Re: [Dovecot] purge maildir folder after sa-learn

2010-05-28 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hi, 2010/5/28 Phil Howard : > So basically, just moving mail files out (to a learn queue or > whatever), from either "new" or "cur" is safe for Dovecot?  That would > be simpler. works like a charm for me. Florian

[Dovecot] doveadm: Error: dlopen(/path/2/lib10_doveadm_expire_plugin.so) failed

2010-05-28 Thread Pascal Volk
Hi Timo, dunno why, but I've executed doveadm with the -D option. Debug output contains: doveadm(root): Error: dlopen(/path/2/lib/dovecot/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_expire_plugin.so) failed: /path/2/lib/dovecot/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_expire_plugin.so: undefined symbol: expire_set_lookup dovecot --v

[Dovecot] Dovecot 1.2.11 driver_mysql_db error

2010-05-28 Thread Thomas M Goerger
Hi, I'm getting an error trying to make 1.2.11 with mysql drivers on. The output that I'm getting is: Undefined first referenced symbol in file driver_mysql_db ../lib-sql/libsql.a(sql-drivers-register.o) ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No

Re: [Dovecot] recipient_delimiter

2010-05-28 Thread Jerry
On Fri, 28 May 2010 16:26:53 -0400 Charles Marcus articulated: > This in fact makes customizing settings easy (at least for me). I just > put all of my settings at the end of the file, so I know that those > will be the ones used regardless of what is specified above. That is exactly how I do m

Re: [Dovecot] recipient_delimiter

2010-05-28 Thread Charles Marcus
On 2010-05-28 5:01 PM, Phil Howard wrote: > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 16:53, Charles Marcus wrote: >> The whole purpose of the -n output is to provide clean, easy to read >> *settings* as seen by postfix (as opposed to comments that are meant for >> people). > So you are saying that this is not mean

Re: [Dovecot] recipient_delimiter

2010-05-28 Thread Phil Howard
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 16:53, Charles Marcus wrote: > On 2010-05-28 4:49 PM, Phil Howard wrote: >> If postconf -n carried comments along, then it could be used as a >> config linter ... let it's output replace the original and that will >> be the one to edit for the next change. > > The whole pur

Re: [Dovecot] 1.2.11, mbox, new mail

2010-05-28 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Timo Sirainen put forth on 5/28/2010 10:55 AM: > On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 20:14 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: >> What, if anything, am I sacrificing, or what new problems might I cause, by >> using mbox_very_dirty_syncs=yes?Previously I was using mbox_dirty_syncs >> = yes. > > If non-Dovecot MUAs

Re: [Dovecot] recipient_delimiter

2010-05-28 Thread Charles Marcus
On 2010-05-28 4:49 PM, Phil Howard wrote: > If postconf -n carried comments along, then it could be used as a > config linter ... let it's output replace the original and that will > be the one to edit for the next change. The whole purpose of the -n output is to provide clean, easy to read *setti

Re: [Dovecot] recipient_delimiter

2010-05-28 Thread Phil Howard
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 15:28, Jerry wrote: > Exactly what type of system are you trying to support? I fail to > understand why you are constantly changing the base Postfix > configuration. I add/delete users on a virtually daily basis, however, > once my basic Postifx configuration was setup, I

Re: [Dovecot] recipient_delimiter

2010-05-28 Thread Charles Marcus
On 2010-05-28 2:18 PM, Phil Howard wrote: > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 14:06, Charles Marcus wrote: >> On 2010-05-28 1:00 PM, Phil Howard wrote: >>> Have you seen any config check tools? >> Yes - it's called a brain. ;) > I think you are missing the point. Not... > A config check tool would be sif

Re: [Dovecot] recipient_delimiter

2010-05-28 Thread Jerry
On Fri, 28 May 2010 14:18:06 -0400 Phil Howard articulated: > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 14:06, Charles Marcus > wrote: > > On 2010-05-28 1:00 PM, Phil Howard wrote: > >>> If the problem is protocol related (connections time out, or an > >>> SMTP server complains about syntax errors etc.) consider

Re: [Dovecot] recipient_delimiter

2010-05-28 Thread Phil Howard
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 14:06, Charles Marcus wrote: > On 2010-05-28 1:00 PM, Phil Howard wrote: >>> If the problem is protocol related (connections time out, or an SMTP >>> server complains about syntax errors etc.) consider recording a session >>> with tcpdump, as described in the DEBUG_README d

Re: [Dovecot] purge maildir folder after sa-learn

2010-05-28 Thread Phil Howard
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 06:13, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 09:56 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote: >> > rm -f /path/to/Maildir/.spam-learn/* > > Oh, I really ment .spam-learn/cur/* (and maybe .spam-learn/new/* if you > make it learn from both and it doesn't move mails to cur/). >

Re: [Dovecot] recipient_delimiter

2010-05-28 Thread Charles Marcus
On 2010-05-28 1:00 PM, Phil Howard wrote: >> If the problem is protocol related (connections time out, or an SMTP >> server complains about syntax errors etc.) consider recording a session >> with tcpdump, as described in the DEBUG_README document. > Have you seen any config check tools? Yes - it

Re: [Dovecot] recipient_delimiter

2010-05-28 Thread Charles Marcus
On 2010-05-28 11:25 AM, Phil Howard wrote: > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 09:55, Charles Marcus wrote: >> On 2010-05-27 1:42 PM, Phil Howard wrote: >>> Yup, there was a 2nd setting nearly at the bottom of the file, and >>> it was different. Thanks for catching that. >> This is why you *always* go by wh

Re: [Dovecot] recipient_delimiter

2010-05-28 Thread Phil Howard
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 12:11, Jerry wrote: > On Fri, 28 May 2010 11:25:17 -0400 > Phil Howard articulated: > > >> My main.cf file has the comments (my own that explains why settings >> are there, not the default comments).  It is the easier to read file. >> Even then, I was also reading the post

Re: [Dovecot] recipient_delimiter

2010-05-28 Thread Jerry
On Fri, 28 May 2010 11:25:17 -0400 Phil Howard articulated: > My main.cf file has the comments (my own that explains why settings > are there, not the default comments). It is the easier to read file. > Even then, I was also reading the postconf -n output and just didn't > see the subtle differ

Re: [Dovecot] cur folder e-mails are not shown...

2010-05-28 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 12:55 +0200, Gonzalo Aguilar Delgado wrote: > I realized that I have only e-mails from last 13 days. I see that I have > lots more in the cur folder inside my Maildir folder. > > The problem is that I cannot see them. > What can be the problem? Since you didn't claim you ac

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot and Apples Mail.app

2010-05-28 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 10:17 +0200, Gerhard Waldemair wrote: > Now I have the problem, that I get mail under Mail.app double. (same > header, Message-ID ,...) > > When I use Thudnerbird under MacOS there is all OK. That doesn't make any sense. Only thing I can think of is that you created two id

Re: [Dovecot] 1.2.11, mbox, new mail

2010-05-28 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 20:14 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > What, if anything, am I sacrificing, or what new problems might I cause, by > using mbox_very_dirty_syncs=yes?Previously I was using mbox_dirty_syncs = > yes. If non-Dovecot MUAs modify mbox simultaneously (except appends by MDA are ok

Re: [Dovecot] question about rpc quota reporting 1.2.11

2010-05-28 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 09:10 -0700, Tom Lieuallen wrote: > I'm getting the same type of error with the quota2 line now: >open(/nfs/rack/u4/quotas) failed: Permission denied > > Since the home directory quota worked without the plugin configuration, > my guess is that the plugin config is not u

Re: [Dovecot] cur folder e-mails are not shown...

2010-05-28 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 12:55 +0200, Gonzalo Aguilar Delgado wrote: > I realized that I have only e-mails from last 13 days. I see that I have > lots more in the cur folder inside my Maildir folder. Check how many messages you have by talking IMAP protocol directly: http://wiki.dovecot.org/TestIns

Re: [Dovecot] recipient_delimiter

2010-05-28 Thread Phil Howard
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 09:55, Charles Marcus wrote: > On 2010-05-27 1:42 PM, Phil Howard wrote: >> Yup, there was a 2nd setting nearly at the bottom of the file, and >> it was different. Thanks for catching that. > > This is why you *always* go by what output pof postconf -n says, not > what you

Re: [Dovecot] Auto Block!

2010-05-28 Thread Henrique Fernandes
I had seen this before! But i thought would be better if dovecot had it built in! But Thansk anyway! []'sf.rique On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Mario Antonio wrote: > On 5/28/2010 10:20 AM, Tom Hendrikx wrote: > >> On 28/05/10 16:14, Henrique Fernandes wrote: >> >> >>> There is an plugin th

Re: [Dovecot] Auto Block!

2010-05-28 Thread Mario Antonio
On 5/28/2010 10:20 AM, Tom Hendrikx wrote: On 28/05/10 16:14, Henrique Fernandes wrote: There is an plugin that makes dovecot lock an imap/pop/smtpauth if the user miss passowrd more than N times ? I would like to avoid brute force! Thanks []'sf.rique Hi, Take a look at fail2ban

Re: [Dovecot] Auto Block!

2010-05-28 Thread Tom Hendrikx
On 28/05/10 16:14, Henrique Fernandes wrote: > There is an plugin that makes dovecot lock an imap/pop/smtpauth if the user > miss passowrd more than N times ? > > I would like to avoid brute force! > > Thanks > > []'sf.rique > Hi, Take a look at fail2ban + iptables. Regards, Tom

[Dovecot] Auto Block!

2010-05-28 Thread Henrique Fernandes
There is an plugin that makes dovecot lock an imap/pop/smtpauth if the user miss passowrd more than N times ? I would like to avoid brute force! Thanks []'sf.rique

Re: [Dovecot] recipient_delimiter

2010-05-28 Thread Charles Marcus
On 2010-05-27 1:42 PM, Phil Howard wrote: > Yup, there was a 2nd setting nearly at the bottom of the file, and > it was different. Thanks for catching that. This is why you *always* go by what output pof postconf -n says, not what you think you put in main.cf. You wasted a lot of time (yours and

Re: [Dovecot] Problems with Outlook clients after a migration

2010-05-28 Thread Joseba Torre
Some new data: If I remember correctly, I've changed: - commented out the outlook-idle workaround. - the server's iptables now doesn't use state in 993 port and the situation is much better. I've got some "Disconnected in IDLE" messages, but must of them where related to changes in the client (t

Re: [Dovecot] delete messages after sa-learn

2010-05-28 Thread Andrzej Adam Filip
Florian Effenberger wrote: > Hi Andrzej, > > 2010/5/28 Andrzej Adam Filip : > >> Have you considered fetching from dovecot (maildir) to mbox file and >> learning from mbox file? >> a) fetchmail CAN use .../dovecot/imap wrapper script in "plugin" option >>   to read maildir directly  [set environme

[Dovecot] cur folder e-mails are not shown...

2010-05-28 Thread Gonzalo Aguilar Delgado
Hi All! I realized that I have only e-mails from last 13 days. I see that I have lots more in the cur folder inside my Maildir folder. The problem is that I cannot see them. Permissions seems to be right: drwx-- 2 gaguilar gaguilar 1081344 2010-05-28 12:53 cur -rw--- 1 gaguilar gaguilar

Re: [Dovecot] delete messages after sa-learn

2010-05-28 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hi Andrzej, 2010/5/28 Andrzej Adam Filip : > Have you considered fetching from dovecot (maildir) to mbox file and > learning from mbox file? > a) fetchmail CAN use .../dovecot/imap wrapper script in "plugin" option >   to read maildir directly  [set environment variable MAIL to >   maildir:~/Mail

Re: [Dovecot] Over quota

2010-05-28 Thread Joseba Torre
On Jueves 27 Mayo 2010 18:30:41 James Devine escribió: > Is there any way to still be able to login/delete email via > dovecot-imap when the user's filesystem quota is exceeded? We just > moved from courier where this was still possible but now a user over > quota can login but cannot get a list o

Re: [Dovecot] delete messages after sa-learn

2010-05-28 Thread Andrzej Adam Filip
Florian Effenberger wrote: > I am looking for a command-line utility to automatically purge one > Maildir folder. I want to periodically run sa-learn from cron, and > after the spam learning folder has been added to the Bayes database, > its contents should be deleted. I've searched a bit, but onl