitmann wrote:
> > > + if (conn->fd <= 3)
> > > + i_error("LDAP returned wrong fd %d", conn->fd);
> > > i_assert(conn->fd != -1);
> > > net_set_nonblock(conn->fd, T
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 14:41 +0100, Mark Heitmann wrote:
> > + if (conn->fd <= 3)
> > + i_error("LDAP returned wrong fd %d", conn->fd);
> > i_assert(conn->fd != -1);
> > net_set_nonblock(conn->fd, TRUE);
> > }
>
> Okay, with the little debug patch, this ist the
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 10:22 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>/ On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 09:10 +0100, Mark Heitmann wrote:
/>/ > pollsys(0x08099448, 11, 0x08047B10, 0x) = 1
/>/ > fd=5 ev=POLLIN|POLLPRI|POLLERR|POLLHUP|POLLNVAL rev=0
/>/ > fd=7 ev=POLLIN|POLLPRI|POLLERR|POLLHUP|P
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 10:22 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 09:10 +0100, Mark Heitmann wrote:
> > pollsys(0x08099448, 11, 0x08047B10, 0x) = 1
> > fd=5 ev=POLLIN|POLLPRI|POLLERR|POLLHUP|POLLNVAL rev=0
> > fd=7 ev=POLLIN|POLLPRI|POLLERR|POLLHUP|POLLNVAL r
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 12:00 +0100, Andre Hübner wrote:
> i use Dovecot 1.0.7 for pop and imap on Suse Linux 10.1. I need a little
> help in understanding something.
> If i want to create a folder with outlook express or thunderbird which can
> also create subfolders, then i have to create these
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 11:18 +0100, Netskin | Corin Langosch wrote:
> Now I have to use a cifs mounted maildir directory and found it to be
> quite slow,
> though I already tuned it a lot. The only way to get it fast was to put
> INDEX and
> CONTROL files on the local disc and so outside of the ma
Hello List,
i use Dovecot 1.0.7 for pop and imap on Suse Linux 10.1. I need a little
help in understanding something.
If i want to create a folder with outlook express or thunderbird which can
also create subfolders, then i have to create these folders with a trailing
slash.
folders created
Hi!
I'm using dovecot for a while now and really like it. Actually dovecot
1.5 on
Debian AMD64.
Now I have to use a cifs mounted maildir directory and found it to be
quite slow,
though I already tuned it a lot. The only way to get it fast was to put
INDEX and
CONTROL files on the local disc
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 09:10 +0100, Mark Heitmann wrote:
> pollsys(0x08099448, 11, 0x08047B10, 0x) = 1
> fd=5 ev=POLLIN|POLLPRI|POLLERR|POLLHUP|POLLNVAL rev=0
> fd=7 ev=POLLIN|POLLPRI|POLLERR|POLLHUP|POLLNVAL rev=0
> fd=1 ev=POLLIN|POLLPRI|POLLERR|POLLHUP|POLLNVAL
Mark Heitmann wrote:
>>/ >>/ Did you compile with Solaris's own LDAP library or with OpenLDAP?
/>>/ />/ I'm using iPlanet DS and Solaris's LDAP library.
/>>/ /
/>>/ People have had different kinds of problems with Solaris LDAP
/>>/ library. You could try if OpenLDAP works better.
/>/
/>/ I hav
63 matches
Mail list logo
