Quoting Rick Romero :
See that last line there??? Want to bet something in the mail setup
(MTA, dovecot, system jobs like backup, etc) put an exclusive lock on
files from time to time?
I thought the entire reason (ok not the _entire_ reason but..) for
Maildir was to avoid locks and allow eas
Jerry wrote:
Is it possible to use the 'redirect' function in 'sieve' to forward a
message as an attachment rather than in-line?
Unfortunately, no. I thought the (draft) enclose extension could provide
this new feature, but the specification explicitly excludes redirect
from being affected:
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 15:35 -0500, Rick Romero wrote:
> I thought the entire reason (ok not the _entire_ reason but..) for
> Maildir was to avoid locks and allow easy concurrent access to a
> mailbox through many different applications.
>
> From DJB's page: http://cr.yp.to/proto/maildir.html
Is it possible to use the 'redirect' function in 'sieve' to forward a
message as an attachment rather than in-line?
--
Jerry
ges...@yahoo.com
|===
|===
|===
|===
|
A woman was in love with fourteen soldiers, it was clearly platoonic.
Quoting "Eric Rostetter" :
Quoting Rick Romero :
They claim to be real-time, and with kernel hooks into
reads/writes, it seems promising to run on top of the OS..
Yes, but that doesn't mean it will work in the cluster environment...
It also says things like:
There are different types of
"Frank Behrens" wrote:
> Andrzej Adam Filip wrote on 21 Oct 2009 20:02:
>> Dovecot's design issues to consider are as follows:
>> a) making dovecot support hash/btree/dbm maps for passwd/userdb
>>[AFAIR Timo stated it is too complicated to be "cost effective" from
>>his perspective]
>> b)
Here are the requestet information.
It was compiled with inotify which is the default on my system.
First I thought, it was the purpose, that the mailbox dirs was
on an NFS. Then copied to the local disc. But the same.
[r...@mail ~]# /opt/dovecot/sbin/dovecot --build-options
Build options: ioloo
Timo Sirainen пишет:
On Oct 21, 2009, at 11:09 AM, Proskurin Kirill wrote:
No. :-(
#fgrep 'mail_location' /usr/local/etc/dovecot.conf | fgrep -v #
mail_location = maildir:/var/spool/dovecot/domains/%d/%n
mail_location = /var/spool/dovecot/domains/%d/%n/
Second hit - it is a sieve rules part.
Andrzej Adam Filip wrote on 21 Oct 2009 20:02:
> Dovecot's design issues to consider are as follows:
> a) making dovecot support hash/btree/dbm maps for passwd/userdb
>[AFAIR Timo stated it is too complicated to be "cost effective" from
>his perspective]
> b) making dovecot support sendmai
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 21:28 +0200, Ingo Thierack wrote:
> Hello,
>
> is my understanding of the parameter "imap_idle_notify_interval" right,
> if i say,
> it's the time between two point where dovecot tells the client he is
> here, and
> sould have nothing directly todo with the notification of ne
Hello,
is my understanding of the parameter "imap_idle_notify_interval" right,
if i say,
it's the time between two point where dovecot tells the client he is
here, and
sould have nothing directly todo with the notification of new mails arrived.
I played with the values around. And the courios is,
Quoting Rick Romero :
They claim to be real-time, and with kernel hooks into reads/writes,
it seems promising to run on top of the OS..
Yes, but that doesn't mean it will work in the cluster environment...
It also says things like:
There are different types of file locks. In addition to t
"Frank Behrens" wrote:
> Andrzej Adam Filip wrote on 21 Oct 2009 9:21:
>> It is possible to "significantly" twist sendmail.cf use $h to select
>> dovecot's mailbox and $u to pass user+det...@domain (one *or many*).
>> [ BTW the way I think about will make sendmail support "aliases with
>> domain
Quoting Hugo Monteiro :
Anyone used FileReplicationPro? I'm more interested in low
bandwidth, 'cheaper', replication.
Rick
If data consistency isn't a must, you can always perform timed rsyncs.
Yes, but if there is a lot of data, FileReplicationPro is more efficient
than an rsync. Of c
Quoting "Eric Jon Rostetter" :
Quoting Rick Romero :
Anyone used FileReplicationPro? I'm more interested in low
bandwidth, 'cheaper', replication.
Might work for an active-failover setup, but since I use active-active I
need something like DRBD instead.
Personally I wouldn't trust it for
Quoting Rick Romero :
Anyone used FileReplicationPro? I'm more interested in low
bandwidth, 'cheaper', replication.
Might work for an active-failover setup, but since I use active-active I
need something like DRBD instead.
Personally I wouldn't trust it for cluster type situations, and I k
Andrzej Adam Filip wrote on 21 Oct 2009 9:21:
> It is possible to "significantly" twist sendmail.cf use $h to select
> dovecot's mailbox and $u to pass user+det...@domain (one *or many*).
> [ BTW the way I think about will make sendmail support "alises with
> domains" instead
> of current "alias
On 10/21/09 8:59 AM, "Guy" wrote:
> Our current setup uses two NFS mounts accessed simultaneously by two
> servers. Our load balancing tries to keep a user on the same server whenever
> possible. Initially we just had roundrobin load balancing which led to index
> corruption.
> The problems we've
2009/10/21 Timo Sirainen
> On Oct 20, 2009, at 4:47 AM, Thomas Hummel wrote:
>
> If you do it, you'll most likely see some random index related errors.
>>>
>>
>> But are index related errors recoverable (does dovecot notice and fix it
>> dynamically ?) or will they cause client-side corruption ?
On Oct 20, 2009, at 4:47 AM, Thomas Hummel wrote:
If you do it, you'll most likely see some random index related
errors.
But are index related errors recoverable (does dovecot notice and
fix it
dynamically ?) or will they cause client-side corruption ?
How bad would that corruption be ? (
On Oct 21, 2009, at 11:09 AM, Proskurin Kirill wrote:
No. :-(
#fgrep 'mail_location' /usr/local/etc/dovecot.conf | fgrep -v #
mail_location = maildir:/var/spool/dovecot/domains/%d/%n
mail_location = /var/spool/dovecot/domains/%d/%n/
Second hit - it is a sieve rules part.
What do you mean? The
Hugo Monteiro wrote:
Proskurin Kirill wrote:
Pascal Volk wrote:
On 10/21/2009 01:08 PM Proskurin Kirill wrote:
Hello.
Today i found what maildir autocreation stop work.
May be after upgrade to 1.2. Here logs:
…
Oct 21 11:01:25 deliver(shershov...@fxclub.org): Info: maildir
autodetect:
stat(
Proskurin Kirill wrote:
Pascal Volk wrote:
On 10/21/2009 01:08 PM Proskurin Kirill wrote:
Hello.
Today i found what maildir autocreation stop work.
May be after upgrade to 1.2. Here logs:
…
Oct 21 11:01:25 deliver(shershov...@fxclub.org): Info: maildir
autodetect:
stat(/var/spool/dovecot/dom
Pascal Volk wrote:
On 10/21/2009 01:08 PM Proskurin Kirill wrote:
Hello.
Today i found what maildir autocreation stop work.
May be after upgrade to 1.2. Here logs:
…
Oct 21 11:01:25 deliver(shershov...@fxclub.org): Info: maildir autodetect:
stat(/var/spool/dovecot/domains/fxclub.org/shershov-o
On 10/21/2009 01:08 PM Proskurin Kirill wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Today i found what maildir autocreation stop work.
> May be after upgrade to 1.2. Here logs:
> …
> Oct 21 11:01:25 deliver(shershov...@fxclub.org): Info: maildir autodetect:
> stat(/var/spool/dovecot/domains/fxclub.org/shershov-oa//cur)
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 07:42:14 -0500
> Von: "Rick Romero"
> An: "Dovecot Mailing List" , "Seth Mattinen"
>
> CC: dovecot@dovecot.org
> Betreff: Re: [Dovecot] HA Dovecot Config?
> Quoting "Seth Mattinen" :
>
> > Eric Rostetter wrote:
> >>
> >> For IMAP
Rick Romero wrote:
Quoting "Seth Mattinen" :
Eric Rostetter wrote:
For IMAP to be truely HA, you will need shared storage of some sort.
You can "emulate" a SAN with something like DRBD if budget doesn't
allow a
real SAN (that is what I do).
I can vouch for DRBD too. It works quite well
Quoting "Seth Mattinen" :
Eric Rostetter wrote:
For IMAP to be truely HA, you will need shared storage of some sort.
You can "emulate" a SAN with something like DRBD if budget doesn't allow a
real SAN (that is what I do).
I can vouch for DRBD too. It works quite well.
~Seth
Anyone us
Hello.
Today i found what maildir autocreation stop work.
May be after upgrade to 1.2. Here logs:
Oct 21 11:01:25 deliver(shershov...@fxclub.org): Info: Loading modules
from directory: /usr/local/lib/dovecot/lda
Oct 21 11:01:25 deliver(shershov...@fxclub.org): Info: Module loaded:
/usr/local/
Problem was solve Thank you.
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:47:25AM +0200, Thomas Hummel wrote:
> > Actual mail content should be safe.
So you seem to say that indexes files would probably get "corrupted" but that
clients wouldn't notice it ?
I'm trying to figure out how to use imap-test test script-ing to test this.
Any sugge
"Frank Behrens" wrote:
> When I upgraded my old, long running dovecot 1.1 to newer dovecot-1.2.4 +
> doevecot-sieve-
> 0.1.12 I observed a change in destination address (-a) parsing.
>
> Old behaviour:
> When Timo introduced this feature
> (http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2007-September/02581
Eric Rostetter wrote:
>
> For IMAP to be truely HA, you will need shared storage of some sort.
>
>
> You can "emulate" a SAN with something like DRBD if budget doesn't allow a
> real SAN (that is what I do).
>
I can vouch for DRBD too. It works quite well.
~Seth
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:55 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Can someone find an OS where the attached program doesn't work? It
> should print "success". So far tested for success: Linux 2.6, Solaris
> 10, FreeBSD 7.2, OpenBSD 4.2.
>
>
FreeBSD 6.4 --> success
--
Best regards,
Odhiambo WASHINGTON,
34 matches
Mail list logo
