[Dovecot] fourat wants to keep up with you on Twitter

2008-04-29 Thread fourat
To find out more about Twitter, visit the link below: http://twitter.com/i/8859b2431664c01a1adfe2051a644a79b4cc1689 Thanks, -The Twitter Team About Twitter Twitter is a unique approach to communication and networking based on the simple concept of status. What are you doing? What are your frie

[Dovecot] new auth connection (for ever)

2008-04-29 Thread Evaggelos Balaskas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi everybody, I have a little problem, when i am trying to read an email via imap my thunderbird is trying (for ever) to read it. My dovecot tells me : dovecot: Apr 29 22:47:23 Error: IMAP(ebalaskas): FETCH for mailbox oreilly UID 24 got too little

Re: [Dovecot] Quota not showing properly in webmail

2008-04-29 Thread Eden
Thanks a lot Timo, that was exactly what was causing the error. It works now with every dovecot version I try. 2008/4/29 Charles Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 4/29/2008 1:13 PM, Eden wrote: > > > Showing all My confg again this time including the sql config: > > > > Please don't do that, just

Re: [Dovecot] Connection problems using dovecot proxy

2008-04-29 Thread Adrian Wojcicki | Unternehmensberatung Wojcicki
Timo Sirainen wrote: On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 16:02 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 16:00 +0200, Adrian Wojcicki | Unternehmensberatung Wojcicki wrote: Now, while this setup works using Thunderbird, iPhone, etc. I have problems connecting using a Samsung Qbowl. It simply aborts w

Re: [Dovecot] Quota not showing properly in webmail

2008-04-29 Thread Charles Marcus
On 4/29/2008 1:13 PM, Eden wrote: Showing all My confg again this time including the sql config: Please don't do that, just provide the output of dovecot -n... Until Timo gets around to making this command output ALL config settings being used, you'll still have to provide those settings that

Re: [Dovecot] Quota not showing properly in webmail

2008-04-29 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Apr 29, 2008, at 8:13 PM, Eden wrote: user_query = SELECT '/vmail/[EMAIL PROTECTED]' AS home, 'maildir:/vmail/[EMAIL PROTECTED]' AS mail, 150 AS uid, 8 AS gid, CONCAT('dirsize:storage=', quota) AS quota Looks like you're not even using Maildir++ quota. Change the above to: CONCAT('maildir

Re: [Dovecot] Quota not showing properly in webmail

2008-04-29 Thread Eden
Showing all My confg again this time including the sql config: * dovecot.conf: ##* ## Dovecot configuration file # base_dir = /var/run/dovecot/ disable_plaintext_auth = no # # imap imaps pop3 pop3s (use imaps and pop3s if configured for SSL) protocols = imap imaps pop3

Re: [Dovecot] Broken Header uidvalidity problem after upgrade

2008-04-29 Thread Robert Henjes
Timo Sirainen schrieb: On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 17:10 +0200, Robert Henjes wrote: Is there a possibility to check the uidvalidity from administrators point of view on the server? Something like: find . -name dovecot-uidlist|xargs head -1|grep '^1 0 ' The point is just that UIDVALIDITY m

Re: [Dovecot] Replication protocol design

2008-04-29 Thread Tommi Virtanen
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 02:59:52AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: > > 1. A mail arrives in server1 > > 2. User reads it (therefore the mail has a UID assigned) > > 3. server2 gets isolated from server1 > > 4. A mail arrives at server2 > > 5. User logs in to server2 and reads it (therefore the mail has

Re: [Dovecot] Replication protocol design

2008-04-29 Thread Ed W
Timo Sirainen wrote: I'll probably be implementing multi-master replication this summer. My previous thoughts about it are here: http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2007-December/027284.html Below is a description of how the replication protocol will probably work. It should work just as well for ma

Re: [Dovecot] Broken Header uidvalidity problem after upgrade

2008-04-29 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 17:10 +0200, Robert Henjes wrote: > Is there a possibility to check the uidvalidity from administrators > point of view on the server? Something like: find . -name dovecot-uidlist|xargs head -1|grep '^1 0 ' The point is just that UIDVALIDITY must not be zero. Dovecot relie

Re: [Dovecot] Broken Header uidvalidity problem after upgrade

2008-04-29 Thread Robert Henjes
Timo Sirainen schrieb: On Apr 29, 2008, at 12:19 PM, Robert Henjes wrote: Excerpt from mail.err: Apr 21 12:04:38 servera deliver(usera): /var/mail/Maildir/usera/dovecot-uidlist: Broken header (uidvalidity = 0, next_uid=9) Apr 21 15:37:50 servera deliver(userb): /var/mail/Maildir/userb/dovecot

Re: [Dovecot] Broken Header uidvalidity problem after upgrade

2008-04-29 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Apr 29, 2008, at 12:19 PM, Robert Henjes wrote: Excerpt from mail.err: Apr 21 12:04:38 servera deliver(usera): /var/mail/Maildir/usera/ dovecot-uidlist: Broken header (uidvalidity = 0, next_uid=9) Apr 21 15:37:50 servera deliver(userb): /var/mail/Maildir/userb/ dovecot-uidlist: Broken header

Re: [Dovecot] reason to switch to 1.1

2008-04-29 Thread Geert Hendrickx
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:49:43AM +0200, Cor Bosman wrote: > > How large are the (individual) mailboxes you're hosting there? > > Most of them are max 500MB, but average use is much less. It's a little > difficult to calculate because almost all POP users empty their mailbox. > We did some report

Re: [Dovecot] reason to switch to 1.1

2008-04-29 Thread Cor Bosman
> How large are the (individual) mailboxes you're hosting there? Most of them are max 500MB, but average use is much less. It's a little difficult to calculate because almost all POP users empty their mailbox. We did some reports a few months ago where it showed that average mailbox size for POP u

[Dovecot] Broken Header uidvalidity problem after upgrade

2008-04-29 Thread Robert Henjes
Hi, we use a current Debian etch distribution as basis for our servers, which are running within a vmware server environment. Our current configuration consists of a dovecot server with imap enabled and a ldap based authentication. Mails are stored using the Maildir format on a central nfs stor

Re: [Dovecot] reason to switch to 1.1

2008-04-29 Thread Chris Laif
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Cor Bosman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just in case I understand you wrong: You're serving 20k concurrent > > users with 1 (one) server? > > Wait, I think I misunderstood you. We do not have just 1 imap server. > We have 30 imap servers (a little overdimensio

Re: [Dovecot] reason to switch to 1.1

2008-04-29 Thread Geert Hendrickx
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 09:42:10AM +0200, Cor Bosman wrote: > Actually..it's 2 NetApp 6070s. But those are not just simple servers. > They are very expensive, dedicated NFS boxes each taking up a full rack > doing multiple terrabytes each, connected with multiple gbit links. > > It's 99.99% maildi

Re: [Dovecot] reason to switch to 1.1

2008-04-29 Thread Cor Bosman
> Just in case I understand you wrong: You're serving 20k concurrent > users with 1 (one) server? Wait, I think I misunderstood you. We do not have just 1 imap server. We have 30 imap servers (a little overdimensioned at this time). I was just showing the graph of one of them. The others look sim

Re: [Dovecot] reason to switch to 1.1

2008-04-29 Thread Cor Bosman
> > This specific server is a dual core 2.8ghz xeon with hyperthreading > > running on FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE. We have over 1 million mailboxes, with about > > 75,000 daily active users. At peak maybe 20,000 concurrent, in a mix of > > webmail and direct imap. (no POP, thats handled by different s

Re: [Dovecot] reason to switch to 1.1

2008-04-29 Thread Chris Laif
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Cor Bosman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It may be good to list your hardware, user count, mailbox backend, and > > file system information, as I suppose that this kind of improvement is not > > universal. > > This specific server is a dual core 2.8ghz xeon wi