On 10.3.2011, at 23.49, Mike Abbott wrote:
>> What kind of a test are you doing that causes these warnings?
>
> A stress test which manipulates messages via IMAP fetch, copy, search,
> append, store flags, expunge, etc. and also sends mail via SMTP. I'll try to
> narrow down if there's a speci
> What kind of a test are you doing that causes these warnings?
A stress test which manipulates messages via IMAP fetch, copy, search, append,
store flags, expunge, etc. and also sends mail via SMTP. I'll try to narrow
down if there's a specific command which triggers it, or if dovecot-lda does
On 10.3.2011, at 23.24, Mike Abbott wrote:
>> Maybe it has to do with the number of mails in the mailbox?
>
> Clever thought, but while some of the users receiving the warnings have 30k
> messages, others have only a few hundred.
What kind of a test are you doing that causes these warnings?
> Maybe it has to do with the number of mails in the mailbox?
Clever thought, but while some of the users receiving the warnings have 30k
messages, others have only a few hundred.
> msgs=1 delete=10 expunge=10
Five hours running, no warnings. Any other thoughts?
On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 11:31 -0500, Enright, Mike wrote:
> That did work much better, but I still don't see THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT.
> Was I mistaken that Dovecot supported that? I thought I read it somewhere.
There is no THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT support, because very few people have
ever asked for it
Excellent!
That did work much better, but I still don't see THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT.
Was I mistaken that Dovecot supported that? I thought I read it somewhere.
Thanks
# telnet localhost imap
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape character is '^]'.
* OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ S
On Thursday 10 March 2011 17:14:05 Enright, Mike wrote:
> # telnet localhost imap
> Trying 127.0.0.1...
> Connected to localhost.
> Escape character is '^]'.
> * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE
> AUTH=PLAIN AUTH=LOGIN] Dovecot ready. 1 capability
> * CAPABIL
Greetings list.
Pardon the ignorance.
I am working on CentOS 5.2. Unfortunately the repo version of Dovecot is 1.0.X.
This works fine mind you but it doesn't have ORDEREDSUBJECT Threading support,
which I need. I downloaded 2.0.11 and built from source, but now I don't see
any Threading suppor
I'm trying to figure out which permissions will be the best to handle most of
tasks (for use in rpm package) for configuration files.
Basically
/etc/dovecot/ dir
/etc/dovecot/* files
/etc/dovecot/conf.d/ dir
/etc/dovecot/conf.d/files
dovecot binaries, deliver mainly
For example deliver needs
Chris Wilson put forth on 3/10/2011 6:09 AM:
> Apparently your server doesn't want me to reply:
>
> A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
> recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
>
> s...@hardwarefreak.com
> SMTP error from r
* Cristiane França :
> Hi,
>
> The Dovecot 2.0 has some limit size for the mailbox?
> The server is 64 bits and would like to have mailbox with bigger size that 2
> GB.
No problem with Maildir or mdbox.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsme
Hi,
The Dovecot 2.0 has some limit size for the mailbox?
The server is 64 bits and would like to have mailbox with bigger size that 2
GB.
Hi Timo,
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 9.3.2011, at 18.02, Chris Wilson wrote:
>
> > I think it would be a good idea for me to move from mbox to mdbox, as I
> > have 57,000 messages in my inbox, and clients hang for a minute whenever
> > they request a CHECK, or Dovecot feels t
On 9.3.2011, at 18.02, Chris Wilson wrote:
> I think it would be a good idea for me to move from mbox to mdbox, as I
> have 57,000 messages in my inbox, and clients hang for a minute whenever
> they request a CHECK, or Dovecot feels the need to run one itself.
mbox_very_dirty_syncs=yes should g
On 10.3.2011, at 2.43, Mike Abbott wrote:
>> Can you easily reproduce this by running imaptest against a single user?
>
> Nope. Any special imaptest arguments other than user=... pass=... host=...
> mbox=...? I ran it for a few hours with none of the warnings.
Maybe it has to do with the numb
Hi Stan,
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > Chris Wilson put forth on 3/9/2011 10:02 AM:
> >
> > > I think it would be a good idea for me to move from mbox to mdbox, as I
> > > have 57,000 messages in my inbox, and clients hang for a minute wh
Hi Stan,
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Chris Wilson put forth on 3/9/2011 10:02 AM:
>
> > I think it would be a good idea for me to move from mbox to mdbox, as I
> > have 57,000 messages in my inbox, and clients hang for a minute whenever
> > they request a CHECK, or Dovecot feels
Chris Wilson put forth on 3/9/2011 10:02 AM:
> Hi all,
>
> I think it would be a good idea for me to move from mbox to mdbox, as I
> have 57,000 messages in my inbox, and clients hang for a minute whenever
> they request a CHECK, or Dovecot feels the need to run one itself.
Why do you believe s
On 09 Mar 2011, at 20:16, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 8.3.2011, at 19.42, Thierry de Montaudry wrote:
>
>>> So... if the httpd process is the one consuming all of the CPU, doesn't
>>> it stand to reason that it might be something to do with one of your web
>>> apps, and not dovecot?
>>>
>> But the
19 matches
Mail list logo
