David M Lemcoe Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The MX Record was removed, and now when sending from a seperate e-mail
> server, I get an e-mail:
> "
> The following addresses had delivery problems:
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Permanent Failure: 554_5.7.1_<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:_Relay_access_den
It's not clear from your response that you understand why it's
failing. It would seem clear that postfix doesn't see this as a local
domain. Instead, it thinks you're trying to relay to somewhere else.
Check your virtual_mailbox_domains file (or database) and make sure it
has an entry for t
Does the log show that the incoming messages are actually received?
If not, it sounds like you're missing an MX record in DNS. If you are
seeing the message come in, what does the log say it did with it?
- Jon
On Nov 2, 2008, at 1:45 PM, mailing wrote:
I am using Postfix and /var/logs/m
David M Lemcoe Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am running Dovecot 1.0.10 and have it working great on ender.ath.cx (my
> free DynDNS.com subdomain), but recently I registered lemcoe.com and
> pointed it to the same IP address as ender.ath.cx. The problem is, only
> e-mail sent to the @ender.ath
What are you using as your MTA (i.e., which server is listening for
the incoming SMTP message)? Postfix? Sendmail?
Have you checked for errors at this level?
- Jon
On Nov 2, 2008, at 1:34 PM, David M Lemcoe Jr. wrote:
I am running Dovecot 1.0.10 and have it working great on
ender.ath.cx
I am running Dovecot 1.0.10 and have it working great on ender.ath.cx (my
free DynDNS.com subdomain), but recently I registered lemcoe.com and
pointed it to the same IP address as ender.ath.cx. The problem is, only
e-mail sent to the @ender.ath.cx works. If it is send it to @lemcoe.com, I
don't kn
I'm using Postfix, Amavisd-new/SpamAssassin, and Dovecot. They all run
on the same server (running Linux). The mailboxes are stored on the
same server in maildir format.
The logical path for incoming messages (as I understand it) is:
1) received by Postfix; handed off to Amavisd-new
2) Amavi
Sascha Wilde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 17:12 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>> > See
>>> > http://hg.intevation.org/kolab/dovecot-1.2_kolab-branch/rev/e83efa40a1dc
>>>
>>> The auth connection could be kept alive longer than for
Samba has pam_smbpass which is a PAM module that hooks into password
changing, and changes the users' samba password (presumably used for
NTLM auth?), when the users change their ordinary unix/linux password.
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=tree;f=source3/pam_smbpass;h=c230a1b239719
Proskurin Kirill schrieb:
> Hello all.
>
> I read al this tread and still wondering - what FS best to use to
> manage up to 1,5Tb of maildir spool and make a near to real time back up of
> it?
>
> Firstly i plan to make it all on FreeBSD with UFS2 and use rsync, but
> I never rsync such much of
Hello all.
I read al this tread and still wondering - what FS best to use to
manage up to 1,5Tb of maildir spool and make a near to real time back up of it?
Firstly i plan to make it all on FreeBSD with UFS2 and use rsync, but
I never rsync such much of space and files.
If using solaris best is
11 matches
Mail list logo
