On 1.05.2010 00:32, Timo Sirainen wrote:
v1.2 dbox is similar to v2.0's dbox, but not identical. v2.0 dbox is simpler
and faster. Also dbox and mdbox are different, although they share some code.
http://wiki.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/dbox
Anyway, v2.0 is supposed to be able to read v1.2's db
Hello,
bug or feature?
I'm using Dovecot 1.2.11. And because of a migration projekt I'm tempted
to use the listescape plugin.
If I understood well, it
plugin {
escape_char = "%"
}
should change the escape character to %. But it doesnt. Bug or feature?
But more important:
I have just recently begun learning how to use sieve. For the most
part, it works fine. The problem is that I have created some rather
complicated rules. Occasionally, an e-mail will get sorted
incorrectly and I am not able to easily determine what rule caused it to
occur.
Is there any way or util
On 1.5.2010, at 0.25, luben karavelov wrote:
> My tests and benchmarks were done using v1.2.11. May be I should make some
> benchmarks for mdbox also using dovecot v2. My understanding is that dbox
> is forward compatible with mdbox and there will be no need to convert
> mailboxes from dbox to mdb
On 29.04.2010 21:02, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 15:51 +0300, karavelov wrote:
3. My understanding is that OCFS2 uses a global lock for move/rename.
As you know, Maildir format uses a lot of such operations. I think
that
dbox format (dovecot native) will be better choice, bec
Hello Everyone.
There is possible to rename the email saved by a plugin, like zlib ?
i explain i need to add 1 line in email header, because of that, i want
to rewrite the filename to update the S and W flag.
Tks !
When it notices it, it deletes the dovecot.index.cache file and
disconnects the client (because it can't do anything else). So it's
basically done then. When a new client connection comes, it just doesn't
have a cache (which is fine).
ok
Thanks for your quick support,
Andre
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 17:02 +0200, Andre Hübner wrote:
> >> Oh, looks like I had one such check, but was missing another. Fixed:
> >> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/34c8cdc26dd9
>
> seems to work, but it needs a second connect by client to complete the
> repair?
When it notices it, it del
Oh, looks like I had one such check, but was missing another. Fixed:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/34c8cdc26dd9
seems to work, but it needs a second connect by client to complete the
repair?
Thanks,
Andre
Oh, looks like I had one such check, but was missing another. Fixed:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/34c8cdc26dd9
Thanks.
iam already patching... next time problem occurs i will test new package.
Thanks,
Andre
On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 00:27 +0200, de Lafond Guillaume wrote:
> >> It does not understand the old 1.1 setting "ssl_disable".
> > Yeah, I only added v1.2 settings. But I guess I might as well add
> > older
> > settings too. Added ssl_disable now.
>
>
> login_user, login_process_size, login_proce
On 29.04.2010 21:10, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 14:32 +0300, luben karavelov wrote:
Is there any reason that maildirsize Quota store should not work in dbox
folders or any other folder based mailbox stores?
It's slow at least, because it needs to stat() all files ever
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 16:22 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 14:48 +0200, Andre Hübner wrote:
>
> > IMAP(username): FETCH [HEADER] for mailbox INBOX UID 5106 got too little
> > data (copying): 516 vs 528
> >
> > Until now only Inbox was effected and no other folders. I delete
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 14:48 +0200, Andre Hübner wrote:
> IMAP(username): FETCH [HEADER] for mailbox INBOX UID 5106 got too little
> data (copying): 516 vs 528
>
> Until now only Inbox was effected and no other folders. I delete cachesfiles
> in ~mail/.imap to solve this but is there a way to do
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 09:26 +0200, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> doveadm search INBOX from m...@example.com | while read uid trail; do
>doveadm fetch "$uid"
> done
This works now:
doveadm search from m...@example.com | while read mailbox uid; do
doveadm fetch text mailbox-guid $mailbox uid $uid >
http://el-presidente.edelhost.de/hg/dovecot-1.2/rev/578dcf893777
<<
file istream: If trying to seek backwards in unseekable stream, panic.
The previous way of just setting an error flag was getting ignored too
easily and causing silent corruption in such situations.
>>
hum...
I don't really unders
Also, if it can help, found this in crit.log:
(...) Panic: stream doesn't support seeking backwards
related to same account.
I just found people having same issue, but only for 2.04b version.
ANybody would have more infos ?
On 30/avr - 14:44, Pierre wrote:
>
> Hi list
>
> I recently experience
Hello,
did updates from 1.0.15 to 1.2.11 and is in most cases succesful.
Sometimes dovecot leaves errormessage in Log:
IMAP(username): FETCH [HEADER] for mailbox INBOX UID 5106 got too little
data (copying): 516 vs 528
Until now only Inbox was effected and no other folders. I delete cachesfil
Hi list
I recently experienced core dumps on one of my dovecot
servers:
Apr 30 13:46:49 dovecot: [ID 583609 mail.error] dovecot: child 4088 (imap)
killed with signal 6 (core dumped)
Apr 30 13:46:56 dovecot: [ID 583609 mail.error] IMAP(x...@xx.be): Raw
backtrace: 0x80e42f9 -> 0x80e3df3 -> 0x
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010, Holger Richter wrote:
think it should happen if I don't activate the quota plugin in the lda
section but only in the imap section.
I've the aim that a mail will
never be rejected because the recipient is over his/her quota.
Is it possible to configure dovecot in a manner that only the imap
process respects the quota, and the local delivery ignores completely
the quota? I think it should happen if I don't activate the quota
plugin in the lda section but only in the imap section.
protocol lda {
...
# mail_
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 12:39 +0200, mail...@securitylabs.it wrote:
GCC 2.95, now replaced with 3.04, no more warning.
../../sieve-error.h:30: argument format specified for non-function
`sieve_error_func_t'
I guess this is the error. You could remove
On 30/04/2010 12:41, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 12:39 +0200, mail...@securitylabs.it wrote:
GCC 2.95, now replaced with 3.04, no more warning.
../../sieve-error.h:30: argument format specified for non-function
`sieve_error_func_t'
I guess this is the error
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 12:39 +0200, mail...@securitylabs.it wrote:
> GCC 2.95, now replaced with 3.04, no more warning.
>
> >> ../../sieve-error.h:30: argument format specified for non-function
> >> `sieve_error_func_t'
> >>
> > I guess this is the error. You could remove ATTR_FORMAT(3, 4) fr
On 30/04/2010 12:14, Timo Sirainen wrote:
"The attribute pure is not implemented in GCC versions earlier than
2.96."
How ancient gcc version do you have?
GCC 2.95, now replaced with 3.04, no more warning.
../../sieve-error.h:30: argument format specified for non-function
`sieve_error_f
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 11:33 +0200, mail...@securitylabs.it wrote:
> I'm trying to install Pigeonhole on a old Debian 3.0 but the make
> command fail with:
..
> /usr/local/src/dovecot-1.2.11/src/lib/data-stack.h:73: warning: `pure'
> attribute directive ignored
"The attribute pure is not implemen
On 30/04/2010 09:44, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Refer to http://pigeonhole.dovecot.org for more information. Have fun
testing the new releases and don't hesitate to notify me when there are
problems.
Hi Stephan,
I'm trying to install Pigeonhole on a old Debian 3.0 but the make
command fail with:
On 04/30/2010 10:14 AM Andre Tann wrote:
> Hm, I can't try that by hand, because in fact I only offer POP3s via
> Port 995 to the world:
>
> mail:~# grep -i ^protocols /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
> protocols = pop3s imap imaps
Copy and paste from: http://wiki.dovecot.org/TestPop3Installation
Timo Sirainen, Donnerstag 29 April 2010:
> What about talking POP3 protocol directly?
>
> telnet pop3.server.org 110
> user foo
> pass bar
> uidl
> retr 1
> retr 2
> retr 3
> quit
Hm, I can't try that by hand, because in fact I only offer POP3s via
Port 995 to the world:
mail:~# grep -i ^prot
Hey,
Have you checked Keepalived?
http://www.keepalived.org/
-arto
-Original Message-
From: dovecot-bounces+arto.saraniva=artio@dovecot.org
[mailto:dovecot-bounces+arto.saraniva=artio@dovecot.org] On Behalf Of
Proskurin Kirill
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 10:46 AM
To: dovecot@d
Hello.
I building LB&HA Email cluster based on Exim+Dovecot+LDAP.
Now I thinking what the most right way to LB Dovecot(2 nodes with shared
storage).
HA-Proxy? Dovecot Proxy? Nginx? Else?
--
Best regards,
Proskurin Kirill
Hello Dovecot users,
Pigeonhole development has slowed down significantly in the last few
months due to the fact that I got swamped in work.
The plan is now to move active development of Pigeonhole to Dovecot
v2.0, meaning that this will be the last release for v1.2 that contains
significant
Sure, here they are. Thanks for your interest :)
Sandro
From: Timo Sirainen [...@iki.fi]
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 7:33 PM
To: Sandro Tosi
Cc: Dovecot Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Panic: file mail-index-sync-ext.c: line 212
(sync_ext_reorder):
33 matches
Mail list logo
