On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 06:03:27PM +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > Recompiling leads to the same result. Rolling back to Dovecot v2.0.beta5
> > (6f5d3e035652) restores functionality.
>
> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/6d32cf98b5f3 should fix this.
>
Looks good now. Thanks.
Hi All,
I've pored over the wiki, read through the archive, and have what I believe
should be a working set-up, but I can't seem to get my shared namespace to work
correctly. Any guidance would be much appreciated.
I started off using a flat file for acl_shared_dict and ran into the same
pro
When my dovecot-2.0.beta5 auth module logs a 552-byte debug message, the
message is split into two lines and also a null error message:
Wed Jun 9 23:44:29 gromit dovecot[58892]: auth: Error:
I think this has to do with the use of PIPE_BUF (512) sized buffers in the
logging code, and the !line_
On 5/28/10 8:53 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 09:10 -0700, Tom Lieuallen wrote:
I'm getting the same type of error with the quota2 line now:
open(/nfs/rack/u4/quotas) failed: Permission denied
Since the home directory quota worked without the plugin configuration,
my gues
On 10.6.2010, at 1.16, Tom Lieuallen wrote:
> I'm having real difficulty with the acl_shared_dict configuration. I'd
> prefer to just use a flat file, as I don't anticipate using shared folders
> very frequently. I don't need a database and would greatly prefer not to
> have a dependency on o
I'm also having beginner's troubles with shared mailboxes with dovecot
1.2.11.
I've used the TestInstallation instructions for connecting to the imap
port via openssl and issuing the setacl/getacl commands. Those appear
to be fine.
I'm having real difficulty with the acl_shared_dict configu
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 08:28 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 21:48 +0200, Johannes Dröge wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am having this error message on some rare emails with more than 6 mb
> > or so. Neither the dovecot server nor the filesystem where the maildir
> > resides ha
On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 21:48 +0200, Johannes Dröge wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am having this error message on some rare emails with more than 6 mb
> or so. Neither the dovecot server nor the filesystem where the maildir
> resides have any quota or are full at the time of delivering.
>
> The mails go
On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 16:10 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2010-06-09 2:02 PM, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
> > Recalling now, I think this issue triggered me to ditch Evolution after
> > 2 days of testing some years ago, and into using the same client
> > everywhere. But YMMV...
>
> Everything I've re
On 2010-06-09 3:48 PM, Johannes Dröge wrote:
> message:
> *sieve: info: started log at ...
> error: msgid=: failed to store into mailbox 'INBOX': Not enough
> disk space.
postconf -n output?
On 2010-06-09 2:02 PM, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
> Recalling now, I think this issue triggered me to ditch Evolution after
> 2 days of testing some years ago, and into using the same client
> everywhere. But YMMV...
Everything I've read says Evolution is not nearly stable enough for
serious, daily use,
Hello,
I am having this error message on some rare emails with more than 6 mb
or so. Neither the dovecot server nor the filesystem where the maildir
resides have any quota or are full at the time of delivering.
The mails goes getmail->postfix->dovecot delivery agent
Is the mail written to an
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 14:02, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
> Flags was actually the wrong phrase, the correct term is IMAP keywords.
> The way that Dovecot handles this internally, is described in
> http://wiki.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/Maildir .
>
> But it has no use to investigate the inner workings of
On 09/06/10 19:12, Phil Howard wrote:
> But that would mean there is some mechanism in IMAP for these flags.
> Dovecot is attaching the flag 'T'. But what does 'T' mean? If IMAP
> allows setting flags with arbitrary letters, then 'T' could mean Trash
> for one client and Terrorist for another cl
On ke, 2010-06-09 at 18:58 +0200, Thomas Hummel wrote:
> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 07:04:13PM +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 15:31 +0200, Thomas Hummel wrote:
> >
> > > I've noticed that Thunderbird (3.0.3) seems to wrongly "repeat" the
> > > namespace
> > > prefix when selec
On ke, 2010-06-09 at 17:41 +0100, Keith Edmunds wrote:
> I'm setting up shared mailboxes as in
> http://wiki.dovecot.org/SharedMailboxes/Shared, and have set ACLs as
> described on that page to share one folder of user A's mailbox with User B.
You did it with SETACL command, and you had acl_shared
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 12:07, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
> The IMAP protocol does not define folder names and such. Servers and
> clients only know how to create/remove/rename/relocate folders and
> files, and some other basics. The names that are used by default, is a
> choice of the user (mostly the d
On ke, 2010-06-09 at 15:26 +1200, Tim Uckun wrote:
> >
> > You didn't really seem to have any specific questions.
>
> Sorry. I'll try to be more specific.
>
> My first question is what do to about the mail format. Right now it's
> mbox and from reading the migration I understand that having dovec
Tim Uckun wrote:
> >> I hate to be rude but I am going to bump my post. Does anybody have
> >> any advice on migrating from vm-pop3d?
> >
> > Which version of vm-pop3d you use ?
> >
> vm-pop3d POP3 Server Version 1.1.7f-DA-2
Ughh... Full name of this big mess - 1.1.7f-T8-DA-2 (direct admin versio
On ti, 2010-06-08 at 22:05 +0200, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
> Am 08.06.2010 um 21:57 schrieb Timo Sirainen:
>
> > On ti, 2010-06-08 at 19:36 +0200, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
> >> #0 quota_mailbox_transaction_commit (ctx=0x1d0,
> >> changes_r=0x7fffec59fd80) at quota-storage.c:91
> >>qbox = (
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 07:04:13PM +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 15:31 +0200, Thomas Hummel wrote:
>
> > I've noticed that Thunderbird (3.0.3) seems to wrongly "repeat" the
> > namespace
> > prefix when selecting the top level maildir of a namesapce.
> >
> > hidden = no
>
I'm setting up shared mailboxes as in
http://wiki.dovecot.org/SharedMailboxes/Shared, and have set ACLs as
described on that page to share one folder of user A's mailbox with User B.
However, I'm struggling to get Thunderbird for us...@example.com to read
the shared folder of us...@example.com. Ha
On 09/06/10 16:15, Phil Howard wrote:
> I'm trying both Evolution and Thunderbird on my IMAP server, and find
> that there are differences in how some things are done, between
> clients. Shouldn't there have been a standard way to do these things
> in the IMAP protocol? The first thing I noticed
I'm trying both Evolution and Thunderbird on my IMAP server, and find
that there are differences in how some things are done, between
clients. Shouldn't there have been a standard way to do these things
in the IMAP protocol? The first thing I noticed is that when deleting
email from one client, i
Am 07.06.2010 18:23, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
> On ma, 2010-06-07 at 11:00 +0200, Martin Ott wrote:
>
>> we've defined a public namespace "shared" and use the acl and lazy-expunge
>> plugins among others. The problem is, that a mailbox is deleted by the
>> DELETE-command without the x-flag to be set
>> I hate to be rude but I am going to bump my post. Does anybody have
>> any advice on migrating from vm-pop3d?
>
> Which version of vm-pop3d you use ?
>
vm-pop3d POP3 Server Version 1.1.7f-DA-2
26 matches
Mail list logo
