Hi,
On 2010-06-25 03:51 UTC Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Angelo Chen put forth on 6/24/2010 10:25 PM:
I think that's one option, but it's around 10G data for the last few
years, and more than 100 folders under outlook express, do you think
that will be fast enough by using Outlook Express copying
Hi,
Nice approach, but the it's Thunderbird, what I have is outlook Express.
Angelo
On Jun 25, 2010, at 2:02 PM, Patrick Nagel wrote:
Hi,
On 2010-06-25 03:51 UTC Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Angelo Chen put forth on 6/24/2010 10:25 PM:
I think that's one option, but it's around 10G data for the
Am Donnerstag, den 24.06.2010, 22:30 -0500 schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
Does running imapproxy in this scenario yield any benefit, given there
is no network traffic involved?
it does. IMAPPRoxy caches for example all directories. If the user open
a folder, then you have a new connection to the IMAP
Patrick Nagel put forth on 6/25/2010 1:02 AM:
Hi,
On 2010-06-25 03:51 UTC Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Angelo Chen put forth on 6/24/2010 10:25 PM:
I think that's one option, but it's around 10G data for the last few
years, and more than 100 folders under outlook express, do you think
that will be
Angelo Chen put forth on 6/25/2010 1:32 AM:
Hi,
Nice approach, but the it's Thunderbird, what I have is outlook Express.
The process is the same. Outlook Express can do this also. Have you ever
used OE with an IMAP connection? Do you need instructions on setting up an
IMAP connection?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Denny Schierz wrote:
it does. IMAPPRoxy caches for example all directories. If the user open
a folder, then you have a new connection to the IMAP server, that can
take a while (auth ...). After a few seconds the connection is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Angelo Chen put forth on 6/25/2010 1:32 AM:
Hi,
Nice approach, but the it's Thunderbird, what I have is outlook Express.
The process is the same. Outlook Express can do this also. Have you ever
used
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Patrick Nagel wrote:
I tried something similar (with Thunderbird) once, and it caused a lot of
trouble. We only had around 1.3 GB, IIRC, but thousands of folders. Here is a
I cannot back it, I used TB v1.5 on Linux, where you
Hi all, my first post.
After years with an old server, a couple of months ago I've installed a
new one.
We use IMAP. After research, I chosed dovecot.
It has been running for several weeks but from one week ago or so, it
suddently dies about once per day.
The only change done in the
I had the same problem due to clock backward
On 06/25/2010 09:53 AM, Xavi Montero wrote:
Hi all, my first post.
After years with an old server, a couple of months ago I've installed a
new one.
We use IMAP. After research, I chosed dovecot.
It has been running for several weeks but from one
Xavi Montero wrote:
It has been running for several weeks but from one week ago or so, it
suddently dies about once per day.
The only change done in the server one week ago has been to install
ntpdate, running once per day in cron-daily.
In the cron reports, ntpdate reports a time-jump of 9
On 25.6.2010 10:53, Xavi Montero wrote:
The only change done in the server one week ago has been to install
ntpdate, running once per day in cron-daily.
In the cron reports, ntpdate reports a time-jump of 9 seconds each
Time jumps, especially backwards, are not a good thing on a server. You
On 25.6.2010, at 8.04, Denny Schierz wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 24.06.2010, 22:30 -0500 schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
Does running imapproxy in this scenario yield any benefit, given there
is no network traffic involved?
it does. IMAPPRoxy caches for example all directories. If the user open
a
Hello
Some users had occasionally a problem with Thunderbird , some random
emails with attachement(s) cannot be read anymore
the email appears empty and TB seems to enter in an infinite loop
saying it is downloading the message
The only solution I found was :
1 - stop thunderbird on the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Some users had occasionally a problem with Thunderbird , some random emails
with attachement(s) cannot be read anymore
Yep.
the email appears empty
that one, too
and TB seems to enter in an infinite
On 25/06/2010 13:46, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Most people seem to be saying imapproxy helps a lot, because they
noticed it helped so much with Courier/UW-IMAP..
Agree.
On 2010-06-24 9:18 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
But with auth cache enabled, there is no extra database load. The
index files are also most likely in OS's cache (assuming local disk),
so no extra disk I/O to read them either. I'm sure it's a bit more
extra CPU usage, but I'm not all that certain
On 2010-06-25 3:19 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
It's interesting that you weren't able/willing to track down the
source of the problem. It's also interesting how you mention single
drag and drop. In my experience, you can't drag/drop _folders_ in
Thunderbird at all. All the migrations I've done
On 2010-06-25 2:02 AM, Patrick Nagel wrote:
I tried something similar (with Thunderbird) once, and it caused a lot of
trouble. We only had around 1.3 GB, IIRC, but thousands of folders.
3.1 is *much* better now...
Now to figure out if there is a way to do this for an entire account -
Inbox,
On 2010-06-25 7:48 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Some users had occasionally a problem with Thunderbird , some random
emails with attachement(s) cannot be read anymore
the email appears empty and TB seems to enter in an infinite loop
saying it is downloading the message
The only solution I found
Thanks for your *complete* answer Charles .
On 06/25/2010 02:32 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-06-25 7:48 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Some users had occasionally a problem with Thunderbird , some random
emails with attachement(s) cannot be read anymore
the email appears empty and TB seems to
On Friday 25 June 2010 wrote Charles Marcus:
On 2010-06-24 9:18 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
But with auth cache enabled, there is no extra database load. The
index files are also most likely in OS's cache (assuming local disk),
so no extra disk I/O to read them either. I'm sure it's a bit more
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 14:44 +0200, Amon Ott wrote:
For whatever it is worth, we use imapproxy, because it allows us to use
one-time passwords for webmail users. One login, not many.
With large enough auth cache, I think that should also work with Dovecot
directly (although if the session
It's interesting that you weren't able/willing to track down the
source of the problem. It's also interesting how you mention single
drag and drop. In my experience, you can't drag/drop _folders_ in
Thunderbird at all. All the migrations I've done this way required
I migrated to my new server
hi,
possible to setup a imap server without smtp? just want to store some old
emails.
Angelo
On 2010-06-25 9:58 AM, Angelo Chen wrote:
possible to setup a imap server without smtp? just want to store some old
emails.
Of course, one has nothing to do with the other.
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 6/25/2010 10:05 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-06-25 9:58 AM, Angelo Chen wrote:
possible to setup a imap server without smtp? just want to store some old
emails.
Of course, one has nothing to do with the other.
A lot of trouble, more than just importing them into your
Hi Stan,
On 2010-06-25 07:19 UTC Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Patrick Nagel put forth on 6/25/2010 1:02 AM:
On 2010-06-25 03:51 UTC Stan Hoeppner wrote:
[...]
The first method is a single step process and is reliable.
I tried something similar (with Thunderbird) once, and it caused a lot of
I was going to ask how much space I should allocate for auth_cache_size
- but decided to read the wiki first. Now I'll be more specific -
Wiki says about 50 bytes per passdb, and up to 200 bytes for userdb - so
my arithmetic says each combined entry needs 250 bytes budgeted.
Assuming
On 2010-06-25 10:27 AM, Patrick Nagel wrote:
I don't know when you tried it, but with the version I used at the time
(2.0.0.17? .18?), it was possible to copy one folder at a time from one
account to another, by drag drop. 99% of the folders were inside one top
level folder, which I
Quoting Eric Rostetter rostet...@mail.utexas.edu:
Quoting Daniel L. Miller dmil...@amfes.com:
I know when I was playing web clients - particularly squirrelmail -
there was a definite perceived improvement - but I never measured it.
Webmail clients are basically stateless. Over time, they
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 08:09 -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Let's start small. Assume ten users, all connected - and everybody also
likes looking at everybody else's mailbox. So there are ten clients,
each with at least ten connections (I say at least because each folder
viewed within an
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 18:57 +0200, Thomas Hummel wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 04:40:35PM +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Hello Timo,
doveconf: Fatal: Error in configuration file
/usr/local/dovecot-1.2.12/etc/dovecot.conf line 176: Unknown setting:
process_limit
This was
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 17:27 -0300, Alex Baule wrote:
Hello everyone.
I Need to know when a email is expunge, but i don't need change this action.
I Need to call another action + the default action.
There is a plugin to do this ?
In v2.0 there is a notify plugin which you can pretty
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 16:43 -0300, Alex Baule wrote:
if (imail-data.stream != NULL ||
(_mail-uid == 0 zuser-save_handler == NULL)) {
return zmail-super.get_stream(_mail, hdr_size, body_size,
stream_r);
}
I think this is the line that return
Hi all,
ok, I am running version v2.0.beta6 and the latest pigeonhole build to
run managesieve and the sieve delivery filters...
I am getting the following response from the managesieve port when
connecting :
Escape character is '^]'.
IMPLEMENTATION Dovecot
SIEVE
SASL PLAIN
STARTTLS
VERSION
Rajesh M wrote:
Rajesh M wrote:
Rajesh M wrote:
eric
i studied LDA a bit
if i use lda that means all my 5000+ users' email index files will be
continuously updated when every email arrives -- means a lot of writes
to
disk ... is that correct ?
Yes, but I think you make it sound worse
Tim Traver wrote:
Hi all,
ok, I am running version v2.0.beta6 and the latest pigeonhole build to
run managesieve and the sieve delivery filters...
I am getting the following response from the managesieve port when
connecting :
snip
Am I missing something?
A little.
what might cause it
On 6/25/2010 3:26 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Basically, one of the top items on our TODO list. Changes to the
Dovecot service configuration in Dovecot v2.0 broke the ability to
dynamically obtain the ManageSieve capabilities before the user has
logged in. We are close to fixing this, but until
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 13:49 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 14:44 +0200, Amon Ott wrote:
For whatever it is worth, we use imapproxy, because it allows us to use
one-time passwords for webmail users. One login, not many.
With large enough auth cache, I think that
On 26.6.2010, at 0.57, Noel Butler wrote:
As I mentioned earlier It doesnt with squirrelmail, I tried it on
production and the I/O increased a bit, watching logging alone was
giving me a
headache (no, not in debug mode either)..
How much is a bit that the I/O increased? Less than 10%?
So
apologies, I sent this direct to Eric not the list ore OP, my bad :)
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 13:46 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote:
snipped 7 pages of irrelevant un-trimmed crap
now i would also need to edit the dovecot.conf file
could you guide me on what changes do i need to dovecot.conf
On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 01:02 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 26.6.2010, at 0.57, Noel Butler wrote:
As I mentioned earlier It doesnt with squirrelmail, I tried it on
production and the I/O increased a bit, watching logging alone was
giving me a
headache (no, not in debug mode either)..
Timo,
On 6/24/10 4:23 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
I'd recommend also installing and configuring imapproxy - it can be
beneficial with squirrelmail.
Do you have any about a real world numbers about installation with and without
imapproxy?
We run imapproxy behind our Roundcube
On 26.6.2010, at 3.08, Brandon Davidson wrote:
We run a proxy instance on each of the webmail hosts, with the communication
between the web application add the proxy being done in cleartext, but with
the proxy - Dovecot communication secured over SSL. Besides preventing a
lot of extra SSL
Steffen Kaiser put forth on 6/25/2010 7:01 AM:
2) thunderbird opened too many simultaneous connections to the server. I
do not remember where they would blocked or terminated, but in some
cases thunderbird did not seem to detect this failure
This is a pet peeve of mine. Recent TB revs
Charles Marcus put forth on 6/25/2010 7:25 AM:
On 2010-06-25 3:19 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
It's interesting that you weren't able/willing to track down the
source of the problem. It's also interesting how you mention single
drag and drop. In my experience, you can't drag/drop _folders_ in
Patrick Nagel put forth on 6/25/2010 9:27 AM:
Hi Stan,
On 2010-06-25 07:19 UTC Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Patrick Nagel put forth on 6/25/2010 1:02 AM:
On 2010-06-25 03:51 UTC Stan Hoeppner wrote:
[...]
The first method is a single step process and is reliable.
I tried something similar (with
hi, i just tried 3.x, it looks like i can't drag and drop sub folders, and one
problem is, imap folders are on top, and local folders(imported from outlook)
are below, and it has more than 300, drag and drop toward imap folders on top
is very difficult.
On Jun 26, 2010, at 11:24 AM, Stan
49 matches
Mail list logo
