Re: [Dovecot] body search very slow since upgrade from 1.0.15 to 1.2.10

2010-02-27 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Timo Sirainen put forth on 2/25/2010 1:04 PM: On 24.2.2010, at 20.27, Timo Sirainen wrote: Looks like there's something very wrong with mbox with v1.2+. It's doing a *lot* of message header parsing work that doesn't happen with v1.1 or with other mailbox formats. Probably because I fixed

[Dovecot] Possible CPU Denial-Of-Service attack to dovecot IMAP.

2010-02-27 Thread Kostik
Hi All! Some time ago, we received e-mail message, which makes our server CPU exhaustion attack. --- PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+COMMAND 26319 5751796 20 0 2868 1868 1484 R 99.2 0.1 22:04.77 imap --- It happens when I try open mail folder with this buggy

Re: [Dovecot] any limitations running on a Mac?

2010-02-27 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Terry Barnum put forth on 2/26/2010 4:20 PM: The 500MB+, 5k+ message problem is with another mailserver not running postfix/dovecot. It's the reason I've started investigating postfix with your software and so far Im very happy. Hi Terry, If it is remotely a possibility, I'd recommend

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 2.0b3 IDLE not advertised

2010-02-27 Thread Jerry
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:37:59 -0500 Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com articulated: On 2/26/2010 6:54 PM, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: The main difference seems to be that 1.2 advertises IDLE in capabilities before authentication, but 2.0 does not: Correct... and according to Timo, this

Re: [Dovecot] IMAP Folders Don't Make Sense

2010-02-27 Thread Baptiste Malguy
Hello, Le 27/02/10 09:45, Stan Hoeppner a écrit : Brian Hayden put forth on 2/25/2010 3:10 PM: To add insult to injury, mailbox migration from Exch 5.5 IMAP to Dovecot IMAP was done using TB as the conduit, simply copying folders from one account to another. Took forever, but it was the

Re: [Dovecot] IMAP Folders Don't Make Sense

2010-02-27 Thread Brian Hayden
On Feb 27 2010, Stan Hoeppner wrote: Brian Hayden put forth on 2/25/2010 3:10 PM: particularly if the subscriptions file is in an unreliable state (as it sounds like yours is--as most of them almost always are). I guess I'm lucky so far Brian. I've had no subscription problems with TB +

Re: [Dovecot] IMAP Folders Don't Make Sense

2010-02-27 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Brian Hayden put forth on 2/27/2010 8:28 AM: On Feb 27 2010, Stan Hoeppner wrote: To add insult to injury, mailbox migration from Exch 5.5 IMAP to Dovecot IMAP was done using TB as the conduit, simply copying folders from one account to another. Took forever, but it was the only reliable way

Re: [Dovecot] IMAP Folders Don't Make Sense

2010-02-27 Thread Jerry
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 09:11:52 -0600 Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com articulated: Brian Hayden put forth on 2/27/2010 8:28 AM: On Feb 27 2010, Stan Hoeppner wrote: To add insult to injury, mailbox migration from Exch 5.5 IMAP to Dovecot IMAP was done using TB as the conduit, simply

Re: [Dovecot] panic in istream-raw-mbox.c - 2.0.beta3+

2010-02-27 Thread Mark Sapiro
Mark Sapiro wrote: Timo Sirainen wrote: On 23.2.2010, at 7.04, Mark Sapiro wrote: Feb 22 20:44:47 sbh16 dovecot: imap(mark): Panic: file istream-raw-mbox.c: line503 (istream_raw_mbox_get_start_offset): assertion failed: (rstream-seeked) I think this fixes it:

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 2.0b3 IDLE not advertised

2010-02-27 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 27.2.2010, at 1.54, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: The main difference seems to be that 1.2 advertises IDLE in capabilities before authentication, but 2.0 does not: http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2010-February/047011.html explains this a bit better. I'll add IDLE to pre-login capabilities if I

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 2.0b3 IDLE not advertised

2010-02-27 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Hi, Do you think there's any chance of getting Profimail fixed by reporting this as a bug for them? Other new servers besides Dovecot behave in a similar way. I'll try. They are pretty active in development, but god knows how they handle support queries. I've raised the issue with their

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 2.0b3 IDLE not advertised

2010-02-27 Thread Ed W
On 27/02/2010 17:07, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 27.2.2010, at 1.54, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: The main difference seems to be that 1.2 advertises IDLE in capabilities before authentication, but 2.0 does not: http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2010-February/047011.html explains this a bit

Re: [Dovecot] any limitations running on a Mac?

2010-02-27 Thread Terry Barnum
On Feb 27, 2010, at 2:08 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: Terry Barnum put forth on 2/26/2010 4:20 PM: The 500MB+, 5k+ message problem is with another mailserver not running postfix/dovecot. It's the reason I've started investigating postfix with your software and so far Im very happy. Hi

[Dovecot] client cert handling not working properly on centos 4.8

2010-02-27 Thread zhong ming wu
Dear List I've successfully installed/configured dovecot 1.2.10 with require client cert on centos 5.4 and ubuntu server 9.10 I also need to install on centos 4.8 and after the following the exact same procedure I can only get it working if I commented out ssl_require_client_cert =yes and