On Jul 26, 2008, at 9:45 AM, Patrick Nagel wrote:
I should
think it's a one line to type in the IMAP search command and have it
execute?
But I don't know how to wait for / react to answers from the IMAP
server
(after listing mailboxes, selecting the mailbox, etc.) in shell (bash)
script,
On Jul 24, 2008, at 8:58 PM, John Baker wrote:
Hi there
We had been using the stock Ubuntu Dapper Dovecot which is an early
1.0 beta but just upgraded to 1.1.1 to fix some read flag issues
with Horde.
Previously dovecot seemed to ignore files beginning with . in the
~/mail (mbox
On Jul 24, 2008, at 8:40 AM, Cor Bosman wrote:
Here's another example:
u/un/unaxxxno/INBOX/.Sent Items:
total 8
drw--- 2 unxxxano user 4096 Jul 1 19:51 .
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 424263 Jun 25 13:51 /usr/local/sbin/dovecot
So this was created after we started using 1.1.1.
So this was created after we started using 1.1.1. Yesterday I only
found
5 after a week of operation. So I realize this can be very hard to
find
as we have millions and millions of folders. In theory it could even
be an NFS server bug, although we havent seen this in the mailspool
Hi
I hope you're not offended by posting a quote to the list...
you sent the mail just to me.
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here here is an excerpt:
ls -l home/matthew/Maildir/cur
...
drwx-- 2 matthew matthew 512 Jul 30 17:48 cur:2,ST
drwx-- 2 matthew
On Jul 31, 2008, at 1:50 PM, Cor Bosman wrote:
So this was created after we started using 1.1.1. Yesterday I only
found
5 after a week of operation. So I realize this can be very hard to
find
as we have millions and millions of folders. In theory it could even
be an NFS server bug, although we
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Do you have dovecot-shared file in the maildir? If it exists, Dovecot
uses only its index file for storing \Seen flags (to get per-user
\Seen flags with shared mailboxes).
I do, to set the owner/group and mode of files. (The mailboxes aren't
really shared, actually.) Any
find
as we have millions and millions of folders. In theory it could even
be an NFS server bug, although we havent seen this in the mailspool
directories.
Do you see any errors related to this in log files? Do you see
maildirfolder file inside that directory? If it really is created
That's done it, all OK now. Thank you so much, you have made me very happy!!
There was a problem in the .procmailrc file.
Thanks again
matthew
2008/7/31 Matthias Andree [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
I hope you're not offended by posting a quote to the list...
you sent the mail just to me.
On
Hello,
I'd like to figure out how to set up a site running dovecot on multiple
computers for load balancing reasons.
I'm currently running dovecot-1.0.14 on a 8GB RAM, 2 quad-core 2.66Ghz Xeon
single server which runs FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE SMP.
. the mailbox format was mbox and I successfully
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Thomas Hummel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Every friday a message (no attachement, decent size) is sent to all users : in
such circumstances (but only sometimes, not every time : let's say half the
time such a message is sent), the load goes so high that I have to
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 03:07:28PM +0200, Chris Laif wrote:
Do you use dovecot's delivery agent (LDA)?
As I stated, no. I need the procmail filtering features.
If you use multiple servers you can use dovecot's proxy-feature to
redirect the user to the correct server. You just need a
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 03:26:06PM +0200, Thomas Hummel wrote:
I don't quite understand the proxy_maybe option :
Also, 2 things which aren't quite clear to me in the Wiki :
a) Password forwarding
Make sure that the authentication succeeds with any given password. You can do
this by using
On Jul 31, 2008, at 8:44 AM, Thomas Hummel wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 03:26:06PM +0200, Thomas Hummel wrote:
I don't quite understand the proxy_maybe option :
Also, 2 things which aren't quite clear to me in the Wiki :
a) Password forwarding
Make sure that the authentication succeeds
Do you use dovecot's delivery agent (LDA)?
As I stated, no. I need the procmail filtering features.
Call dovecot LDA inside of procmail!
It will speed up your configuration certainly.
procmailrc should contain something like:
DELIVER=/path/to/dovecot/deliver
:0 w
| $DELIVER
Works like
Thomas Hummel wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 03:26:06PM +0200, Thomas Hummel wrote:
I don't quite understand the proxy_maybe option :
The proxy_maybe allows you to have a user log into a server that is both
doing proxy logins for another host as well as local logins. So User A
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 7:15 AM, Thomas Hummel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think that DNS round robin would do the trick because some UA (for
instance Thunderbird) often open up to 5 connexions for the same user, unless
maybe such UA makes a single 'gethostbyname()', thus connecting 5
Thomas Hummel wrote:
The same machine is running postfix-2.4.6 with amavisd-new-2.5.4 (no
spamassassin) and clamav-0.93.1. I'm using procmail-3.22 as the LDA.
I installed dovecot-1.1.2 on non-standard ports for test and plan to
switch to
it as I read on this list it performs better, load
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 10:18:22AM -0400, Eric Toczek wrote:
connection onto server 2. User B connects into server 1 and they live on
server 1, so proxy_maybe allows the connect to be made direct even
though their proxy setting says they go to a specific host (which
happens to be server 1)
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 04:13:51PM +0200, Sven Eulberg wrote:
Call dovecot LDA inside of procmail!
[...]
Works like a charm.
Thanks, I was thinking about something like that.
--
Thomas Hummel | Institut Pasteur
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Pôle informatique - systèmes et réseau
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 09:21:16AM -0500, Gabriel Millerd wrote:
I am not seeing the issue, your seeing issues with the UA spreading
the connects across multiple servers?
I was thinking of what is described here in the Wiki :
http://wiki.dovecot.org/NFS
NFS caching is a big problem when
Hi folks,
I'm using dovecot 1.0.13 as the IMAPS frontend for a vpopmail/qmail
virtual domain setup. Dovecot is set up as follows:
passdb vpopmail{
}
userdb vpopmail{
}
I've added a domain alias for the main domain with vaddaliasdomain and
email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is delivered to [EMAIL
On Jul 31, 2008, at 2:38 PM, Cor Bosman wrote:
But what about the maildirfolder file? Does it exist? If not, do you
see an error in logs:
open(.../maildirfolder, O_CREAT) failed: Permission denied
I dont see any logged errors with O_CREAT. Only these:
dovecot-uidlist) failed: Permission
userimap1# cd /var/spool/mail/dovecot-control/r/ro/rossXXX/
INBOX/.Sport.NKR
userimap1# ls -al
total 8
drw--- 2 rossXXX user 4096 Jul 2 18:35 .
drwx-- 33 rossXXX user 4096 Jul 31 07:39 ..
That's beginning to sound like Dovecot isn't even creating these
directories. But
I don't quite understand the proxy_maybe option :
proxy_maybe can be used to implement automatic proxying. If the proxy
destination matches the current connection, the user gets logged in normally
instead of being proxied. If the same happens with proxy, the login fails with
Proxying loops
On Jul 31, 2008, at 7:31 PM, Cor Bosman wrote:
userimap1# cd /var/spool/mail/dovecot-control/r/ro/rossXXX/
INBOX/.Sport.NKR
userimap1# ls -al
total 8
drw--- 2 rossXXX user 4096 Jul 2 18:35 .
drwx-- 33 rossXXX user 4096 Jul 31 07:39 ..
That's beginning to sound like Dovecot
On Jul 31, 2008, at 2:03 PM, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Do you have dovecot-shared file in the maildir? If it exists, Dovecot
uses only its index file for storing \Seen flags (to get per-user
\Seen flags with shared mailboxes).
I do, to set the owner/group and mode of
On Jul 25, 2008, at 2:04 PM, Juan Asensio Sánchez wrote:
Hi
Using Dovecot 1.1.2 with LDAP. If i have this:
user_attrs = uid=home=/var/vmail/%
$,mailuserquota=quota_rule=*:storage=%$,=mail=maildir:/var/vmail/%n/
Maildir
OK. But if i have this:
user_attrs = uid=home=/var/vmail/%
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 06:05:27PM +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
but it seems to be off by default. From my dovecot.conf (1.07):
#pop3_lock_session = no
I think it should be on by default.
The problem is if you have an MUA/MDA retrieving lots of messages
over a potentially slow connection,
On Jul 31, 2008, at 8:10 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 06:05:27PM +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
but it seems to be off by default. From my dovecot.conf (1.07):
#pop3_lock_session = no
I think it should be on by default.
The problem is if you have an MUA/MDA retrieving lots
Hello all,
I'm using dovecot version 1.07 on CentoOS 5 (clone of RHEL 5).
When there is no existing mbox file for a user in /var/mail I get the following
error:
---
Jul 31 16:32:32 newnewton dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=testm2,
method=PLAIN,
rip=:::127.0.0.1,
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Steve Ochani wrote:
Hello all,
I'm using dovecot version 1.07 on CentoOS 5 (clone of RHEL 5).
When there is no existing mbox file for a user in /var/mail I get the following
error:
---
Jul 31 16:32:32 newnewton dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=testm2,
Hi,
On 31 Jul 2008 at 17:16, Tom Diehl wrote:
Date sent: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:16:24 -0400 (EDT)
From: Tom Diehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: [Dovecot] Permission denied creating inbox file in
/var/mail
To: Steve Ochani [EMAIL
I was wondering if it could be useful to use such tools to keep track
of users bugs.
I find somehow harder to search the mailing list if a bug is known, if
it's being worked on, if it needs more feedback, in witch release it
has been eventually solved, and so on.
Any thoughts?
Regards,
Diego.
On Aug 1, 2008, at 12:42 AM, Steve Ochani wrote:
I think dovecot should use the mail_privileged_group group to also
be able to create files, this
was mentioned a couple of times before in other posts.
v1.1 does this.
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Diego Liziero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Diego Liziero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 11:17 PM, Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe this helps? http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/dd9d344ba140
On Aug 1, 2008, at 1:49 AM, Diego Liziero wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Diego Liziero [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Diego Liziero [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 11:17 PM, Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe this helps?
On Aug 1, 2008, at 12:51 AM, Diego Liziero wrote:
I was wondering if it could be useful to use such tools to keep track
of users bugs.
I find somehow harder to search the mailing list if a bug is known, if
it's being worked on, if it needs more feedback, in witch release it
has been eventually
So, the final determination here is that newer versions of Dovecot than
the one I'm currently running will successfully lock up a mailbox and
limit access to it to a single session while that session exists (up to
a finite timeout, which I think is two minutes), right? Okay, then.
Has anyone
Adrian Overbury wrote:
So, the final determination here is that newer versions of Dovecot than
the one I'm currently running will successfully lock up a mailbox and
limit access to it to a single session while that session exists (up to
a finite timeout, which I think is two minutes), right?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Timo Sirainen wrote:
| printf 1 select $mailbox\n2 search text x93hgdgd\n3 logout\n |
| dovecot --exec-mail imap
|
| For getting the list of mailboxes:
|
| mailboxes=`printf 1 list *\n | dovecot --exec-mail imap | perl magic`
Ok, looks easy.
41 matches
Mail list logo
