Tom Sommer wrote:
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 09:53 +0100, Tom Sommer wrote:
>>
>>> sql(u...@example.com,127.0.0.1): query: SELECT username as user,
>>> plainpassword as password, nopassword FROM cyrususers WHERE username
>>> = 'u...@example.com' AND password = PASSWORD('SECRE
Curtis Maloney wrote:
> Phillip Macey wrote:
>>> Oh, we serve Maildir via Dovecot IMAP and 5000 messages per folder
>>> are a wimp. Problems start if the user:
>
>> We are having some performancec issues on our server at the moment -
>> all I can put it down to is the large size of some maildirs.
Richard Hobbs wrote:
> Curtis Maloney wrote:
>> Phillip Macey wrote:
Oh, we serve Maildir via Dovecot IMAP and 5000 messages per folder
are a wimp. Problems start if the user:
>>> We are having some performancec issues on our server at the moment -
>>> all I can put it down to is the larg
Seth Mattinen wrote:
> Phillip Macey wrote:
>> On 14/05/2009 5:11 PM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
>>> On Wed, 13 May 2009, Richard Hobbs wrote:
The main complaint we have from users is that their IMAP Inbox, with
5000 emails in it takes ages to appear, and no amount of coaxing will
convinc
Richard Hobbs wrote:
> Seth Mattinen wrote:
>> Phillip Macey wrote:
>>> On 14/05/2009 5:11 PM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2009, Richard Hobbs wrote:
> The main complaint we have from users is that their IMAP Inbox, with
> 5000 emails in it takes ages to appear, and no amount
Dear all,
back in January I posted about migration from courier and in
particular on the script courier-dovecot-migrate.pl.
That script had a bug on BSD (or should I say not-Linux?) type
systems*. On FreeBSD (6.1) and MacOSX (10.5) it appended a lot of
binary garbage at the end of dovecot-k
On F 15 May, 2009, at 09:39 , Seth Mattinen wrote:
This raises an interesting question for me actually... given that
we've
now decided dovecot and maildir is the way forward for us, which
delivery method should we use in exim? exim can support maildir,
(right?) and so can dovecot, so should i
On May 14, 2009, at 2:17 PM, Stewart Dean wrote:
Warning: fd limit 2000 is lower than what Dovecot can use under full
load (more than 2054). Either grow the limit or change
login_max_processes_count and max_mail_processes settings
So I changed the no_size and no_size_hard to 3500 and 4000
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 15 May 2009, Giuliano Gavazzi wrote:
well, using an LDA makes a little more cumbersome to check the local
recipient at RCPT time.
Huh? exim won't try local deliver unless it has decided it is a local
recipient. You won't get overquota sta
Seth Mattinen wrote:
> Richard Hobbs wrote:
>> Curtis Maloney wrote:
>>> Phillip Macey wrote:
> Oh, we serve Maildir via Dovecot IMAP and 5000 messages per folder
> are a wimp. Problems start if the user:
We are having some performancec issues on our server at the moment -
all I c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 11:28:42AM +, Richard Hobbs wrote:
[...]
> > Only dovecot 'deliver' will update the index on delivery.
>
> Do does this mean that it's slightly slower to actually deliver the mail
> with dovecot (because it's writing two
Seth Mattinen wrote:
> Richard Hobbs wrote:
>> Seth Mattinen wrote:
>>> Phillip Macey wrote:
On 14/05/2009 5:11 PM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> On Wed, 13 May 2009, Richard Hobbs wrote:
>> The main complaint we have from users is that their IMAP Inbox, with
>> 5000 emails in it takes a
Seth Mattinen, 2009-05-15 09:39:
(right?) and so can dovecot, so should i use dovecot's "deliver"
mechanism, or exim's own internal mechanism?
Only dovecot 'deliver' will update the index on delivery.
That's obvious. But dovecot (AFAIK) updates (not rebuilds) indexes when
it sees new message
I use public namespace for group mailboxes. Users are able to create
subfolders , but its impossible to delete them. thunderbird 2.0.0.21
complains: "Cant' rename mailbox to another storage type", both
namespaces (private and public) use same storage type, so I believe
that it's a namespace problem
Doing a cursory Google scan on journaled Linux filesystems, it seems
that the three ground-up journaled FSes: XFS, reiser and JFS all have
their separate strong points but all compare favorably. Reiser does a
better job with many small files...which would seem to be the reality of
maildir for
On F 15 May, 2009, at 12:30 , Steffen Kaiser wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009, Giuliano Gavazzi wrote:
well, using an LDA makes a little more cumbersome to check the
local recipient at RCPT time.
Huh? exim won't try local deliver unless it has decided it is a
local recipient. You won't get ove
In my config that has worked for some time I have:
namespace private {
separator = /
prefix = ~/
hidden = yes
list = no # for v1.1+
}
1 list "~/" *
1 OK List completed.
2 list "~/" %
2 OK List completed.
I _think_ that the last time I tested this was 2 weeks ago but it
might have be
On 5/15/2009, Stewart Dean (sd...@bard.edu) wrote:
> Reiser does a better job with many small files...which would seem to
> be the reality of maildir formatted inboxes.
> Any comments on that?
I have been using Reiserfs3 on my mail server (maildir format) for 4
years, with zero problems, even afte
Citando Timo Sirainen :
> 1. You notice a non-text/* content-type and initialize text extraction
> for the MIME part. Like:
>
> struct attachment_extract_context *
> attachment_extract_init(const char *content_type);
>
> 2. After this you feed all the input belonging to that MIME part to:
>
> in
Richard Hobbs wrote:
>
> Trouble is... i've been googling this as well, just now, and loads of
> people say XFS has the better performance, but loads of other people say
> ReiserFS has the better performance.
It starts to become a religious argument at some point.
> We have battery backed up RAI
Dovecot-1.1.14 on Mac OS X.
Panic: IMAP(user): file cmd-append.c: line 266
(cmd_append_continue_parsing): assertion failed: (ctx->count == uid2 -
uid1 + 1)
Trivially reproducible:
$ telnet mailserver 143
a login user password
b append inbox
Backtrace:
0 libSystem.B.dylib
On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 12:00 -0500, Mike Abbott wrote:
> Dovecot-1.1.14 on Mac OS X.
> Panic: IMAP(user): file cmd-append.c: line 266
> (cmd_append_continue_parsing): assertion failed: (ctx->count == uid2 -
> uid1 + 1)
>
> Trivially reproducible:
> $ telnet mailserver 143
> a login user passwor
On May 14, 2009, at 2:17 PM, Stewart Dean wrote:
The only changes was that max_mail_processes went from 1024 to
1280. Now I get a error message when I start DC:
Warning: fd limit 2000 is lower than what Dovecot can use under full
load (more than 2054). Either grow the limit or change
Maybe it's a D'uh for everyone else, but the reason I wasn't getting
anywhere when I increased the no_size and no_size_hard (and confirmed
that it had changed using the lsuser cmd) was that a) it needed to be
done against root, not dovecot and b) I had to exit root and re-login
for that to be p
Wonder if anyone else has actually noticed this and has some kind of
statistics?
http://marc.info/?t=12423400331&r=1&w=2
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
LDAP auth backend in Dovecot 1.1.5 seemingly fails to handle certain
paths of interaction with LDAP server, which is Windows AD running
Windows 2003 server machine in my case.
The symptoms I observe look exactly as were already reported in [1]:
authentication backend "hangs" after logging the
* Timo Sirainen :
> Wonder if anyone else has actually noticed this and has some kind of
> statistics?
>
> http://marc.info/?t=12423400331&r=1&w=2
I could run stats here, with 12.000 users to see what the average size
is...
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung
On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 22:58 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Timo Sirainen :
> > Wonder if anyone else has actually noticed this and has some kind of
> > statistics?
> >
> > http://marc.info/?t=12423400331&r=1&w=2
>
> I could run stats here, with 12.000 users to see what the average size
>
on 5-15-2009 11:59 AM Timo Sirainen spake the following:
> Wonder if anyone else has actually noticed this and has some kind of
> statistics?
>
> http://marc.info/?t=12423400331&r=1&w=2
>
One could always run the mailstore on LVM and then you could snapshot the
mount and then fsck it while st
On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 17:13 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > I could run stats here, with 12.000 users to see what the average size
> > is...
>
> It would be interesting to have some kind of statistics for cur/
> directories and get divided by cur> and then see how many users have values that are
30 matches
Mail list logo
