Patrick Ben Koetter schrieb:
> * Robert Schetterer :
but with autocreate and global sieve rules you can implement a pseudo
standart
i use tbs one and configure horde/imp like tb does it, in my meaning
big players have no intension bring up even a pseudo standart
cause they
Hi,
I'm planning on a new mail infrastructure which constists of multiple
'frontends' running webmail & public access pop/imap, which would communicate
over imap/pop to 'backend mail stores'. My original idea was to run dovecot
on the backends, use a predition on the frontends to proxy imap/pop
About 5 mins after I sent that email I remembered about bincimapd. It
works great, should have used it from the beginning.
I don't get the point of not just using vchkpw instead of trying to
use libvpopmail, but hey, I'm dumb. ;)
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 06:55:29AM -0700, Eric Shubert wrote:
>
Quoting Mario Antonio :
Any good documentation regarding building a RHCS with GFS over DRBD
...? (or just the Rethat web site ..)
I've got my internal docs, which I could be talked into sharing...
Other than that, the Red Hat docs and the DRBD docs are the best source.
Not a lot out there.
J
Andreas Ntaflos schreef:
As explained, in the user's sieve script the "keep" after the redirect
action is ignored when the backup mails script uses an explicit "keep"
after "fileinto", but not when "fileinto" is used with "copy".
Why?
Because you have tripped a bug that is fixed in the reposi
Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
It seems that there is no standard for folder names that deal with typical
message classes such as drafts, outbox, sent, spam etc. At least there's no
common sense on a naming convention that tells how client should handle this.
Worse than this, most IMAP clients auto-
* Robert Schetterer :
> >> but with autocreate and global sieve rules you can implement a pseudo
> >> standart
> >> i use tbs one and configure horde/imp like tb does it, in my meaning
> >> big players have no intension bring up even a pseudo standart
> >> cause they want users to use their own mai
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 12:33:21PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Axel Thimm schrieb:
> > Given than you seem to bless Apple Mail folder structures it makes it
> > a good candidate to try to push as a standard for others to
> > copy. Maybe there could be example setups/configs shipped with
* Ed W :
> Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
>> It seems that there is no standard for folder names that deal with typical
>> message classes such as drafts, outbox, sent, spam etc. At least there's no
>> common sense on a naming convention that tells how client should handle this.
>>
>> Worse than this,
* Rob Middleton :
> On 25/09/2009 11:14 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> >It seems that there is no standard for folder names that deal with typical
> >message classes such as drafts, outbox, sent, spam etc. At least there's no
> >common sense on a naming convention that tells how client should han
Axel Thimm schrieb:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 07:55:41PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> On Sep 25, 2009, at 7:49 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
>>
>>> Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sep 25, 2009, at 4:14 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> Has anyone seen an approach or a solution that solves the problem
On 26/09/2009 6:40 PM, Axel Thimm wrote:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 07:55:41PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sep 25, 2009, at 7:49 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sep 25, 2009, at 4:14 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
Has anyone seen an approach or a so
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 11:40:21AM +0300, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 07:55:41PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > On Sep 25, 2009, at 7:49 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
> >
> >> Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >>> On Sep 25, 2009, at 4:14 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> Has anyone seen an app
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 07:55:41PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Sep 25, 2009, at 7:49 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
>
>> Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>> On Sep 25, 2009, at 4:14 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
Has anyone seen an approach or a solution that solves the problem
from a users
poi
Rob Middleton schrieb:
> On 25/09/2009 11:14 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
>> It seems that there is no standard for folder names that deal with
>> typical
>> message classes such as drafts, outbox, sent, spam etc. At least
>> there's no
>> common sense on a naming convention that tells how client
Patrick Ben Koetter schrieb:
> * Robert Schetterer :
>> Patrick Ben Koetter schrieb:
>>> It seems that there is no standard for folder names that deal with typical
>>> message classes such as drafts, outbox, sent, spam etc. At least there's no
>>> common sense on a naming convention that tells how
On 25/09/2009 11:14 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
It seems that there is no standard for folder names that deal with typical
message classes such as drafts, outbox, sent, spam etc. At least there's no
common sense on a naming convention that tells how client should handle this.
XLIST may de
Patrick Ben Koetter schrieb:
> * Charles Marcus :
>> On 9/25/2009, Stefan Förster (cite+dovecot-us...@incertum.net) wrote:
Has anyone seen an approach or a solution that solves the problem from a
users
point of view? A server side alias list that maps to a server standard?
>>> Tried
18 matches
Mail list logo
