Congrats timo!
Cor
Congratulations on your new major release. We all appreciate the fine
work you are doing.
On Jun 21, 2008, at 6:00 AM, Barry R Cisna wrote:
It looks to me after setting the mail_debug=yes in the dovecot.conf
quota is looking for the maildir to be Maildir
(/home/superuser/Maildir, rwx).
my install has mailboxes listed as mail>> /home/superuser/mail ( not
Maildir)
How do i comment
It looks to me after setting the mail_debug=yes in the dovecot.conf
quota is looking for the maildir to be Maildir
>>(/home/superuser/Maildir, rwx).
my install has mailboxes listed as mail>> /home/superuser/mail ( not
Maildir)
How do i comment the quota to make a directive to correct this?
maild
On Jun 21, 2008, at 5:58 AM, Luca Corti wrote:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../src/lib -I../../src/lib-sql
-I../../src/lib-settings -I../../src/lib-ntlm -I../../src/lib-otp
-DAUTH_MODULE_DIR=\""/usr/local/lib/dovecot/auth"\" -DPKG_LIBEXECDIR=
\""/usr/local/libexec/dovecot"\"-std=gnu
On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 04:46 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.0.tar.gz
> http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.0.tar.gz.sig
>
> Two hours later than promised, I slept longer than intended. :)
First of all, great work...
> No changes since v1.1.rc13.
On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 00:45 +, TBlack wrote:
> Warning: fd limit 256 is lower than what Dovecot can use under full load
> (more than 640). Either grow the limit or change login_max_processes_count
> and max_mail_processes settings
> Warning: Last died with error (see error log for more inform
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.0.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.0.tar.gz.sig
Two hours later than promised, I slept longer than intended. :)
No changes since v1.1.rc13. Below are the largest changes since v1.0:
* After Dovecot v1.1 has modified index or d
On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 00:17 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 00:13 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > > > Back to the original question - discount SSH - how do we get
> > > > compression + SSL out of openssl..
> > >
> > > I don't think it's possible. OpenSSL says, in the NOTES sect
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 18:44 +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Hi all, is acl ( with acl plugin enabled )
> anounced in imap_capability list by dovecot
> i cant find it in telnet tests, so is it my fault or
> is it default beavior using 1.1.rc12
ACL capability announces support for IMAP ACL command
Hi all.
I'm trying to install Dovecot 1.1.rc13 on Cygwin.
I've read the related posts, and I realize that maybe there's no solution at
present; since I'm having a different error, though, I'm posting it here.
Compilation succeeds. Starting dovecot from command line results in:
Warning: fd limit
On Jun 21, 2008, at 1:26 AM, Barry R Cisna wrote:
Problem: I can not get my dovecot 1.1 rc10(rpm) to generate an
maildirsize file in each of the users homedir. I have re-edited the
dovecot.conf file many many times but still no joy.
Set mail_debug=yes and see what gets logged.
How would I go
On Jun 20, 2008, at 11:04 PM, Diego Liziero wrote:
Any chance to have this assert converted to error as last patch
before 1.1?
Or am I the only one that is still getting this in rc13?
Yes, you're the only one.. I should try looking into that bug again at
some point..
PGP.sig
Descripti
On Jun 20, 2008, at 7:45 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
A little more information. One ove my server side folders became
essentially inaccessable. The folder was empty. This folder is
actually emptied by another process that reads and deletes the
content of this folder. Using Thunderbird the messag
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 18:25 +0100, Ed W wrote:
> OK, my interested is piqued now - does anyone have a recipe for how to
> make openssl compress the traffic before encrypting it? (Or perhaps it
> does by default?)
Incidentally, and you may complain about it being off-topic again,
there's also an
Hello List,
Getting ready to setup a new dovecot sendmail squirrelmail server for
our school which is currently running on a 4 year old install of the
same, which has worked like a champ by the way.
-
EL5
dovecot-1.1 rc10 rpm
sendmail
squirrelmail
-
Problem
On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 00:13 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > > Back to the original question - discount SSH - how do we get
> > > compression + SSL out of openssl..
> >
> > I don't think it's possible. OpenSSL says, in the NOTES section of
> > SSL_COMP_add_compression_method(3):
> >
> > Th
> > Back to the original question - discount SSH - how do we get
> > compression + SSL out of openssl..
>
> I don't think it's possible. OpenSSL says, in the NOTES section of
> SSL_COMP_add_compression_method(3):
>
> The TLS standard (or SSLv3) allows the integration of
> compres
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 23:04 +0100, Ed W wrote:
> Johannes Berg wrote:
> > > I don't think it does be default. The only what I know is to establish a
> > > compressed SSH tunnel to your server and then access the server over the
> > > tunnel. It will compress and give you an extra layer of encryp
Johannes Berg wrote:
I don't think it does be default. The only what I know is to establish a
compressed SSH tunnel to your server and then access the server over the
tunnel. It will compress and give you an extra layer of encryption.
Umm, no. It will not compress. Think about it, encrypt
Bill Cole wrote:
> At 11:10 AM +0200 6/20/08, Anders wrote:
>>By that line, the entire "time moved backwards" thing does not belong
>>in Dovecot.
>
> I suspect that you don't understand why that is in Dovecot. Timo has
> explained it in detail a few times, but the bottom line is simple:
> running
> > IOW,
> > dovecot would see an SSL connection too.
>
> Hmm, yes. I took it to mean that the 'encrypt' of
>
> encrypt(compress(imap stream))
>
> was the "extra layer". But, I think your interpretation is more easily
> arrived at, and if it's what Mark meant, you're absolutely right that the
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, Johannes Berg wrote:
I don't think it does be default. The only what I know is to establish
a compressed SSH tunnel to your server and then access the server over
the tunnel. It will compress and give you an extra layer of encryption.
Umm, no. It will not compress. Think
> >> I don't think it does be default. The only what I know is to establish
> >> a compressed SSH tunnel to your server and then access the server over
> >> the tunnel. It will compress and give you an extra layer of encryption.
> >
> > Umm, no. It will not compress. Think about it, encrypted da
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, Johannes Berg wrote:
I don't think it does be default. The only what I know is to establish
a compressed SSH tunnel to your server and then access the server over
the tunnel. It will compress and give you an extra layer of encryption.
Umm, no. It will not compress. Thin
Any chance to have this assert converted to error as last patch before 1.1?
Or am I the only one that is still getting this in rc13?
Regards,
Diego
--- ./src/lib-storage/index/index-sync.c-orig 2008-03-13
16:46:36.0 +0100
+++ ./src/lib-storage/index/index-sync.c2008-03-13
16:51
> I don't think it does be default. The only what I know is to establish a
> compressed SSH tunnel to your server and then access the server over the
> tunnel. It will compress and give you an extra layer of encryption.
Umm, no. It will not compress. Think about it, encrypted data is
fundamenta
Ed W wrote:
OK, my interested is piqued now - does anyone have a recipe for how to
make openssl compress the traffic before encrypting it? (Or perhaps it
does by default?)
Ed W
I don't think it does be default. The only what I know is to establish a
compressed SSH tunnel to your server an
OK, my interested is piqued now - does anyone have a recipe for how to
make openssl compress the traffic before encrypting it? (Or perhaps it
does by default?)
Ed W
A little more information. One ove my server side folders became
essentially inaccessable. The folder was empty. This folder is actually
emptied by another process that reads and deletes the content of this
folder. Using Thunderbird the message count showed as having 1 message
but no messages s
Hi all, is acl ( with acl plugin enabled )
anounced in imap_capability list by dovecot
i cant find it in telnet tests, so is it my fault or
is it default beavior using 1.1.rc12
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
At 11:10 AM +0200 6/20/08, Anders wrote:
Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 10:53 +0200, Anders wrote:
I was puzzled that it was always 4398 seconds, in particular because
this server runs an NTP daemon. A little searching for this problem
shows that it is an
Hi.
Read the example conf and doku about the quota warning stuff, but how might
such a "sh" file may look?
If i want to sent a mail to the user, how to get the mail address?
Wheres the glue between the "sh" file and the percentage given and the user?
thx for hints
Torsten
--
Bitte senden Sie m
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 13:39 +0100, Ed W wrote:
> >> Can I make a very weak suggestion to look at that ZLIB compression
> >> extension I think you mentioned in the past?
> >
> > It would have to be done by proxying in imap-login similar to how SSL
> > connections are handled. But aren't you using
Can I make a very weak suggestion to look at that ZLIB compression
extension I think you mentioned in the past?
It would have to be done by proxying in imap-login similar to how SSL
connections are handled. But aren't you using SSL already, and why
not? Using that would give compression for
On Jun 20, 2008, at 3:02 PM, Ed W wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
This one is the last major unimplemented v1.2 feature.
Can I make a very weak suggestion to look at that ZLIB compression
extension I think you mentioned in the past?
It would have to be done by proxying in imap-login similar
Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc13.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc13.tar.gz.sig
There's always time for one more release candidate. :) I was planning on
releasing v1.1.0 a couple of minutes before summer solstice (23:59 UTC
according
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 11:55:02AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 17:14 -0400, Adam McDougall wrote:
> This happened from one user near noon on the 17th and 19th (today) of
> this month. From the backtrace it looks like they were searching, but I
> won't know for sure
Timo Sirainen wrote:
This one is the last major unimplemented v1.2 feature.
Can I make a very weak suggestion to look at that ZLIB compression
extension I think you mentioned in the past?
The motivation is that I find my "8 mbit broadband" link seems to
saturate at quite low numbers of he
> This bug causes Dovecot to run the IO loop in the future for one
> iteration, and then die when we get back to present time.
>
> By the time Dovecot dies, some damage could already have happend, for
> example if ioloop_time is stored to permanent storage.
Hmm, ok, I was under the impression
Johannes Berg wrote:
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 11:10 +0200, Anders wrote:
Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 10:53 +0200, Anders wrote:
I was puzzled that it was always 4398 seconds, in particular because
this server runs an NTP daemon. A little searching for this pro
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 11:10 +0200, Anders wrote:
> Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 10:53 +0200, Anders wrote:
> >>
> >> I was puzzled that it was always 4398 seconds, in particular because
> >> this server runs an NTP daemon. A little searching for this proble
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc13.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc13.tar.gz.sig
There's always time for one more release candidate. :) I was planning on
releasing v1.1.0 a couple of minutes before summer solstice (23:59 UTC
according to Wikipedia). Maybe i
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 10:53 +0200, Anders wrote:
> Dovecot (v1.1.rc8) died tonight, with an error about time moving
> backwards by 4398 seconds. I can see from logs that this has happend a
> few times before with the imap processes, without me noticing. I sure
> noticed the master process missing,
Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 10:53 +0200, Anders wrote:
>>
>> I was puzzled that it was always 4398 seconds, in particular because
>> this server runs an NTP daemon. A little searching for this problem
>> shows that it is an issue with the Linux kernel gettimeo
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 10:53 +0200, Anders wrote:
> Dovecot (v1.1.rc8) died tonight, with an error about time moving
> backwards by 4398 seconds. I can see from logs that this has happend a
> few times before with the imap processes, without me noticing. I sure
> noticed the master process missing,
On Friday 20 June 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 09:42 +0200, Diego Liziero wrote:
> >
> > Timo,
> > here is an anonymized mbox file that causes it at every body search
> > (tested with rc12).
>
> Did you test it without index files? I couldn't reproduce the crash.
Deleting ind
On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 17:14 -0400, Adam McDougall wrote:
> This happened from one user near noon on the 17th and 19th (today) of
> this month. From the backtrace it looks like they were searching, but I
> won't know for sure unless I need to ask them. Is this possibly fixed
> already? I just
Dovecot (v1.1.rc8) died tonight, with an error about time moving
backwards by 4398 seconds. I can see from logs that this has happend a
few times before with the imap processes, without me noticing. I sure
noticed the master process missing, though :-).
I was puzzled that it was always 4398 second
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 11:23 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 16:21 +0800, Patrick Nagel wrote:
> > On Friday 20 June 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > > > > Now I get this with 1.1.rc10:
> > > > >
> > > > > Jun 20 11:53:53 stshamail1 dovecot: Panic: IMAP(username): file
> > > > >
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 16:21 +0800, Patrick Nagel wrote:
> On Friday 20 June 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > > > Now I get this with 1.1.rc10:
> > > >
> > > > Jun 20 11:53:53 stshamail1 dovecot: Panic: IMAP(username): file
> > > > message-parser.c: line 770 (message_parser_parse_next_block):
> > >
On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 22:01 -0700, Woonsan Ko wrote:
> Hi Timo,
>
> I finally succeeded in compiling dovecot-1.1.rc12 on AIX with the following
> patch:
>
> http://users.handysoft.co.kr/~wsko/resource/aix.diff
> + -e 's/\"\/usr\/include\/rpcsvc\/rquota\.h\"/\"rquota.h\"/' \
I don't t
On Friday 20 June 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > > Now I get this with 1.1.rc10:
> > >
> > > Jun 20 11:53:53 stshamail1 dovecot: Panic: IMAP(username): file
> > > message-parser.c: line 770 (message_parser_parse_next_block):
> > > assertion failed: (ctx->input->eof || ctx->input->closed ||
> > >
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 09:42 +0200, Diego Liziero wrote:
> On 6/20/08, Patrick Nagel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > [..]
> >
> > Now I get this with 1.1.rc10:
> >
> > Jun 20 11:53:53 stshamail1 dovecot: Panic: IMAP(username): file
> > message-parser.c: line 770 (message_parser_parse_next_b
54 matches
Mail list logo
