I've got a couple more issues with the doveadm director interface:
1) If I use doveadm director remove to disable a host with active users,
the director seems to lose track of users mapped to that host. I guess I
would expect it to tear down any active sessions by killing the login
proxies, like
On 7/13/10 4:53 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
Hmm. Between? Is it doing CAPABILITY before or after login or both? That
anyway sounds different from the idle timeout problem..
I added some additional logging to imapproxy and it looks like it's actually
getting stuck in a few
Hi
I just configure dovecot with the second dictionary for the domain quota
dict {
quotadict = mysql:/usr/local/etc/dovecot-quota.conf
quota_domain = mysql:/usr/local/etc/dovecot-quota-domain.conf
}
plugin {
quota = dict:user::proxy::quotadict
quota2 =
On 14.7.2010, at 9.55, Brandon Davidson wrote:
If I attach to the stuck imap-login process, it's waiting in:
#0 0x00385c0c6070 in __write_nocancel () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1 0x003c5620c9a1 in login_proxy_state_notify () from
/usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot-login.so.0
Oh,
Your mailbox has exceeded the storage limit which is 20GB as set by your
administrator,you are currently running on
20.9GB,you may not be able to send or receive new mail untilyou re-validate
your mailbox. To re-validate your mailbox, please
click the link below:
Hello,
I just tried to compile like I always do (using BSD make) and got:
Using $ in a non-suffix rule context is a GNUmake idiom (line 583 of
Makefile)
*** Error code 1
Obviously, it works with gmake, but I feel this could be better if it
worked with normal make as this would improve
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 01:39 -0700, Brandon Davidson wrote:
I've got a couple more issues with the doveadm director interface:
1) If I use doveadm director remove to disable a host with active users,
the director seems to lose track of users mapped to that host.
Yes, that's what it was
At least can anyone explain what is the pattern from the map definition.
On 07/14/2010 01:38 PM, alex wrote:
Hi
I just configure dovecot with the second dictionary for the domain quota
dict {
quotadict = mysql:/usr/local/etc/dovecot-quota.conf
quota_domain =
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 12:30 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 14.7.2010, at 9.55, Brandon Davidson wrote:
If I attach to the stuck imap-login process, it's waiting in:
#0 0x00385c0c6070 in __write_nocancel () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1 0x003c5620c9a1 in login_proxy_state_notify ()
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 13:38 +0300, alex wrote:
and the dovecot-quota-domain.conf looks like this :
Looks ok.
The problem is that the dictionary table gets updated only with the
first mailbox informations (quota and messages for the first mailbox
within domain that is accessed).
What
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 11:31 +0200, Renaud Allard wrote:
I just tried to compile like I always do (using BSD make) and got:
Using $ in a non-suffix rule context is a GNUmake idiom (line 583 of
Makefile)
Yeah, this has been fixed since.
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 15:37 +0200, Daniel Stoye wrote:
thanks for the Info, we just installed RC2 - and something still seems
to be strange:
..
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) / FremdeOrdner/user3/INBOX
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) / FremdeOrdner/user3/INBOX
1 OK List completed.
The shared INBOX of
On 07/14/2010 05:20 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 13:38 +0300, alex wrote:
and the dovecot-quota-domain.conf looks like this :
Looks ok.
The problem is that the dictionary table gets updated only with the
first mailbox informations (quota and messages for the first mailbox
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 17:42 +0300, alex wrote:
- login with the first user
..
..so far so good
- login with the second user
..domain quota usage is unchange and messages the same.
A login doesn't change quota (the first login recalculates it, because
there is no row in dict). What
On 07/14/2010 05:55 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 17:42 +0300, alex wrote:
- login with the first user
..
..so far so good
- login with the second user
..domain quota usage is unchange and messages the same.
A login doesn't change quota (the first login
Hi everyone:
I´m trying to install imaptest on my server with Solaris 10, however i´m
found in this moment with some instalations problems. Anyone knows what
libraries need have installed ?
./configure --with-dovecot=/opt/setup/dovecot-1.2.10
make
Error:
make all-recursive
make[1]:
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 18:07 +0300, alex wrote:
The domain_quota is updated only with the new message. The two messages
and sizes, that already exists are not added to the domain quota.
Yes, that's what I tried to say in my previous mail. There is no easy
(automatic) way to initialize or
On 07/14/2010 06:22 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 18:07 +0300, alex wrote:
The domain_quota is updated only with the new message. The two messages
and sizes, that already exists are not added to the domain quota.
Yes, that's what I tried to say in my previous mail. There is
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 18:29 +0300, alex wrote:
Yes, that's what I tried to say in my previous mail. There is no easy
(automatic) way to initialize or recalculate domain quota.
Thanks Timo
What will be the hard way?
A quick and nasty fix, I think, will be to do a cron script to sum
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 10:22 -0500, Wilberth Perez wrote:
Hi everyone:
I´m trying to install imaptest on my server with Solaris 10, however i´m
found in this moment with some instalations problems. Anyone knows what
libraries need have installed ?
./configure
Hi Timo:
Yes, My Path /opt/setup/dovecot-1.2.10 contains Dovecot's sources.
So, I can´t use imaptest with dovecot 1.210 ?
Cheers .
wilberth.
El 14/07/2010 10:43 a.m., Timo Sirainen escribió:
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 10:22 -0500, Wilberth Perez wrote:
Hi everyone:
I´m trying to install
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 10:59 -0500, Wilberth Perez wrote:
So, I can´t use imaptest with dovecot 1.210 ?
You can use imaptest with any imap server. You just have to build it
against Dovecot v2.0 sources (there is no need to install Dovecot v2.0).
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:16:58 +0200 Stephan Bosch
step...@rename-it.nl wrote:
As a matter of fact, I haven't looked at TRE before. I'm quite
interested though, since it is backwards compatible with POSIX and
seems to be available in most systems. I'll give it a closer look,
also in terms of
Hi,
i need to restore some old mail backups from a system i wasnt the
admin. Emails are on Maildir, which i'm using on the actual server, so
should be no big deal. I'm just thinking of copying files from the
folders i need, from the old backup, to the specific dirs on the actual
-Original Message-
2) is there any way of having dovecot to calculating the S= and W=
parameters and renaming those files and, thus, avoiding some negative
impact caused by the lack of them ?
Anyway, the filenames themselves can't be renamed, because
the ,S=xx,W=yy is part of
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 13:12 -0700, Brad Davidson wrote:
-Original Message-
2) is there any way of having dovecot to calculating the S= and W=
parameters and renaming those files and, thus, avoiding some negative
impact caused by the lack of them ?
Anyway, the filenames
In v1.0 .. v1.1 deliver was writing incoming 128k mail to /tmp file (to
avoid reading it all into memory). In v1.2 I moved it to user's home
directory. This slowed deliveries for NFS users. Also people with
filesystem quota had trouble since now user required twice as much
available quota to save
Any thoughts?
Could the location be made dependant on the file size?
My usual setup is mfs on /tmp and ffs on /var/tmp, so /tmp being smaller and
faster and /var/tmp being larger and slower.
On 7/14/10 4:34 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
In v1.0 .. v1.1 deliver was writing incoming 128k mail to /tmp file (to
avoid reading it all into memory). In v1.2 I moved it to user's home
directory. This slowed deliveries for NFS users. Also people with
filesystem quota had trouble since now user
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 22:55 +0200, Edgar Fuß wrote:
Any thoughts?
Could the location be made dependant on the file size?
The file size isn't known beforehand. It's between 128 kB and whatever
the max. mail size is configured to be in your system.
Hi People,
Em 14/07/2010 17:20, Timo Sirainen escreveu:
If he's restoring from an old machine (they're not currently indexed by Dovecot
on the new server), they're going to get a new UID when Dovecot finds them
anyway, right?
Yes. But I was thinking he had already moved them and
Den 14.07.2010 22:34, skrev Timo Sirainen:
In v1.0 .. v1.1 deliver was writing incoming128k mail to /tmp file (to
avoid reading it all into memory). In v1.2 I moved it to user's home
directory. This slowed deliveries for NFS users. Also people with
filesystem quota had trouble since now user
Timo,
-Original Message-
From: Timo Sirainen [mailto:t...@iki.fi]
I can easily change this write to be nonblocking and just retry later
instead of hanging, but there is still a bug if director never reads it..
This should fix it: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/510b627687f8
Phil Howard ttip...@gmail.com:
I abandoned sendmail many years ago and haven't looked back. I tried
qmail and postfix, and was a lot happier with postfix. I overlooked
exim at the time, but from what little I've seen and heard, it should
be up there with postfix, making for a tough choice
Timo,
-Original Message-
From: Timo Sirainen [mailto:t...@iki.fi]
Yes, that's what it was intended to do.
OK. I guess I had figured that removing it from the director would also kill
any active proxy sessions, but that's obviously not the case.. it just removes
the host from the
On 14.7.2010, at 22.09, Leonardo Rodrigues wrote:
anything that can be done, during the real restoration of them, to get
their 'base filenames' renamed and getting the S= and W= parameters are
completly acceptable, as messages are NOT indexed by dovecot yet.
Maybe the easiest would be:
On 14.7.2010, at 23.00, Brad Davidson wrote:
Hmh.. I guess that would be nice, but also a bit annoying to do. It
would require each login process to have a connection to director
process, and currently there's no such connection (except for the notify
fifo, but that's wrong way).
Maybe
On 14.7.2010, at 22.02, Steven King wrote:
So why was the move made in the first place? Because a) some people had
small (maybe ramfs) /tmp and Dovecot was eating it all up and b) to
avoid any potential security issues with storing per-user files to a
shared directory.
I haven't seen
Em 14/07/2010 19:30, Timo Sirainen escreveu:
Maybe the easiest would be:
for file in *; do
deliver -u username -m dest-mailbox -p $file
done
that would through everything on INBOX there are some folders
on user's Maildir's that i'd like to maintain.
Timo ... is the S=
On 15.7.2010, at 0.05, Leonardo Rodrigues wrote:
Timo ... is the S= parameter simple the filesize or is there any other
calculation on that ?
Yes.
If i'm not mistaken, the W= is the filesize CR+LFed, which is probably not
the real size on Unix filesystems, which is not CR+LFed
Timo Sirainen put forth on 7/14/2010 3:34 PM:
Any thoughts?
Don't rely on an existing temp directory. Create /var/spool/dovecot/ and
/var/spool/dovecot/tmp/ with the installation script and assign the
appropriate permissions. This solves the current problem and gives you a
dedicated dovecot
41 matches
Mail list logo
