Dear list,
I have questions about content of the following error messages.
---/var/log/secure---
dovecot-auth: PAM unable todlopen(/lib/security/pam_nologin.so)
dovecot-auth: PAM [error:/lib/security/pam_nologin.so: cannot open shared
object file: Too many open files]
dovecot-auth: PAM adding
On 26.3.2010, at 8.27, Masaharu Kawada wrote:
dovecot: auth(default): pam(x...@xxx.com,127.0.0.1): pipe() failed: Too many
open files
..
From the above result, dovecot-auth proccess opened 10243
files, and that seems to be the limit. So I expect that
adding following lines into
On 26.3.2010, at 4.47, Scott Ellis wrote:
I built and install Dovecot 2.0Beta4 on my NetBSD/amd64-current system, and
am seeing the user-owned imap processes busy-looping. In Dovecot 1.2.x (and
1.x and 0.x..) I force ionotify and ioloop to kqueue, so I suspected that was
the problem.
Hi Timo-san,
Thank you very much for your response!
How many dovecot-auth processes were there running? Unless there were
1024 dovecot-auth processes, it sounds
more like a file descriptor leak and adding more fds will only delay
the error.
According to the result of a command ps aux, only
On 26.3.2010, at 10.47, Masaharu Kawada wrote:
How many dovecot-auth processes were there running? Unless there were 1024
dovecot-auth processes, it sounds
more like a file descriptor leak and adding more fds will only delay the
error.
According to the result of a command ps aux, only
On 25.3.2010, at 11.24, Andre Hübner wrote:
i use successfully mysql-quotasystem with dovecot 1.2.11 on different servers
except for mysql 4.0 servers
dovecot internally uses sql: ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE which was introduced
in mysql 4.1
The original code supported dict-sql only if ON
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 21:50 -0700, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
On Mar 25, 2010, at 9:48 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Timo Sirainen put forth on 3/25/2010 1:30 PM:
I think the next v2.0 release (rc1?) will include the new changed
default_login_user. I'm still not completely sure what it is
Heya,
we have two IMAP (UW-imap and dovecot) servers accessing the same mbox files
for our users (don't ask why) and sometimes the UW-imap corrupts the mbox file.
The mbox looks just like normal mbox except it does not have the proper 'From '
beginning of the file (usually there are some
Hello,
i use successfully mysql-quotasystem with dovecot 1.2.11 on different
servers except for mysql 4.0 servers
dovecot internally uses sql: ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE which was
introduced in mysql 4.1
The original code supported dict-sql only if ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE was
supported by
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 20:01 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
dovehole - you go inside dovecot via a hole, right?
That is downright pornographic. dovehole - lovehole?
dovenest isn't totally horrible (close), but dovehole is ...
just not
right at all.
dovetail
+1
Tail just
I am trying to configure dovecot-1.2.11 to have the same IMAP namespacing as
courier-imap as per http://wiki.dovecot.org/Migration/Courier, but failing
badly.
I have a test maildir with INBOX and folder 'junk'. Without fiddling with
namespaces, this works fine: there are 91 msgs in INBOX and 2 in
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 13:27 +0100, Jernej Porenta wrote:
Heya,
we have two IMAP (UW-imap and dovecot) servers accessing the same mbox
files for our users (don't ask why) and sometimes the UW-imap corrupts
the mbox file. The mbox looks just like normal mbox except it does not
have the proper
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 12:36 +, Brian Candler wrote:
Now I make the following addition to dovecot.conf:
namespace private {
separator = .
prefix = INBOX.
inbox = yes
hidden = no
}
After this the inbox appears to be empty, and I cannot select the junk
folder at all:
Hi,
is it expected that dovecot 2.0.beta4 pass all of it's self-tests or some
failures are normal?
I've tried make check and everything passed up to this test:
...
message_date_parse(7) : ok
0 / 8 tests failed
test-message-decoder.c:67: Assert
On Mar 26, 2010, at 1:39 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 13:27 +0100, Jernej Porenta wrote:
Heya,
we have two IMAP (UW-imap and dovecot) servers accessing the same mbox
files for our users (don't ask why) and sometimes the UW-imap corrupts
the mbox file. The mbox looks just
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 02:45:40PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
After this the inbox appears to be empty, and I cannot select the junk
folder at all:
Something's seriously wrong. Just changing namespace prefix shouldn't do
anything like that. (And since I haven't heard of horror stories of
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 14:13 +0100, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
Hi,
is it expected that dovecot 2.0.beta4 pass all of it's self-tests or some
failures are normal?
Tarballs are built with make distcheck, which would fail if any of the
self-tests failed.
message_date_parse(7)
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 16:28 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
message_date_parse(7) : ok
0 / 8 tests failed
test-message-decoder.c:67: Assert failed:
message_decoder_decode_next_block(ctx, input, output)
I can't reproduce this with
Timo Sirainen ha scritto:
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 20:01 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
dovehole - you go inside dovecot via a hole, right?
That is downright pornographic. dovehole - lovehole?
dovenest isn't totally horrible (close), but dovehole is ...
just not
right at all.
dovetail
+1
I'm not really comfortable with making non-trivial changes to this
code but here is at least a fix for the PGresult leak (verified to
both apply to 1.2.11 and 2.0.beta4).
-
--- dovecot/src/lib-sql/driver-pgsql.c 15 Mar 2010 18:18:14 - 1.1.1.2
+++ dovecot/src/lib-sql/driver-pgsql.c
On 3/26/2010 4:53 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 26.3.2010, at 10.47, Masaharu Kawada wrote:
How many dovecot-auth processes were there running? Unless there were 1024
dovecot-auth processes, it sounds
more like a file descriptor leak and adding more fds will only delay the error.
On 3/26/2010 10:32 AM, Marco Nenciarini wrote:
Timo Sirainen ha scritto:
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 20:01 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
dovehole - you go inside dovecot via a hole, right?
That is downright pornographic. dovehole - lovehole?
dovenest isn't totally horrible
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Marco Nenciarini wrote:
dovehole - you go inside dovecot via a hole, right?
That is downright pornographic. dovehole - lovehole?
dovenest isn't totally horrible (close), but dovehole is ...
just not
right at all.
dovetail
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:17:26AM -0400, Tony Rutherford wrote:
Well...I'll throw my silly hat into the ring:
doveman
Haha. That sounds like Duffman
Regards
Thomas
Running CentOS 5.x running a postfix/dovecot implementation. Dovecot 1.1.8.
I just ran a full system update in my dev environment, and now I'm
occasionally getting:
Mar 26 07:15:43 example dovecot: auth(default):
worker-server(test...@int.example.com,127.0.0.1): Aborted: Worker
process
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:18:23 +0100 (CET), Steffen Kaiser
skdove...@smail.inf.fh-brs.de articulated:
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Marco Nenciarini wrote:
dovehole - you go inside dovecot via a hole, right?
That is downright pornographic. dovehole - lovehole?
dovenest isn't totally horrible
On 03/26/2010 02:08 PM dove...@corwyn.net wrote:
Running CentOS 5.x running a postfix/dovecot implementation. Dovecot 1.1.8.
I just ran a full system update in my dev environment, and now I'm
occasionally getting:
Mar 26 07:15:43 example dovecot: auth(default):
On 2010-03-26 8:36 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
So my last idea: doveless. It's less of a dovecot process. To me it
seems closer to perfect as anything I've seen so far.
I liked doveauth, but understand why it might be confusing...
Here are some other suggestion...
doveuser
dovein
doveme
On 26.3.2010, at 4.47, Scott Ellis wrote:
But it's not hanging anyway, just eating all CPU? I guess it's calling
some IO_WRITE callback all the time. You could make it do something like:
Yeah, functionally the imap process seems to be just fine. It's just not
being very friendly to the CPU.
On 03/26/2010 05:48 AM Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Timo Sirainen put forth on 3/25/2010 1:30 PM:
…
dovenest (by Pascal Volk) - although reminds me a bit too much of
lovenest :)
…
That is downright pornographic. dovehole - lovehole?
dovenest isn't totally horrible (close), but dovehole is ...
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 11:15 -0400, Tony Rutherford wrote:
Run lsof or something similar to see what open filedescriptors there
are. I ran into this same issue...and it had nothing to do with
Dovecot...Dovecot was just unlucky enough to be requesting to open a
file when the limit was
Leo Unglaub leo.unglaub at gmail.com writes:
Hi Friends,
i have a little problem with my Dovecot installation. The normal
installation works very well and now i have to configurate dovecot that
all member from a domain can access all mailboxes from this domain.
mail_location:
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 16:29 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
==18666== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==18666==at 0x402AFF: message_decoder_decode_next_block
(message-decoder.c:148)
Yeah, looks like there's a bug.
Well, that was a simple fix:
Well, I made this a poll. Please vote. :) http://blog.dovecot.org/
I only added those options that I thought people might have a chance of
understanding what it could possibly mean.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 15:32 +0100, Marco Nenciarini wrote:
Timo Sirainen ha scritto:
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 20:01 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
dovehole - you go inside dovecot via a hole, right?
That is downright pornographic. dovehole - lovehole?
dovenest isn't totally horrible (close),
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 14:00 +, Brian Candler wrote:
However, I've now found the problem using ktrace. The homedir attribute in
LDAP is
/mail/0/6/37/30/brian%dev.example.com/
but when I do 'examine inbox' I see it has been munged:
..
30362 imap NAMI
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 15:50 +0100, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
I'm not really comfortable with making non-trivial changes to this
code but here is at least a fix for the PGresult leak (verified to
both apply to 1.2.11 and 2.0.beta4).
Thanks. I did a slightly different change though:
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 20:04 +0100, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
This is the only part of the driver-pgsql.c code where a
CONNECTION_BAD does not result in driver_pgsql_close being called.
This will likely happen after the next query (from queue or a new one)
failed because the connection was bad. Is
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 22:32 +0100, Oliver Eales wrote:
first of all i am not sure wheter this is a correct behavior according to the
RFC or not...
Problem is, when i set a new custom permanent flag (e.g. testflag) and remove
it afterwards, the flag still stays in the list of the permanent
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 14:12 -0300, Mauro Faccenda wrote:
protocol lda {
..
quota_full_tempfail = no
}
Try removing the above line. I think v1.0 is still stupid enough to not
understand what no means in lda section.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 08:48 +0100, Renaud Allard wrote:
When trying to enable the zlib and imap_zlib plugins, I get the
following error:
imap: dovecot/imap:/opt/dovecot/lib/dovecot/lib2
0_zlib_plugin.so: undefined symbol 'i_stream_create_bz2'
Fixed:
On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 15:35 -0400, Steven King wrote:
I am unable to get 2.0.beta4 to compile. I get the following errors:
/usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-slackware-linux/4.3.3/../../../../lib64/libwrap.a(hosts_access.o):
In function `host_match':
hosts_access.c:(.text+0x625): undefined reference to
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 09:28 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Mar 6 07:06:20 sbh16 postfix/smtpd[30273]: warning: SASL: Connect to
private/auth failed: Resource temporarily unavailable
What about Dovecot's logs? Do you see e.g.:
master: Warning: service(auth): process_limit reached, client
On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 13:04 -0700, Mark Moseley wrote:
Should 'script' respect the first_valid_uid setting in the main config
file?
I think this fixes it also:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/841bfacb7ec3
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 22:47 +, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote:
It's not clear from the configuration when CR/LF conversion happens with
mail_save_crlf set. Does this only happen with appends, or do all mails
handled by Dovecot always get converted when opened?
It happens when saving mails.
On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 14:38 +0100, Leo Unglaub wrote:
2010-03-18 10:03:04 IMAP(unglaub): Error:
mkdir_parents(/var/mails/e-c-o.at/kirchmeir) failed: Permission denied
..
mail_location: maildir:/var/mail/%d/%n
..
location: maildir:/var/mails/e-c-o.at/%%n:INDEX=/tmp/%%n
/var/mail/ vs.
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 14:59 +0100, Jernej Porenta wrote:
I would be happy if IMAP would drop a line about the corrupted mbox... :)
Oh, right, I forgot POP3 actually logs the error while IMAP just tells
client that the mailbox is corrupted. I implemented this now to v2.0:
On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 05:02 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 14:59 +0100, Jernej Porenta wrote:
I would be happy if IMAP would drop a line about the corrupted mbox... :)
Oh, right, I forgot POP3 actually logs the error while IMAP just tells
client that the mailbox is
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 09:28 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Mar 6 07:06:20 sbh16 postfix/smtpd[30273]: warning: SASL: Connect to
private/auth failed: Resource temporarily unavailable
What about Dovecot's logs? Do you see e.g.:
master: Warning: service(auth): process_limit
Timo Sirainen put forth on 3/26/2010 7:36 AM:
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 20:01 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
dovehole - you go inside dovecot via a hole, right?
That is downright pornographic. dovehole - lovehole?
dovenest isn't totally horrible (close), but dovehole is ...
just not
right at
On 27.3.2010, at 6.43, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 09:28 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Mar 6 07:06:20 sbh16 postfix/smtpd[30273]: warning: SASL: Connect to
private/auth failed: Resource temporarily unavailable
Ah, just realized. This should help:
Timo Sirainen put forth on 3/26/2010 5:47 PM:
Well, I made this a poll. Please vote. :) http://blog.dovecot.org/
I only added those options that I thought people might have a chance of
understanding what it could possibly mean.
Add dovel and restart the vote. Short, sweet, to the point,
Noel Butler put forth on 3/26/2010 8:12 PM:
Nice Marco...
OK, Timo, we must have a winner here with dovenull, surely :P
I fear anything with null in it will be confusing to people
not-in-the-know. The average OP may see that process name and think it's a
dovecot trashcan for various
On 27.3.2010, at 6.49, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Tail just doesn't make much sense to me. Also it's not completely free
of pornographic associations either. :)
No, no, totally free of pornographic connotation. Dovetail is a type of
woodworking joint. That's what the vast majority of people on
On 27.3.2010, at 7.01, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Noel Butler put forth on 3/26/2010 8:12 PM:
Nice Marco...
OK, Timo, we must have a winner here with dovenull, surely :P
I fear anything with null in it will be confusing to people
not-in-the-know. The average OP may see that process name and
Hi Timo,
I've just tried to convert my v1.2 configuration to a v2.0
configuration. Below a few obsolete warnings, among others
mail_executable has been replaced by service { executable }, was an
interesting error:
doveconf: Error: duplicate listener: 198:
The broken parts of the converted
56 matches
Mail list logo
