Re: [Dovecot] Default mbox file ownership and permissions with static userdb

2009-01-17 Thread Christian Kreibich
On Sat, 2009-01-17 at 19:57 -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote: > You'll get doveusers group by changing the gid to doveusers. To get > 660 permissions you can set umask=07 in dovecot.conf. The umask > changing is kind of a kludge and not really recommended, but currently > there's no better way. It

Re: [Dovecot] redirecting temp email files to another directory

2009-01-17 Thread Timo Sirainen
Give me an example of what a temp filename looks like? Also post your dovecot -n output. Because there shouldn't be any temp files. On Jan 17, 2009, at 8:10 PM, JANE CUA wrote: the temp files that is randomly created when the users accesses their email. I've only noticed this with the dovec

Re: [Dovecot] redirecting temp email files to another directory

2009-01-17 Thread JANE CUA
the temp files that is randomly created when the users accesses their email.  I've only noticed this with the dovecot 1.1.7 with squirrelmail server that I built.  I do not see the temp files created in the /var/spool/mail with the old UW-IMAP + squirrelmail. The last time I couldn't delete em

Re: [Dovecot] Possible Bug segnalation

2009-01-17 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Jan 16, 2009, at 4:37 AM, Claudio Prono wrote: It must have written it to dovecot-err.log. The code looks like this: i_error("Couldn't init INBOX: %s", errmsg); client_destroy(client, "Mailbox init failed"); So before logging the "Mailbox init failed" it always logs the

Re: [Dovecot] redirecting temp email files to another directory

2009-01-17 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Jan 17, 2009, at 8:00 PM, JANE CUA wrote: Hi, Is is possible to redirect temp email files to another folder like /tmp or somewhere else, instead of having it in the same /var/ spool where the mbox is? What "temp email files"?

[Dovecot] redirecting temp email files to another directory

2009-01-17 Thread JANE CUA
Hi,  Is is possible to redirect temp email files to another folder like /tmp or somewhere else, instead of having it in the same /var/spool where the mbox is?

Re: [Dovecot] Trouble with %d in args of passwd-file

2009-01-17 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Jan 16, 2009, at 3:48 PM, Nathan Hüsken wrote: test-user:{PLAIN}test:1002:100::/home/test-user:: a01 LOGIN test-u...@my-domain.de test .. passdb: driver: passwd-file args: /etc/vmail/%d/users userdb: driver: passwd-file args: /etc/vmail/%d/users For these set: args = username_for

Re: [Dovecot] Default mbox file ownership and permissions with static userdb

2009-01-17 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Jan 16, 2009, at 8:40 PM, Christian Kreibich wrote: Hi there! I'm using Dovecot 1.1.7 in a simple setup with a static userdb: userdb: driver: static args: uid=50018 gid=50019 home=/home/dovemail Instead of numbers you can here also use uid=dovemail gid=doveusers When my users crea

Re: [Dovecot] 1.1.9 release candidate

2009-01-17 Thread Tomasz Suchodolski
Timo Sirainen pisze: On Jan 17, 2009, at 6:43 PM, Tomasz Suchodolski wrote: --with-mysql This is necessary. :) --disable-ipv6 Why? I'm beginning to think it's time to remove this option entirely. Originally it was added because of buggy OSes, but those should be gone by now. I don't need

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot handling of over quota messages

2009-01-17 Thread mouss
Andrzej Adam Filip a écrit : > Timo Sirainen wrote: > >> On Jan 17, 2009, at 2:36 PM, Gary V wrote: >> >>> Then a bounce is created stating the mail was rejected: >>> >>> Your message to was automatically rejected: >>> Quota exceeded (mailbox for user is full). >>> >>> Question: is it possible (

Re: [Dovecot] 1.1.9 release candidate

2009-01-17 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Jan 17, 2009, at 6:43 PM, Tomasz Suchodolski wrote: --with-mysql This is necessary. :) --disable-ipv6 Why? I'm beginning to think it's time to remove this option entirely. Originally it was added because of buggy OSes, but those should be gone by now. I don't need this now and this is

Re: [Dovecot] 1.1.9 release candidate

2009-01-17 Thread Tomasz Suchodolski
Timo Sirainen pisze: On Jan 17, 2009, at 5:39 PM, Tomasz Suchodolski wrote: Timo Sirainen pisze: http://dovecot.org/tmp/dovecot-1.1.9.rc.tar.gz There are a couple of a bit larger changes, so would be nice if a few people tested this on different setups before I released the final v1.1.9. I h

Re: [Dovecot] 1.1.9 release candidate

2009-01-17 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Jan 17, 2009, at 5:39 PM, Tomasz Suchodolski wrote: Timo Sirainen pisze: http://dovecot.org/tmp/dovecot-1.1.9.rc.tar.gz There are a couple of a bit larger changes, so would be nice if a few people tested this on different setups before I released the final v1.1.9. I have compiled dovecot(o

Re: [Dovecot] 1.1.9 release candidate

2009-01-17 Thread Tomasz Suchodolski
Timo Sirainen pisze: http://dovecot.org/tmp/dovecot-1.1.9.rc.tar.gz There are a couple of a bit larger changes, so would be nice if a few people tested this on different setups before I released the final v1.1.9. I have compiled dovecot(on my test server) with these options: --with-notify=ino

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot discards mail over quota

2009-01-17 Thread Tomasz Suchodolski
Timo Sirainen pisze: On Jan 17, 2009, at 2:36 PM, Gary V wrote: Then a bounce is created stating the mail was rejected: Your message to was automatically rejected: Quota exceeded (mailbox for user is full). Question: is it possible (without changing code) to alter this to where deliver would

Re: [Dovecot] 1.1.9 release candidate

2009-01-17 Thread Mark Sapiro
Timo Sirainen wrote: >http://dovecot.org/tmp/dovecot-1.1.9.rc.tar.gz > >There are a couple of a bit larger changes, so would be nice if a few >people tested this on different setups before I released the final >v1.1.9. It's running here without problem as a pop3 server. -- Mark Sapiro

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot discards mail over quota

2009-01-17 Thread Gary V
On 1/17/09, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Jan 17, 2009, at 2:36 PM, Gary V wrote: > > > Then a bounce is created stating the mail was rejected: > > > > Your message to was automatically rejected: > > Quota exceeded (mailbox for user is full). > > > > Question: is it possible (without changing code) to

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot handling of over quota messages

2009-01-17 Thread Andrzej Adam Filip
Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Jan 17, 2009, at 2:36 PM, Gary V wrote: > >> Then a bounce is created stating the mail was rejected: >> >> Your message to was automatically rejected: >> Quota exceeded (mailbox for user is full). >> >> Question: is it possible (without changing code) to alter this to >

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot discards mail over quota

2009-01-17 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Jan 17, 2009, at 2:36 PM, Gary V wrote: Then a bounce is created stating the mail was rejected: Your message to was automatically rejected: Quota exceeded (mailbox for user is full). Question: is it possible (without changing code) to alter this to where deliver would instead tempfail or s

[Dovecot] Dovecot discards mail over quota

2009-01-17 Thread Gary V
I'm new to Dovecot, using 1.1.8 and I just wanted to verify that what I am observing is the intended behavior. I'm using Maildir++ quota. When a message is delivered to a mailbox that cannot accept the message because it would place them over the quota limit, deliver states to the MTA that the mess

Re: [Dovecot] Can imap IDLE be disabled?

2009-01-17 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Jan 17, 2009, at 2:14 PM, Ed Ewing wrote: Are you sure disabling IDLE helps with that? AFAIK most clients keep persistent connections to server regardless of their ability to IDLE. No expert here but netstat shows persistent established connections for users with blackberrys. Ah, ok

Re: [Dovecot] Can imap IDLE be disabled?

2009-01-17 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Jan 17, 2009, at 2:03 PM, Ed Ewing wrote: On 1/17/2009 10:58 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On Jan 17, 2009, at 1:56 PM, Ed Ewing wrote: Have looked through all of the config options in the wiki and don't see a reference to turning off IDLE similar to courier's capability. Is it possible?

Re: [Dovecot] Can imap IDLE be disabled?

2009-01-17 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Jan 17, 2009, at 1:56 PM, Ed Ewing wrote: Have looked through all of the config options in the wiki and don't see a reference to turning off IDLE similar to courier's capability. Is it possible? No. Why do you want to disable it?

[Dovecot] Can imap IDLE be disabled?

2009-01-17 Thread Ed Ewing
Have looked through all of the config options in the wiki and don't see a reference to turning off IDLE similar to courier's capability. Is it possible? Thanks for any pointers. Using version 1.1.6

Re: [Dovecot] Procmail + Dovecot

2009-01-17 Thread Mark Nyqvist Hjarding
Andrzej Adam Filip writes: > Does dovecot's deliver report something more in the log files? > I remember on my installation it has been very picky about missing > postmaster_address in configuration file even when executed with -e. > > http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA Thank you for pointing me to the