Michael Dunne schrieb:
Greetings,
I have several users reporting that PDF attachments are coming in
corrupted. They are using either thunderbird or outlook on windows xp. I
have flushed the cache files for the users, but the problem still
persists. Could anyone offer some troubleshooting
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Good news, everyone!
The most annoying bug in v1.1 series should finally be fixed by these
patches:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/f28348c5201e
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/74c47fcfb420
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/a28520d26b5a
Hello all,
I've happily been using Dovecot for a couple of years now, but only a
couple of days ago I configured it to speak both TLS and SSL for both
POP3 and IMAP. Ideally I want users to use TLS, but I've enabled SSL,
because some mailers (at least Apple Mail on OS X Tiger) don't support
TLS.
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 11:46 +0100, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
could I ask when is planned to release new dovecot 1.1 version?
Let's see if I can get it done today..
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
If I leave the listen value as the default in /etc/dovecot.conf I'll
get a message similar to the following on each port that it tries to
open during startup:
# dovecot -F
Fatal: listen(::, 143) failed: Address already in use
If I set either:
listen = *
or
listen = [::]
then it will
Here is the reason of the login failure on Mac OS X (Server) when
using secondary short names:
the unix username is x_y, the additional short name (accepted for
authentication) is x.y:
Jan 6 15:38:58 dns dovecot[281]: Fatal: auth(default): BROKEN NSS
IMPLEMENTATION: getpwnam() lookup
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 16:02 +0100, Giuliano Gavazzi wrote:
Jan 6 15:38:58 dns dovecot[281]: Fatal: auth(default): BROKEN NSS
IMPLEMENTATION: getpwnam() lookup returned different user than was
requested (x_y != x.y).
..
This is not vital, but perhaps it is time to allow control on this
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 09:55 -0500, Bruce A. Mallett wrote:
If I leave the listen value as the default in /etc/dovecot.conf I'll
get a message similar to the following on each port that it tries to
open during startup:
# dovecot -F
Fatal: listen(::, 143) failed: Address already in use
If
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 14:59 +0100, Ed Schouten wrote:
I've happily been using Dovecot for a couple of years now, but only a
couple of days ago I configured it to speak both TLS and SSL for both
POP3 and IMAP. Ideally I want users to use TLS, but I've enabled SSL,
because some mailers (at least
Do you have more patches?
Yes. I'm polishing patch 10 now which is substantial. There will be
one or two more tiny patches after that.
* Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
Have you enabled non-plaintext authentication? If not, then
disable_plaintext_auth practically does what you want, because you can't
authenticate without SSL/TLS.
Oh, great. I don't know a lot of IMAP/POP3-internals, but I was unsure
whether
On T 6 Jan, 2009, at 16:08 , Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 16:02 +0100, Giuliano Gavazzi wrote:
Jan 6 15:38:58 dns dovecot[281]: Fatal: auth(default): BROKEN NSS
IMPLEMENTATION: getpwnam() lookup returned different user than was
requested (x_y != x.y).
..
This is not vital,
Hi Timo,
with
dovecot --version
1.2.alpha5
namespace shared {
separator = /
prefix = shared/%d/%%u/
subscriptions = yes
list = yes
}
and dovecot-acl
authenticated lr
in /usr/local/virtual/schetterer.com
%%u seems not expand to other existing users instead it expands to %
i
These are the last patches for now, and they're small. The base for
each of them is dovecot-1.1.7 + Apple patches 9 and 10, again not
because of a logical dependency but just because these patches change
parts of the earlier patches.
Patch #11 adds a few dtrace providers to key points in
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 00:05 +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
namespace shared {
separator = /
prefix = shared/%d/%%u/
subscriptions = yes
list = yes
}
..
%%u seems not expand to other existing users instead it expands to %
Worked last I tried. Show the whole dovecot -n output?
Sorry to bump so quickly but I have a handful of users who can't log in
at the moment and would like to get this fixed.
Am I missing a config option or is this a bug? The only reference I can
find in the mailing list archives is that this configuration should be
supported.
Karl.
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 17:06 -0600, Mike Abbott wrote:
Patch #11 adds a few dtrace providers to key points in the code. We
are still validating the correct placement and usefulness of these.
One cool thing about dtrace is that when not in use the hooks
literally are just a couple of
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 10:19 +1100, Karl Latiss wrote:
Jan 5 16:15:05 www-example1 dovecot: auth(default): ldap(julie.o
\'rei...@example.com,10.3.96.60): pass search: base=dc=example, dc=com
scope=subtree filter=((objectClass=qmailUser)(uid=julie.o\\'reilly))
field
s=mail,userPassword
I
First the good news: with these patches, the Next message
unexpectedly lost bugs I got so far were all caused reading a mbox
written by a previous version of dovecot.
So I think this time you really fixed the last annoying 1.1.x bug :)
Then another doubt: with these patches I'm still getting
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 18:33 -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 10:19 +1100, Karl Latiss wrote:
Jan 5 16:15:05 www-example1 dovecot: auth(default): ldap(julie.o
\'rei...@example.com,10.3.96.60): pass search: base=dc=example, dc=com
scope=subtree
Also I thought that your patch would only put the same user's
connections to the same process.
Our aim was high scalability so we had to mix users on processes. We
are aware of the security implications.
I could see a trinary state for this: off for the current behavior,
safe for the
Karl Latiss wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 18:33 -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 10:19 +1100, Karl Latiss wrote:
Jan 5 16:15:05 www-example1 dovecot: auth(default): ldap(julie.o
\'rei...@example.com,10.3.96.60): pass search: base=dc=example, dc=com
scope=subtree
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 16:04 -0800, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Karl Latiss wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 18:33 -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 10:19 +1100, Karl Latiss wrote:
Jan 5 16:15:05 www-example1 dovecot: auth(default): ldap(julie.o
\'rei...@example.com,10.3.96.60): pass
Karl Latiss wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 16:04 -0800, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Karl Latiss wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 18:33 -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 10:19 +1100, Karl Latiss wrote:
Jan 5 16:15:05 www-example1 dovecot: auth(default): ldap(julie.o
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 16:47 -0800, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Karl Latiss wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 16:04 -0800, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Karl Latiss wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 18:33 -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 10:19 +1100, Karl Latiss wrote:
Jan 5 16:15:05
On Jan 6, 2009, at 6:47 PM, Karl Latiss wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 18:33 -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 10:19 +1100, Karl Latiss wrote:
Jan 5 16:15:05 www-example1 dovecot: auth(default): ldap(julie.o
\'rei...@example.com,10.3.96.60): pass search: base=dc=example,
Karl Latiss wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 16:47 -0800, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Karl Latiss wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 16:04 -0800, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Karl Latiss wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 18:33 -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 10:19 +1100, Karl Latiss wrote:
Jan 5
Hi,
Up until yesterday, our environment which consists an NFS maildir file
store with multiple front end servers, was working fine. We've verified
that the server clocks and machines clocks are in sync.
Starting yesterday afternoon, We are getting ~850 log entries of the
form 'Timeout
28 matches
Mail list logo
