I plan to use two virtual domains and as many users for each domain with
postfix, dovecot, squirrelmail, postfix admin, and mysql on openSuse 11.2.
How best can you help me? I am going to use dovecot v2.0.
Thank you.
# Edmonds
We have -
Dovecot 1.0.15 (the default on Debian Lenny stable)
Thunderbird 3.1.4
In our installation the Inbox is a mbox and the other folders are maildir.
When we tag messages in Inbox, the tags disappear after a while. In the other
folders they stay.
I found two possible solutions suggested
Iv Ray wrote:
We have -
Dovecot 1.0.15 (the default on Debian Lenny stable) Thunderbird
3.1.4
snip
Would suggest not following the Debian Lenny stable version
(1.0.15), but compiling the current stable Dovecot?
The Debian backports service can update your version to Dovecot
1.2.13,
Hi Timo,
on my system (AIX 6.1 with xlc -q64) the configure script for
dovecot-2.0.2 breaks with:
checking whether fd passing works... no
configure: error: fd passing is required for Dovecot to work
This is also now fixed:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/bdf922d26534
Many
On 2010-09-21 10:26:49 +0200, mail...@securitylabs.it wrote:
Dovecot 1.2.14 + Vpopmail 5.4.30 it's fine here.
and now try it with 5.5;)
darix
--
openSUSE - SUSE Linux is my linux
openSUSE is good for you
www.opensuse.org
Hi to all,
I have a Debian 4.0 x86_64 server and installed Dovecot from the
repositories
ii dovecot-common
1.0.rc15-2etch5
ii dovecot-imapd 1.0.rc15-2etch5
ii dovecot-pop3d 1.0.rc15-2etch5
Recently I'm getting a lot of these messages
pop3[24594]:
On 21/09/2010 11:38, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
On 2010-09-21 10:26:49 +0200, mail...@securitylabs.it wrote:
Dovecot 1.2.14 + Vpopmail 5.4.30 it's fine here.
and now try it with 5.5;)
It's not considered stable, on sourceforge 5.5.0 is under
vpopmail-devel. The latest stable il 5.4.30, so I'm
I have unzipped Dovecot v2.0.2 and configured with *--with-sql=yes
--with-mysql*
*make* *make install* run well and throw files around.
/usr/local/etc/ has no files but another folder dovecot/ with only the
README file
I see the other files are in /usr/local/share/doc/dovecot/
The last I tried
Thank you Ron and Daniel.
We tried the mbox_lazy_writes=no option and it seems to work. It was the
easiest thing to try.
We will now attempt upgrade to the Dovecot stable and switch the Inbox to
maildir.
Thank you for your kind comments.
Iv
On 21.09.2010, at 12:02, Daniel Luttermann wrote:
Daniel Luttermann put forth on 9/21/2010 5:02 AM:
I would also use maildir for all mailboxes instead of mbox for
inbox...
Do you have technical justification for this recommendation, or is this
merely personal preference? If both exist on NFS storage in a Dovecot
cluster environment I would
Iv Ray put forth on 9/21/2010 5:21 AM:
We will now attempt upgrade to the Dovecot stable and switch the Inbox to
maildir.
One thing at a time. Do one or the other first, wait a few days or a
week to make sure it is working as expected. Only then perform the
other. If you do both
On 21/09/2010 11:39, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Daniel Luttermann put forth on 9/21/2010 5:02 AM:
I would also use maildir for all mailboxes instead of mbox for inbox...
Do you have technical justification for this recommendation, or is
this merely personal preference? If both exist on NFS storage
On 21.9.2010, at 1.46, Funda Wang wrote:
But for shared libraries, if there are symbols defined in main program
rather than library itself, that means libraries are only likely to
work invoking the program,
Yes, that's how it was meant to be used.
which is wrong. Because the library should
Stan Hoeppner wrote on 21.09.2010:
Daniel Luttermann put forth on 9/21/2010 5:02 AM:
I would also use maildir for all mailboxes instead of mbox for
inbox...
Do you have technical justification for this recommendation, or is this
merely personal preference? If both exist on NFS storage in
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Daniel Luttermann put forth on 9/21/2010 5:02 AM:
I would also use maildir for all mailboxes instead of mbox for
inbox...
Do you have technical justification for this recommendation, or is this
merely personal preference?
Could I offer our reasoning for choosing
Could I offer our reasoning for choosing Maildir?
I made the decision that we would use Maildir because I was worried
about the effect of loss of a single file. As I understood it, mbox
stores all the messages in single file and, if the file was corrupted
and couldn't be recovered for any
On 2010-09-21 5:41 AM, enid vx enid...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a Debian 4.0 x86_64 server and installed Dovecot from the
repositories
ii dovecot-common
1.0.rc15-2etch5
snip
What problem could this be and how can I resolve it?
Your first task is to upgrade. 1.0rc15 is way too old and
On 2010-09-21 5:50 AM, Edmonds Namasenda namase...@gmail.com wrote:
I have unzipped Dovecot v2.0.2
Well, you should at least start out with the latest version (2.0.3)...
The last I tried dovecot was with v1.0.13 and I would like help to achieve
the set-up as described below.
All you provided
Hi,
I am having trouble with the quota plugin with deliver. In the auth logs, I
see that dovecot is able to get the attribute value just fine:
***
Sep 21 17:49:30 dawnone dovecot: auth(default): ldap(cot,127.0.0.1): result:
uid(user)=cot uidNumber(userdb_uid)=1011 gidNumber(userdb_gid)=1011
On 2010-09-20 5:27 PM, Marcus Rueckert da...@opensu.se wrote:
i run with postfixadmin[1]+mysql+dovecot+postfix
+1 for postfixadmin+mysql for user account management.
--
Best regards,
Charles
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 13:56 +0200, Jakob Curdes wrote:
b) file is corrupt (altered by two processes, bad sector, filesystem
corruption on file level) - the mbox file can be repaired easily, if you
want, by hand.
With mbox data is moved in-place within the file while doing expunge. A
crash
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 18:02 +0530, Mohit Chawla wrote:
***
Sep 21 17:49:30 dawnone dovecot: auth(default): ldap(cot,127.0.0.1): result:
uid(user)=cot uidNumber(userdb_uid)=1011 gidNumber(userdb_gid)=1011
homeDirectory(userdb_home)=/home/cot
Hi!
I have some questions about doveadm-expunge's debug messages.
# /usr/local/bin/doveadm -Dv expunge -u user mailbox 'sa.*' SAVEDBEFORE 6h
doveadm(root): Debug: Loading modules from directory: /usr/local/lib/dovecot
doveadm(root): Debug: Module loaded:
b) file is corrupt (altered by two processes, bad sector, filesystem
corruption on file level) - the mbox file can be repaired easily, if you
want, by hand.
With mbox data is moved in-place within the file while doing expunge. A
crash in the middle of expunge corrupts the mbox file,
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 15:09 +0200, LEVAI Daniel wrote:
I have some questions about doveadm-expunge's debug messages.
# /usr/local/bin/doveadm -Dv expunge -u user mailbox 'sa.*' SAVEDBEFORE 6h
doveadm(root): Debug: expire: Searching only users listed in expire database
Hi,
I have dovecot 2.0.3.
Mailboxes have been converted with dsync from mbox to maildir last week.
There it was still version 2.0.2.
A user produces now this error:
imap(userx): Panic: file mailbox-list-fs.c: line 150
(fs_list_get_path): assertion failed:
Hi Charles,
I did upgrade (with some difficulties because the server is in production)
with the tar.gz version 2.0.3 but although these messages keep repeating.
Is this problem related with the Dovecot sw or related with the OS or server
HW?
Thanks,
Enid
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Charles
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 16:13 +0200, enid vx wrote:
Hi Charles,
I did upgrade (with some difficulties because the server is in production)
with the tar.gz version 2.0.3 but although these messages keep repeating.
Is this problem related with the Dovecot sw or related with the OS or server
HW?
Hi Enid,
Please don't top-post...
On 2010-09-21 10:13 AM, enid vx enid...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
Your first task is to upgrade. 1.0rc15 is way too old and just plain
unsupported.
If you must upgrade the entire OS, it is now time to do so.
I
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Charles Marcus
cmar...@media-brokers.comwrote:
Hi Enid,
Please don't top-post...
On 2010-09-21 10:13 AM, enid vx enid...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
Your first task is to upgrade. 1.0rc15 is way too old and just
Charles, I am new to this v2.*
I was used to a different layout for v1.* and that is why I am here.
Basically, I am starting from scratch.
I have untarred v2.0.2, ran *./configure --with-sql=yes* --with-mysql , make
, make install.
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Charles Marcus
On 2010-09-21 11:04 AM, enid vx enid...@gmail.com wrote:
The output of doveconf -n:
Log entries exhibiting the problem?
--
Best regards,
Charles
Charles, I am new to this v2.*
I was used to a different layout for v1.* and that is why I am here.
Basically, I am starting from scratch.
I have untarred v2.0.2, ran *./configure --with-sql=yes --with-mysql* , *
make* , *make install*.
Before after that, I could find my files in /usr/local/etc/
Hi,
I've upgraded from 2.0.1 to 2.0.3 and while the former starts, the
latter doesn't (the config is the same). It bails with:
Sep 21 17:15:32 locsocs dovecot: ssl-params: Fatal: Dovecot built
without SSL support
Sep 21 17:15:32 locsocs dovecot: master: Error: service(ssl-params):
command
On 21/09/2010 16:14, Edmonds Namasenda wrote:
I have copied the *example-config*s to /usr/local/etc/dovecot/ but
literally every change I make as of v1.* is not valid. I wish to use
protocals IMAP POP3 then authenticate with shadow and passwd for
system users and mysql for the virtual users.
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 17:21 +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
I've upgraded from 2.0.1 to 2.0.3 and while the former starts, the
latter doesn't (the config is the same). It bails with:
Sep 21 17:15:32 locsocs dovecot: ssl-params: Fatal: Dovecot built
without SSL support
Sep 21 17:15:32 locsocs
On 09/21/2010 05:28 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 17:21 +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
I've upgraded from 2.0.1 to 2.0.3 and while the former starts, the
latter doesn't (the config is the same). It bails with:
Sep 21 17:15:32 locsocs dovecot: ssl-params: Fatal: Dovecot built
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 16:10 +0200, Burckhard Schmidt wrote:
A user produces now this error:
imap(userx): Panic: file mailbox-list-fs.c: line 150
(fs_list_get_path): assertion failed:
(mailbox_list_is_valid_pattern(_list, name))
There are lots of ways how the code could get here.
On the Dovecot home page http://www.dovecot.org/ we have a link
Documentation which links to the Dovecot 1.x wiki (
http://wiki.dovecot.org/ ).
There is a question mark in my mind as to whether that is a good idea
considering as how the current stable version of Dovecot appears to be
2.0.x.
Timo...
Using the src/lib-mail/test-istream-header-filter.c as example, and
following your tips to jump my desired header value, but i need to store the
value from the Header filtered.
In the Exemple, the callback is this:
static void filter_callback(struct message_header_line *hdr,
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 16:51 +0100, William Blunn wrote:
Perhaps the Documentation link on the home page could be re-worked to
something like
Documentation v2.x v1.x
where v2.x and v1.x are links to the two wikis.
Wonder if http://dovecot.org/index2.html looks ok.
Also I've been
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 15:07 -0300, Alex Baule wrote:
static void filter_callback(struct message_header_line *hdr,
bool *matched, void *context ATTR_UNUSED)
..
What i try to understand is how the structs work, it's save the entire
header or every line from header call the
We have a plethora of accounts for which we would like to enable
CRAM-MD5 but their passwords are stored as MD5 hashes. Is there anything
we can do? Can we take a linux MD5 hashed password (e.g.
$1$fac330ee$wd6Tll...) and convert it to dovecot's CRAM-MD5 format (e.g.
{CRAM-MD5}b3f297...)?
Thanks!
Hello!
Let me smuggle 2 questions in 1 email:
1) I upgraded from 1.1.7 to 2.0.1, but couldn't get it to work, because the
'dovecot + postfix sasl howto' doesn't seem to be updated and the old sasl
settings are incompatible with new version. How do I set up sasl with dovecot2
? Is there any
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 11:24 -0700, David Jonas wrote:
We have a plethora of accounts for which we would like to enable
CRAM-MD5 but their passwords are stored as MD5 hashes. Is there anything
we can do? Can we take a linux MD5 hashed password (e.g.
$1$fac330ee$wd6Tll...) and convert it to
On 2010-09-21 2:17 PM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
Another possibility could be to just make wiki.dovecot.org redirect to
wiki2.dovecot.org and wiki.dovecot.org/blah/ to wiki1.dovecot.org/blah/.
Existing links would work and then wiki2 links would start showing up
more and maybe some day
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 11:26 -0700, Igor Kowalski wrote:
Hello!
Let me smuggle 2 questions in 1 email:
1) I upgraded from 1.1.7 to 2.0.1, but couldn't get it to work, because the
'dovecot + postfix sasl howto' doesn't seem to be updated and the old sasl
settings are incompatible with new
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 14:32 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
Just have wiki.dovecot.org be a landing page with very prominent links
to each version.
To avoid breaking existing links, wiki.dovecot.org/Foo would either have
to:
a) automatically redirect to one of wiki1/Foo, wiki2/Foo
b) Show the
On 2010-09-21 2:38 PM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
Wonder how much trouble b) would be to implement. Still, this behavior
has the downside of getting lots of links to wiki1, wiki2, etc. all
around the internet which could be pointing to obsolete information by
the time they're being read
On 21/09/2010 19:17, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Wonder if http://dovecot.org/index2.html looks ok.
Interesting. Though for me, the version numbers are too small to be
useful. I tried it through Firefox 3.6.8 and Microsoft's version 8
offering with the same result.
Also I've been wondering about
On 2010-09-21 3:53 PM, William Blunn bill+dove...@blunn.org wrote:
On 21/09/2010 19:17, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Wonder if http://dovecot.org/index2.html looks ok.
Interesting. Though for me, the version numbers are too small to be
useful. I tried it through Firefox 3.6.8 and Microsoft's version
Hi,
Thanks Timo, you were right , deliver was missing the -d parameter.
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 18:02 +0530, Mohit Chawla wrote:
***
Sep 21 17:49:30 dawnone dovecot: auth(default): ldap(cot,127.0.0.1):
result:
52 matches
Mail list logo
