On Jan 11, 2008 11:51 AM, Marcello Nuccio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I use http://freshmeat.net/projects/imapproxy/ for that.
> works fine.
>
Agreed, its instant drop in persistence a must have.
--
Gabriel Millerd
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 11:43 -0700, Andrew Falanga wrote:
> Unfortunately, I used as an example, mbox and MAILDIR to make my point.
> Perhaps this was a bad choice because I felt this same frustration in
> reading other areas of the wiki. It wasn't that the information was bad, or
> unusable. I ju
Il giorno ven, 11/01/2008 alle 06.16 +0200, Timo Sirainen ha scritto:
> On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 15:19 -0700, Aria Stewart wrote:
> > >
> > > OK, let's try to get a bit more on topic and go back to the original
> > > question of what's a good webmail client for Dovecot?
> > >
> > > We went with Pray
On Jan 10, 2008, at 9:16 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
So I wrote my own.
http://dinhe.net/~aredridel/projects/ruby/camping-at-the-mailbox
Missing screenshots. :)
http://dinhe.net/~aredridel/projects/ruby/camping-at-the-mailbox-screenshots
Cheers!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
timo, thanks for the patch.
Timo Sirainen wrote:
| On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 12:28 +0200, Evaggelos Balaskas wrote:
|> I use the allow_nets password extra field [0] for my users. Is there a
|> way to use this functionality for ALL users, and not to edit
On Jan 11, 2008, at 4:50 AM, Chris Wakelin wrote:
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 1/10/2008, Timo Sirainen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
No-one mentioned WebAlpine yet, which also uses persistent
connections. I haven't tried it myself though.
I though this is what imapproxy did for webmail? We only ha
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, Andrew Falanga wrote:
In the future, I shall endeavor to look more heavily for the answers before
posting, or at least before assuming that no one on this list is willing to
help. Thank you to all for the help given.
Sure thing. If you have suggestions to improve the wik
on 1/11/2008 10:43 AM Andrew Falanga spake the following:
Hi everybody,
There are a few things that I think I need to explain. Far too many people
gave me feedback after my remarks about the dovecot wiki for me to answer
all individually. At first, I must admit to some prideful need to lash ba
Hi everybody,
There are a few things that I think I need to explain. Far too many people
gave me feedback after my remarks about the dovecot wiki for me to answer
all individually. At first, I must admit to some prideful need to lash back
for not being understood. This however, would be totally
Greg Troxel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [dovecot closing connections to gnus, making gnus fail to exit group]
>
> I use gnus and I think that the closed connection happens to me once in
> a while. gnus just reopens it - I'm running the head of Gnus CVS. So
> this feels like a gnus bug.
I d
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 11:59 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 1/10/2008, Robert Tomanek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I can confirm RoundCube ( http://www.roundcube.net/ ) is a good
> > recommendation.
>
> Can you confirm that it uses persistent IMAP connections? I can't tell
> from the websi
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 1/10/2008, Robert Tomanek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I can confirm RoundCube ( http://www.roundcube.net/ ) is a good
recommendation.
Can you confirm that it uses persistent IMAP connections? I can't tell
from the website or searching the mail archives or forum...
On 1/10/2008, Robert Tomanek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I can confirm RoundCube ( http://www.roundcube.net/ ) is a good
recommendation.
Can you confirm that it uses persistent IMAP connections? I can't tell
from the website or searching the mail archives or forum...
--
Best regards,
Char
hmm...
in my special case a user misses a lot of mails. i do not believe in dovecot
problem (1.0.10)
There were some other connects with same ip...
For more information a counting of really transfered mails would be nice.
only flagged mails are not very interesting. Mails should be counted if t
[dovecot closing connections to gnus, making gnus fail to exit group]
I use gnus and I think that the closed connection happens to me once in
a while. gnus just reopens it - I'm running the head of Gnus CVS. So
this feels like a gnus bug.
On 11.1.2008, at 16.23, arvids wrote:
just tested with the latest hg(740a17139b67) - removed the whole
mail directory,
then sent two mails, then retrieved them with POP3, then repeated
sending and
retrieving. After each step cache file was updated(both after
deliver and POP3 session).
Here
On Friday 11 January 2008 15:37:51 Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Hmm. Not here, at least with latest hg..
>
> export MAIL=~/Maildir
> rm -f ~/Maildir/dovecot*
> printf "list\ntop 1\nretr 1\ndele 1\nquit\n" | ./pop3
> ls ~/Maildir/dovecot*
> /home/tss/Maildir/dovecot.index.log /home/tss/Maildir/dovecot-ui
On 11.1.2008, at 16.03, Claus Atzenbeck wrote:
What does "Missing IMAP reply key: F" mean?
No idea. Rather set auth_debug=yes on Dovecot's side and look at the
logs.
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Here is my litte script:
#!/bin/bash
# find all domains
for domain in /var/mail/*; do
if [ -d $domain ]; then
# find all accounts for each domain
for user in $domain/*; do
if [ -d $user ]; then
subscriptionfile=$user/mail/subscriptions
Hi all:
I installed dovecot v1.0 (on Mac OS X) and want to connect to is on
localhost via Pine or Alpine, but it fails. Pine's debug mode tells me
the following:
~~
Debug output of the Pine program (debug=2 debug_imap=4). Version 4.64 (OSX)
[...]
Te
On 11.1.2008, at 15.30, arvids wrote:
On Friday 11 January 2008 06:02:12 Timo Sirainen wrote:
The point of that was that v1.1 just doesn't create/update
dovecot.index.cache files for POP3-only users. There's no need to
configure it that way. I'll try to update the wiki to say that. :)
then it
On Friday 11 January 2008 06:02:12 Timo Sirainen wrote:
> The point of that was that v1.1 just doesn't create/update
> dovecot.index.cache files for POP3-only users. There's no need to
> configure it that way. I'll try to update the wiki to say that. :)
then it seems that there is some problem -
On 1/11/2008, Mike Brudenell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I can confirm that webmail software that uses persistent IMAP
connections is a big win: it not only lightens load on the webmail
server machine but also, more importantly, on the IMAP servers.
It doesn't come out and say one way or anoth
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 13:36 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Chris Wakelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Last time I looked at it, imapproxy cached authentication (but so can
> > Dovecot!) but not SELECTs (i.e. opening a mailbox), which is why I wondered
> > how useful it would be.
>
> ## enable
* Chris Wakelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Last time I looked at it, imapproxy cached authentication (but so can
> Dovecot!) but not SELECTs (i.e. opening a mailbox), which is why I wondered
> how useful it would be.
## enable_select_cache
##
## This configuration option allows you to turn select c
Mike Brudenell wrote:
Whatever you do, DON'T move to Maildir if you are using the Prayer
webmail software!
We have used Prayer here for many years with the UW IMAP server backend
and first Berkeley, then later MBX, format mail folders.
When we migrated new users to Dovecoe with Maildir fol
On Friday 11 January 2008 05:25:41 Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 14:37 +0100, Daniel wrote:
> > On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 11:11:44 +0100
> >
> > Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > I'm using latest hg from the 1.1 branch, and noticed that since
> > > yesterday's updates,
Hi folks,
I'd like to throw in some real world experience: my IMAP server runs for
just a few users, but they have huge maildirs (>1GB each) with hundreds
of folders and, in some folders, thousands of messages.
Before switching to dovecot, courier-imap handled the backend and I used
Squirr
Greetings -
On 10 Jan 2008, at 21:49, Chris Wakelin wrote:
With Dovecot's caching and indexing, things are much better, but
there is still a significant overhead on opening lots of
connections, I fear, especially for mboxes (moving to maildir would
help of course). I would consider using i
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 10:03 +0100, Andre Hübner wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> i'm looking for a way to increase log-level for imap-processes. Pop3 Server
> writes all necessary infos about mails-transfered/deleted etc. Imap-Log
> writes just times and ip's of Userlogins.
> Is there a way to increase
Timo Sirainen, on 1/11/2008 6:54 AM, said the following:
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 06:42 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 1/10/2008, Timo Sirainen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
No-one mentioned WebAlpine yet, which also uses persistent
connections. I haven't tried it myself though.
I though this is
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 06:42 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 1/10/2008, Timo Sirainen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > No-one mentioned WebAlpine yet, which also uses persistent
> > connections. I haven't tried it myself though.
>
> I though this is what imapproxy did for webmail?
It makes connec
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 1/10/2008, Timo Sirainen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
No-one mentioned WebAlpine yet, which also uses persistent
connections. I haven't tried it myself though.
I though this is what imapproxy did for webmail? We only have one or two
people who actually use ours (Squirre
On 1/10/2008, Stephen Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
This can be pretty easily solved - configure your web server to
require HTTP authentication for the location where the PHP script is,
configure the web server to use the same authentication source as
webmail, and hack webmail to pick up th
Stephen Warren wrote:
Peter Eriksson wrote:
All the suggested ones have just one big FAT problem - they are all
written in that security bug ridden language that the hackers just
love to exploit - PHP. Running a web application available to the
whole wide internet written in PHP is just asking
On 1/10/2008, Timo Sirainen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
No-one mentioned WebAlpine yet, which also uses persistent
connections. I haven't tried it myself though.
I though this is what imapproxy did for webmail? We only have one or two
people who actually use ours (Squirrelmail), so it isn't an
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 12:24 +0100, Richard G Riley wrote:
> Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 17:21 +0100, Richard G Riley wrote:
> >> I have a connection to my dovecot server from gnus:
> >>
> >> ,
> >> | (add-to-list 'gnus-secondary-select-methods
> >> |
Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 17:21 +0100, Richard G Riley wrote:
>> I have a connection to my dovecot server from gnus:
>>
>> ,
>> | (add-to-list 'gnus-secondary-select-methods
>> | '(nnimap "hermes"
>> | (nnimap-stream starttls)
>
On giovedì 10 gennaio 2008, Peter Eriksson wrote:
> All the suggested ones have just one big FAT problem - they are all
> written in that security bug ridden language that the hackers just love
> to exploit - PHP. Running a web application available to the whole wide
> internet written in PHP is ju
On giovedì 10 gennaio 2008, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> It is the best webmailer I've found. You give it a try.
I do not agree sorry, I found horde a very huge collaboration framework and
IMP (the hosrde webmail component) is too much bounded to the rest of the
framework ... I think that if you
Hello List,
i'm looking for a way to increase log-level for imap-processes. Pop3 Server
writes all necessary infos about mails-transfered/deleted etc. Imap-Log
writes just times and ip's of Userlogins.
Is there a way to increase the imap-output? The Conf-Parameters i found did
not really fit m
41 matches
Mail list logo
