-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
this may be an obvious logical problem I'm not aware of, which cannot be solved
any more efficiently... but maybe it's just a bug or there is potential for
optimisation in Dovecot (or Thunderbird?).
When searching for multiple terms at once ("an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Thomas Harold wrote:
Check out /usr/include/sysexits.h what exit code 70 means on your system -
70 is internal software error in Linux. Then check when /usr/lib/sendmail
will exit with this code.
Deliver will run /usr/lib/sen
Hi,
All parts of dovecot except deliver uses the result of hostpid_init() in
src/lib/hostpid.c as a hostname which only asks gethostname().
deliver honours environment variable HOSTNAME in src/deliver/deliver.c:
getenv("HOSTNAME");
and uses the hostname of hostpid_init() as a fallback.
Wou
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Jul 31, 2008, at 12:20 PM, Heiko Schlichting wrote:
>> Without logging the pid, it is impossible to match 'Disconnected' log
>> entries and the corresponding session start/login.
>
> You can use %p in mail_log_prefix to log imap/pop3 process PID. It can't be
> done with l
Using 1.1.2
We have:
# default namespace
namespace private {
separator = /
prefix =
inbox = yes
#location = maildir:/home/virtual/%h
#Maildir
}
# for backwards compatibility:
namespace private {
separator = /
prefix = mail/
CJ, Sephan,
On Friday 08 August 2008 16:37:11 CJ Keist wrote:
>Thank you, didn't realize how buggy the libphp-sieve was. It does
> compile fine with sievec.
Fixed the issue last night. If you find other bugs, please let me know through
the bug-tracker in the future. I rely on feedback to ge
On 8/13/2008, Daniel Watts ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
If i set the prefix to blank I only see my Inbox and Deleted folders.
Interestingly it shows 'Deleted' not 'Trash'. I guess Thunderbird
renames 'Trash'.
Maybe this is a TBird issue rather than dovecot? The Trash is a 'special
folder' to mos
Hello:
I think you are missing a point which is most important, i.e., what type of
support Cyrus vs Dovecot offers. In my experience:
Cyrus = 0
Dovecot= 100
My personal experience.
Kirt
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 8/13/2008, Daniel Watts ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
If i set the prefix to blank I only see my Inbox and Deleted folders.
Interestingly it shows 'Deleted' not 'Trash'. I guess Thunderbird
renames 'Trash'.
Maybe this is a TBird issue rather than dovecot? The Trash is a '
kbajwa wrote:
Hello:
I think you are missing a point which is most important, i.e., what type of
support Cyrus vs Dovecot offers. In my experience:
Cyrus = 0
Dovecot= 100
My personal experience.
Don't forget that although for some reason he doesn't widely advertise
it - Timo
kbajwa a écrit :
Hello:
I think you are missing a point which is most important, i.e., what type of
support Cyrus vs Dovecot offers. In my experience:
Cyrus = 0
Dovecot= 100
My personal experience.
Kirt
I guess you've right but I can't post this answer at Cyrus mailing list.
I'
Steffen Kaiser, 13.08.2008 (d.m.y):
> On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Thomas Harold wrote:
>
> Check out /usr/include/sysexits.h what exit code 70 means on your system
> - 70 is internal software error in Linux. Then check when
> /usr/lib/sendmail will exit with this code.
>
> Deliver will run /usr/lib/sen
I've noticed when I select a folder of messages (Thunderbird) and mark
them all as read (or unread) it produces the following IMAP transcript:
Source Destination Info
c.c.c.c s.s.s.s Request: DONE
s.s.s.s c.c.c.c Response: 20 OK Idle completed.
c.c.c.c s.s.s.s Request: 21 uid store 1:20 -Fl
Mathieu Kretchner wrote:
kbajwa a écrit :
Hello:
I think you are missing a point which is most important, i.e., what
type of
support Cyrus vs Dovecot offers. In my experience:
Cyrus = 0
Dovecot= 100
My personal experience.
Kirt
I guess you've right but I can't post this answer
On Aug 13, 2008, at 12:44 PM, Ed W wrote:
On the cyrus list they mentioned email retention policies. Now some
people are going to say that this is really a job for the MTA
(postfix/sendmail/etc). However, you have some plugins which might
get you partly towards solving that need, but noth
On Aug 12, 2008, at 7:17 PM, Epimedia wrote:
Hello, a bit of a problem with Dovecot. Version is 1.0.15 and is a
default install (no changes to config) from FC8 repository... except
that Dovecot is configured to use Maildir
I have a user on the system who uses the tags in Thunderbird
(Impo
On Aug 13, 2008, at 12:12 PM, Daniel Watts wrote:
I've noticed when I select a folder of messages (Thunderbird) and
mark them all as read (or unread) it produces the following IMAP
transcript:
Source Destination Info
c.c.c.c s.s.s.s Request: DONE
s.s.s.s c.c.c.c Response: 20 OK Idle co
Christian Schmidt wrote:
Steffen Kaiser, 13.08.2008 (d.m.y):
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Thomas Harold wrote:
Check out /usr/include/sysexits.h what exit code 70 means on your system
- 70 is internal software error in Linux. Then check when
/usr/lib/sendmail will exit with this code.
Deliver will
On Aug 13, 2008, at 4:59 AM, Heiko Schlichting wrote:
I've thought about this before too though. Maybe some kind of a
unique
cookie could be useful.
Sounds good but complicated. The only reason why I try to match
login and
disconnect is that "imap" and "pop3" does not log a starting messa
On Aug 13, 2008, at 4:42 AM, Heiko Schlichting wrote:
All parts of dovecot except deliver uses the result of
hostpid_init() in
src/lib/hostpid.c as a hostname which only asks gethostname().
deliver honours environment variable HOSTNAME in src/deliver/
deliver.c:
getenv("HOSTNAME");
and
I've noticed when I select a folder of messages (Thunderbird) and
mark them all as read (or unread) it produces the following IMAP
transcript:
SourceDestinationInfo
c.c.c.cs.s.s.sRequest: DONE
s.s.s.sc.c.c.cResponse: 20 OK Idle completed.
c.c.c.cs.s.s.sRequest:
On 8/13/2008, Daniel Watts ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> The more I use Thunderbird the more I find it totally insane.
Did you file a bug report? I imagine this is something that could use
some fixing, and there is a much higher chance that the TBird devs will
listen than most other clients...
I a
On Aug 12, 2008, at 2:28 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
I choose to just use the magic configurable:
auth_gssapi_hostname = $ALL
rather than introduce more configurables
Yes, the less different settings there are the better. :) Committed to
v1.2 tree:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/9ca5e
Hi,
since upgrading to 1.1.x i still have this bugs "Next message unexpectedly
lost "
I read this Maillist some months ago and i believe that im not the only
one...
The Panics and crashes in 1.1.1 are gone by upgrading to 1.1.2 but these
"Next message unexpectedly lost " bugs are really annoy
On 8/13/2008 3:22 PM, Andre Hübner wrote:
> since upgrading to 1.1.x i still have this bugs "Next message
> unexpectedly lost "
> I read this Maillist some months ago and i believe that im not the only
> one...
> The Panics and crashes in 1.1.1 are gone by upgrading to 1.1.2 but these
> "Next messa
on 8-12-2008 7:26 AM CJ Keist spake the following:
Josef,
This is exactly same situation in our environment as well. I had to
make the same change as you stated. Our central virus/spam email
gateway also cans any message with out a valid from address in the mail
headers. I would think most v
Hi,
On 8/13/2008 3:22 PM, Andre Hübner wrote:
since upgrading to 1.1.x i still have this bugs "Next message
unexpectedly lost "
I read this Maillist some months ago and i believe that im not the only
one...
The Panics and crashes in 1.1.1 are gone by upgrading to 1.1.2 but these
"Next message
There was a thread several weeks (or months) ago on webmail applications.
I didn't like any of the options and only found few that I did but they
were either expensive or not maintained.
So ... I raised the question on the Catalyst Framework list about Perl
based webmail apps and got nothing
On 8/13/2008 3:59 PM, Andre Hübner wrote:
> ok, i did this some times already and was in contact with timo. may be
> there are some news in this case.
> i looked in the archives for similiar problems and saw that some users
> have this problem with 1.1.x and did not get answers
> f.i. http://dovec
Committed the patch to v1.2 tree with some changes:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/641d761219a6
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 04:23:46PM -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Committed the patch to v1.2 tree with some changes:
> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/641d761219a6
What happens when the winbind_spnego and the gssapi_spnego are
registered at once? I did not address this because I did not hav
On Aug 13, 2008, at 4:05 PM, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
What I'm looking for is a good reference, besides the RFC, on IMAP.
Anything out there? Electronic or dead-tree is fine. (A book of
Dovecot would be neat too.)
I wrote this a while ago: http://imapwiki.org/ClientImplementation
One t
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 03:07:55PM -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> + auth_request_log_info(request, "gssapi",
>> +"Using all keytab entires");
>
> I'm beginning to wonder about the logging in the code though. To me it
> looks like all of these should rather be log
On Aug 13, 2008, at 4:35 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
Ideally though it would be nice if the config file could specify a
mapping from SASL name to internal module and NTLM_USE_WINBIND could
go away.
Well, I renamed auth_ntlm_use_winbind to just auth_use_winbind:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Aug 13, 2008, at 4:05 PM, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
What I'm looking for is a good reference, besides the RFC, on IMAP.
Anything out there? Electronic or dead-tree is fine. (A book of
Dovecot would be neat too.)
I wrote this a while ago: http://imapwiki.org/ClientI
On Aug 13, 2008, at 3:22 PM, Andre Hübner wrote:
since upgrading to 1.1.x i still have this bugs "Next message
unexpectedly lost "
I read this Maillist some months ago and i believe that im not the
only one...
The Panics and crashes in 1.1.1 are gone by upgrading to 1.1.2 but
these
"Next me
On Aug 13 2008, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
I've seen several messages on the list that seem to indicate some
clients don't maintain the connection. It will be interesting to see
what the implications of this. Not sure if it can be done from a HTTP
connection as it is suppose to be stateless
On Aug 13, 2008, at 4:59 PM, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
One thing that would be nice, that pretty much no webmail does, is
to keep a stateful connection open all the time (or at least some
of the time) instead of creating tons of short-lived connections
that ask the same stuff over and ove
Brian Hayden wrote:
Have you investigated Prayer? That's what we use, in a modded version,
because it maintains persistent IMAP connections (among other reasons).
You could think of it as an IMAP client that happens to be using a web
browser to draw back to your screen, as if it were X Windows.
On Aug 13, 2008, at 3:25 AM, Patrick Nagel wrote:
this may be an obvious logical problem I'm not aware of, which
cannot be solved
any more efficiently... but maybe it's just a bug or there is
potential for
optimisation in Dovecot (or Thunderbird?).
When searching for multiple terms at once
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 04:37:11PM -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> One thing that would be nice, that pretty much no webmail does, is to
> keep a stateful connection open all the time (or at least some of the
> time) instead of creating tons of short-lived connections that ask the
> same stuff over a
On Wednesday, August 06, 2008 10:18 PM -0400 Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
So I guess you're using mbox? There it's safe to delete everything. If
you're using maildir you should keep dovecot-uidlist and dovecot-keywords.
I'm in the process of getting my head around the least painfu
On Aug 13, 2008, at 12:02 AM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
BTW: Timo please fix the bugs regarding deliver and dovecot index
bugs as already discussed. >Scanning large mailbox folders takes a
lot of time. If you need any help just let me know it.
I was never able to reproduce the problem myself
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Yea, ...
I've been meaning to tell you that should be "Yeah" for an informal
version of "Yes", otherwise it's a very archaic form of "Yes" or
"Indeed" as in "Yea, though I walk in the valley of the shadow of death"!
I think that's also true of American/Aussie etc. as
Mathieu Kretchner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
kbajwa a écrit :
Cyrus = 0
Dovecot= 100
I guess you've right but I can't post this answer at Cyrus mailing list.
I'm just trying to have my own opinion of imap server and I already have
sarcastic answer on the cyrus mailing list !
S
On 13 Aug 2008, at 10:31, kbajwa wrote:
I think you are missing a point which is most important, i.e., what
type of
support Cyrus vs Dovecot offers. In my experience:
Cyrus = 0
Dovecot= 100
As someone who answers many help requests for cyrus (and I'm very far
from the only one),
On Aug 13, 2008, at 5:24 PM, Chris Wakelin wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Yea, ...
I've been meaning to tell you that should be "Yeah" for an informal
version of "Yes", otherwise it's a very archaic form of "Yes" or
"Indeed" as in "Yea, though I walk in the valley of the shadow of
death"!
One or more users?
Many different users.
Post your dovecot -n output?
Here's some of it. Not very enlightening.
# 1.1.2: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
base_dir: /var/run/dovecot/
verbose_proctitle: yes
first_valid_uid: 6
last_valid_uid: 5
first_valid_gid: 6
last_valid_gid: 5
mail_access
On Aug 13, 2008, at 6:09 PM, Mike Abbott wrote:
mail_access_groups: mail
mail_privileged_group: mail
You probably won't need either of these. And there's no point in
setting them to the same value.
Can you reproduce these easily with my imaptest tool?
http://imapwiki.org/ImapTest
Some
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 6, 2008, at 6:11 AM, Diego Liziero wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Maybe this helps? http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/8ab845d3c96d
>>>
>>
>> It seems so,
On Aug 13, 2008, at 6:19 PM, Diego Liziero wrote:
Mmm.. I tried to comment out the "cork" part and added a 10% random
sleep after sending the command
if (!(rand()%9)) usleep(rand()%500);
and I started getting the famous "Error: IMAP(testdove): FETCH for
mailbox INBOX UID xxx got too little
On Aug 13, 2008, at 6:09 PM, Mike Abbott wrote:
Can you reproduce these easily with my imaptest tool?
http://imapwiki.org/ImapTest
Some of them. When running imaptest I see these dovecot errors:
Corrupted index cache file %s: record continues outside its
allocated size
Corrupted index cac
Geert Hendrickx wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 04:37:11PM -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
One thing that would be nice, that pretty much no webmail does, is to
keep a stateful connection open all the time (or at least some of the
time) instead of creating tons of short-lived connections that ask
On Aug 13, 2008, at 6:53 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Geert Hendrickx wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 04:37:11PM -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
One thing that would be nice, that pretty much no webmail does, is
to
keep a stateful connection open all the time (or at least some of
the
time) inste
Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Geert Hendrickx wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 04:37:11PM -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
One thing that would be nice, that pretty much no webmail does, is to
keep a stateful connection open all the time (or at least some of the
time) instead of creating tons of short-liv
How soon? With what kind of imaptest parameters? I can't reproduce
this on my Macbook (OS X 10.5.4, HFS+).
I ran imaptest for just a few minutes and saw all these errors in that
time. Default imaptest parameters except for user/host names etc.
Error: UIVALIDITY changed: %d -> %d
Did you
I'm hoping to migrate to dovecot from qpopper, with the eventual goal of
enabling IMAP. However, my qpopper installation is fairly specialized,
so I thought I'd ask here to see if anyone could get me headed down the
best path.
Here's the situation.
I'm running FreeBSD and have a virtual dom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:18:37 -0400, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 13, 2008, at 3:25 AM, Patrick Nagel wrote:
>
>> When searching for multiple terms at once ("any of") with
>> Thunderbird/Dovecot
>> (using FTS Squat indexes), it t
On Aug 13, 2008, at 7:12 PM, Mike Abbott wrote:
Error: UIVALIDITY changed: %d -> %d
Did you test with a single user or multiple users? imaptest's
support for testing multiple users is currently a bit broken, but
this shouldn't happen with a single user..
This error happens with clients=1
Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/patches/1.1/listescape-plugin.c should help. I also
committed a couple of fixes to hg to fix the error message.
Thanks, the new listescape seems to work.
On Aug 13, 2008, at 8:52 PM, Patrick Nagel wrote:
Requires a lot
more complexity to the code though..
Couldn't Dovecot just search the index with each single word (as it
does
now without OR), and then merge the results, filtering out double
UIDs?
This is probably not the most efficient way
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 01:07:34PM -0400, Wesley Craig wrote:
> On 13 Aug 2008, at 10:31, kbajwa wrote:
> > I think you are missing a point which is most important, i.e., what
> > type of
> > support Cyrus vs Dovecot offers. In my experience:
> >
> > Cyrus = 0
> > Dovecot= 100
>
> As
Hello Timo!
A configuration issue as we had with the config discussed below can be
definitly barred.
locate only finds somehting in /home/gerhard/Mail/.imap/ which is correct.
Config:
~/.imap 3 > ls -l
total 0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 gerhard users 30 Jun 13 22:30 INBOX ->
/home/gerhard/Mail/.imap/INBO
On Aug 13, 2008, at 4:03 PM, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Geert Hendrickx wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 04:37:11PM -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
One thing that would be nice, that pretty much no webmail does,
is to
keep a stateful connection open all the time (or at l
On Aug 14, 2008, at 1:26 AM, Sean Kamath wrote:
But the big killer is scaleability and handling multiple servers,
which is why some sort of front end like IMAPProxy are attractive.
I've heard that imapproxy isn't all that useful with Dovecot once auth
cache is enabled and set large enough.
Hey all,
I'm curious, has anyone been able to get outlook to do single sign on
with a linux IMAP/SMTP back end? I have it doing NTLM authentication
via the dovecot winbind module with Samba 3.2 just fine, but I have
yet to see it try to use the cached windows logon credentials.. It
appears to do a
On Aug 13, 2008, at 10:32 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Aug 14, 2008, at 1:26 AM, Sean Kamath wrote:
But the big killer is scaleability and handling multiple servers,
which is why some sort of front end like IMAPProxy are attractive.
I've heard that imapproxy isn't all that useful with Dovec
Hi All
My first post to the list, so "hello world"!
Having searched the list archives and the wiki for an answer to this, I
don't think it is possible. However, let me ask nonetheless...
Is it possible for a Dovecot proxy's login process (IMAP and POP3) to
include the "destuser", i.e. the uid
68 matches
Mail list logo