Hi!
Using HEAD, and after the 7193:e5af14239137 changeset (Store physical
message sizes also to dovecot-uidlist if needed.) I'm getting this:
(gdb) bt full
#0 0x0a0a80dd in kill () from /usr/lib/libc.so.41.0
No symbol table info available.
#1 0x0a0e04a7 in abort () at
On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 09:13 +0100, Daniel wrote:
Hi!
Using HEAD, and after the 7193:e5af14239137 changeset (Store physical
message sizes also to dovecot-uidlist if needed.) I'm getting this:
Hmm. I tried a few ways and couldn't get it to crash.
#3 0x1c0741cb in i_panic (format=0x3c000100
On Saturday 26 January 2008 09:34:22 Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 09:13 +0100, Daniel wrote:
Hi!
Using HEAD, and after the 7193:e5af14239137 changeset (Store
physical message sizes also to dovecot-uidlist if needed.) I'm
getting this:
Hmm. I tried a few ways and couldn't
On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 09:45 +0100, Daniel wrote:
This is the assert message in the error log:
file maildir-mail.c: line 336 (maildir_mail_get_physical_size):
assertion failed: (mail-data.virtual_size != (uof
f_t)-1)
Thanks, committed a fix.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
On Saturday 26 January 2008 09:47:22 Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 09:45 +0100, Daniel wrote:
This is the assert message in the error log:
file maildir-mail.c: line 336 (maildir_mail_get_physical_size):
assertion failed: (mail-data.virtual_size != (uof
f_t)-1)
Thanks,
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Wouter Amsterdam wrote:
L.S.
It is not clear to me why I should use namespaces or symlinks to share a
single maildir mailbox with multiple users. Why not configure multiple mail
clients with the same account information?
Assuming your users also have non-shared email
It is not clear to me why I should use namespaces or symlinks to share a
single maildir mailbox with multiple users. Why not configure multiple mail
clients with the same account information?
Well, since by using the latter, you would introduce some kind of security
breach. What happens when
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 06:59 -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
If I use the socket option I can't use the count option to create more
authentication processes. I get this error. Thanks in advance.
dovecot: Jan 25 06:57:04 Error: auth(default): Socket already exists:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 06:59 -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
If I use the socket option I can't use the count option to create more
authentication processes. I get this error. Thanks in advance.
dovecot: Jan 25 06:57:04 Error: auth(default): Socket already exists:
On Jan 25, 2008 11:44 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, the issue was that SOMETHING is enforcing /var/log/dovecot-lda/log
size! I was able to get this working by rotating, and the solution
will be to constantly rotate, but I still need to figure out what's
enforcing this.
Check ulimit
current version : 1.0.rc15
Hi,
I would just like to know if it's possible to have different mail
locations for different UNIX users, using pam authentication and the
passwd userdb. We also have some virtual users using an SQL db.
The current config is :
auth default:
username_translation: %@
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I use userdb_mail at the extra_fields
a simple example is here: http://wiki.dovecot.org/AuthDatabase/PasswdFile
do a search at the wiki
Maxime Brugidou wrote:
| current version : 1.0.rc15
|
| Hi,
|
| I would just like to know if it's possible to
Maxime Brugidou wrote:
Can you do this with /etc/passwd ?
I tried to put a line like this :
pseudo:x:1010:100:My
Name,,,:/home/pseudo:/bin/zsh:userdb_mail=mbox:~/mail
But it doesn't work : I cannot even login using that line (the shell is
considered to be /bin/zsh:userdb_mail=mbox:~/mail)
I
Le samedi 26 janvier 2008 à 03:00:21, Matt Ezell a écrit :
You cannot do that with the /etc/passwd, only with a passwd-file. Not very
useful if you are
using them as actual system users.
What you probably need to do is override the mail_executable setting to point
to a script.
See the
Before I spend some time experimenting with what might be impossible,
maybe someone can just tell me (either how or that it's
impossible).
I'd like to get perdition out of my environment (mainly to have one
less moving part in my architecture). I'm looking at dovecot's
built-in proxying. In my
* WJCarpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Before I spend some time experimenting with what might be impossible,
maybe someone can just tell me (either how or that it's
impossible).
I'd like to get perdition out of my environment (mainly to have one
less moving part in my architecture). I'm looking
16 matches
Mail list logo