On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 06:03:27PM +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Recompiling leads to the same result. Rolling back to Dovecot v2.0.beta5
(6f5d3e035652) restores functionality.
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/6d32cf98b5f3 should fix this.
Looks good now. Thanks.
On 09/06/2010 18:12, Phil Howard wrote:
But that would mean there is some mechanism in IMAP for these flags.
Dovecot is attaching the flag 'T'. But what does 'T' mean? If IMAP
allows setting flags with arbitrary letters, then 'T' could mean Trash
for one client and Terrorist for another client,
Hi people,
first message to this list.
I've a problem with dovecot 1.0.15 (debian latest package) and an LDAP query.
The situation is the following. My LDAP users have multiple mail addresses
(field 'mail') and mail should be able to be sent to any of these and the mail
should always end on
On ke, 2010-06-09 at 17:41 +0100, Keith Edmunds wrote:
I'm setting up shared mailboxes as in
http://wiki.dovecot.org/SharedMailboxes/Shared, and have set ACLs as
described on that page to share one folder of user A's mailbox with
User B.
You did it with SETACL command, and you had
On 2010-06-09 6:24 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 16:10 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
Everything I've read says Evolution is not nearly stable enough for
serious, daily use, even on Linux...
I disagree, I have used Evolution on desktop, seriously, at
home and work, for many many
On 2010-06-09 6:40 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
I missed your using system accounts so Charles may be on the right
track, you need to find the size of your existing mailbox,
search for mailbox_size_limit if you have not altered this value in
main.cf use postconf -d to see its value, about 50MB I
On 2010-06-10 3:31 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
BTW, anyone who has a 44MB INBOX should be slapped repeatedly about the
cranium and then educated about POP and IMAP, and how each should be used.
So, Stan, how much will you charge to come do the honors for me?
It will probably be in the
Am 10.06.2010 17:19, schrieb Charles Marcus:
On 2010-06-10 3:31 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
BTW, anyone who has a 44MB INBOX should be slapped repeatedly about the
cranium and then educated about POP and IMAP, and how each should be used.
So, Stan, how much will you charge to come do
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 06:17:49PM +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On ke, 2010-06-09 at 18:58 +0200, Thomas Hummel wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 07:04:13PM +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 15:31 +0200, Thomas Hummel wrote:
I've noticed that Thunderbird (3.0.3) seems to
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:54, Jakob Curdes j...@info-systems.de wrote:
Am 10.06.2010 17:19, schrieb Charles Marcus:
On 2010-06-10 3:31 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
BTW, anyone who has a 44MB INBOX should be slapped repeatedly about the
cranium and then educated about POP and IMAP, and how
On 11:59 AM, Jerrale Gayle wrote:
I have fail2ban working for EVERYTHING else except dovecot. I have tried
using my own custom regex in conjunction with the regex on the
dovecot.org site. Neither are picked up by fail2ban and I'm trying to
use an imminent attack agaist dovecot, going on now,
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:38 PM, fakessh fake...@fakessh.eu wrote:
hi dovecot network
the principle of fail2ban is repeated for connections with the same login
fail2ban does not work if the attack changes to login every time
this type of attack is rather to find valid user accounts
I may
hi dovecot network
the principle of fail2ban is repeated for connections with the same login
fail2ban does not work if the attack changes to login every time
this type of attack is rather to find valid user accounts
I may be wrong, I hope I too am a victim of this kind of attacks
On Thu, 10
I have fail2ban working for EVERYTHING else except dovecot. I have tried
using my own custom regex in conjunction with the regex on the
dovecot.org site. Neither are picked up by fail2ban and I'm trying to
use an imminent attack agaist dovecot, going on now, to my advantage to
see when I get
acl_shared_dict = file:/private/dovecot/var/etc/shared-mailboxes
The '../var/etc' directory is something like 755. I have to create
the file first and make it 666.
That should work.
When it is updated, ownership permissions are changed such that
the user giving acl permissions then owns
Charles Marcus put forth on 6/10/2010 10:19 AM:
On 2010-06-10 3:31 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
BTW, anyone who has a 44MB INBOX should be slapped repeatedly about the
cranium and then educated about POP and IMAP, and how each should be used.
So, Stan, how much will you charge to come do the
Jakob Curdes put forth on 6/10/2010 10:54 AM:
Same here, we run a mailbox_size_limit of 700MB and have several users
regularly hitting the limit.
Can't really slap them as they would reply on google I have 7 GB mail
space.
I wonder how often Google does full disaster recovery off site
Yeah, you're wrong. With regexp, you can have fail2ban ignore any part of the
log
file, as in ANYTHING containing text around anything will be caught. You
can have fail2ban ban every ip address that shows up in the log!
On 6/10/2010 5:38 PM, fakessh wrote:
hi dovecot network
the principle
My regex to fail2ban for dovecot 2.0beta5 in user in sql base work like
this!
failregex = dovecot: auth: sql.*,HOST.*: Password mismatch
dovecot: auth: sql.*,HOST.*: unknown user
And if you use smtp-auth in postfix truth dovecot here it is my regex for it
failregex =
19 matches
Mail list logo
