Hello, Stan,
in fact the only thing I miss even with my current scheme is permanent
ID assigned to the message so I can easily find it despite the IMAP
mailbox it is now (so if someone moved the message from one
mailbox/folder to another, the ID allows to retrieve it fast anyway).
You see, w
Oh, that's the point to consider.
But I must confess I'm in love with Maildir for maybe 10 years for that simple
fact I can do anything with each and every single message even on disk (=much
faster than via IMAP). If I would deal with mbox directly I'd need to parse
huge files, b.
Are the
- Forwarded Message -
From: Scott Lewis
To: "dovecot@dovecot.org"
Sent: Thursday, 3 November 2011 4:31 PM
Subject: patching dovecot for sieve/managesieve support, centos 5.6?
Hi all,
I am having real trouble when attempting to patch dovecot 1.2 to include the
Pidgeonhole sieve sup
On 11/9/2011 10:40 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 19:16 +0300, Alexander Chekalin wrote:
>> Will also try to use full text search,
>> but afraid of index size (and I need no search on body, just on headers).
>
> It wouldn't be difficult to patch Dovecot to skip indexing message
On 11/9/2011 10:16 AM, Alexander Chekalin wrote:
> Thanks, Robert,
>
> will take a look at.
>
> What I'm afraid for is how database storage should be planned (storage,
> CPU, RAM, scaling when will be over-filled). When dealing with files
> (I'm using maildir)
Bingo.^^^
Maildir is very
Hi list,
I have problem with deleting sub-folder.
I use thunderbird 8.0 as a client and dovecot 2.0.9 with imap protocol
as a server. I use dovecot with tb-extra-mailbox-sep parameter. I use
mbox mailboxes and thunderbird with *not checked* option 'server
supports folders that contain sub-fold
On 11/09/2011 10:29 AM Thomas Koch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> somebody from the kolab groupware project recently explained me that the Bus-
> Factor[1] of around 1 would be one of their primary reasons not to use
> Dovecot
> and stick with Cyrus.
And what is their primary reason for the lame excuse?
Too
Sven Hartge svenhartge.de> writes:
>
> Nikolaos Milas noa.gr> wrote:
> > On 1/4/2011 11:09 πμ, Sven Hartge wrote:
>
> >> Have a look at the ppolicy slapd.overlay. This will solve your
> >> problem.
hello all
Sorry for the delay in the response
I checked the ppolicy overlay but without success.
On 2011-11-04 22:26, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Nov 4 15:10:42 mail dovecot: imap (t...@aaaone.net): Error: Corrupted
transaction log file /mail/3340444/.TestMails/dovecot.index.log seq 2:
indexid changed 1320419300 -> 1320419441 (sync_offset=0)
Session A had TestMails open and created with index f
On 06.11.2011 17:03, wrote e-frog:
1 lsub "" "virtual/*"
* LSUB () "/" "virtual"
* LSUB () "/" "virtual/Lists"
* LSUB () "/" "virtual/unread"
1 OK Lsub completed.
Just tested this again with 2.1beta1 with the same result.
I am familiar with this article
http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA#multipleuids
I want to disable setuid-root, but I don't know the default group and
permissions.
sudo chgrp root /usr/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda
sudo chmod 00750 /usr/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda
but my delivery is still failing
Nov 9
On 11/09/11 20:46, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 20:44 +0200, Adrian Minta wrote:
Is the quota in the database 1096 or>2GB? i.e. is the problem with
reading it, or updating it? In general the quota code uses 64bit
integers everywhere so this shouldn't be happening.
In the databas
On Nov 9, 2011, at 7:53 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 10:29 +0100, Thomas Koch wrote:
>
>> Somehow related: Since the free software world[2] slowly converges towards
>> GIT
>> as the "one and only" VCS, have you thought about a switch? It's much more
>> likely that somebody
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 20:44 +0200, Adrian Minta wrote:
> > Is the quota in the database 1096 or>2GB? i.e. is the problem with
> > reading it, or updating it? In general the quota code uses 64bit
> > integers everywhere so this shouldn't be happening.
> >
> >
> In the database quota field is 2048000
Is the quota in the database 1096 or>2GB? i.e. is the problem with
reading it, or updating it? In general the quota code uses 64bit
integers everywhere so this shouldn't be happening.
In the database quota field is 204800.
--
Best regards,
Adrian MintaMA3173-RIPE, www.minta.ro
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 20:35 +0200, Adrian Minta wrote:
> On 11/09/11 19:59, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > Anyway, here's a guess: the quota is stored in mysql in "integer", which
> > has a maximum value of 2 GB. Actually looks like Dovecot wiki pages also
> > use "integer". Replace that with "bigint" an
On 11/09/11 19:59, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Anyway, here's a guess: the quota is stored in mysql in "integer", which
has a maximum value of 2 GB. Actually looks like Dovecot wiki pages also
use "integer". Replace that with "bigint" and recalculate quota and it
should work.
Actually the mysql part i
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 14:59 +0200, Adrian M wrote:
> Hello list,
> I believe I found a bug with quota.
> The dovecot quota replies with incorrect values when the mailbox is above 2GB.
>
> du -ks returns 2005764bytes
>
> dovecot IMAP on the same user/directory:
> 1 getquotaroot inbox
> * QUOTAROOT
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 10:54 +0100, David Ocana wrote:
> I've been trying to set up dovecot 2.0.15, everything seems to work
> pretty well except for the quota feature. I would like to set a quota
> limit only for the Inbox folder. I configured two namespaces,
> according to some posts from Timo
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 19:16 +0300, Alexander Chekalin wrote:
> Will also try to use full text search,
> but afraid of index size (and I need no search on body, just on headers).
It wouldn't be difficult to patch Dovecot to skip indexing message
bodies. Of course then you'd need to remember to kee
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 18:34 +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> I have today tried compiling this -beta, but I saw so many warning about
> linking libraries, which I ignored,
Probably plugin warnings which you can safely ignore.
> Making all in wiki
> make: don't know how to make 2b. Stop
Looks
Thanks, Robert,
will take a look at.
What I'm afraid for is how database storage should be planned (storage,
CPU, RAM, scaling when will be over-filled). When dealing with files
(I'm using maildir), it is much easy to understand and to fix just about
everything. Adding database involves tune
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 01:35, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/beta/dovecot-2.1.beta1.tar.gz
> http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/beta/dovecot-2.1.beta1.tar.gz.sig
>
> Here's the first beta release of Dovecot v2.1. This version has already
> been tested quite a lot, so I'm not
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 16:57 +0300, Alexander Chekalin wrote:
> The problem is that when my archive become big (several years), it
> appears to be painful to find specified message(s). When someone
> suddenly needs to find his/her old message, it is mostly guesses like 'I
> think the message was
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 15:24 +0100, Maria Arrea wrote:
> Timo, maybe you have mispelled the command?
Minor changes, I tested that this actually works:
doveadm -f tab fetch -A size.physical before 365d
The -A parameter requires that you use a userdb that supports iteration.
With SQL you need to pr
Timo, maybe you have mispelled the command?
> We are using dovecot 2.0.15+mdbox+zlib and we are evaluating to buy > cheap
> sata-based iscsi storage / sata-NFS. We want to evaluate how > much space
> would be needed in alternate storage BEFORE buying it. I > have been reading
> about dovead
Am 09.11.2011 14:57, schrieb Alexander Chekalin:
> Hello,
>
> I try to create some kind of mail backup system. What I need is system
> that will store mail for the whole domain, and allow me to restore
> messages from/to specified email at that domain.
>
> The scheme is pretty simple: on our main
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 14:19 +0100, Maria Arrea wrote:
> We are using dovecot 2.0.15+mdbox+zlib and we are evaluating to buy
> cheap sata-based iscsi storage / sata-NFS. We want to evaluate how
> much space would be needed in alternate storage BEFORE buying it. I
> have been reading about doveadm
Hello,
I try to create some kind of mail backup system. What I need is system
that will store mail for the whole domain, and allow me to restore
messages from/to specified email at that domain.
The scheme is pretty simple: on our main mail server the SMTP server
itself has a rule to send a c
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 10:29 +0100, Thomas Koch wrote:
> somebody from the kolab groupware project recently explained me that the Bus-
> Factor[1] of around 1 would be one of their primary reasons not to use
> Dovecot
> and stick with Cyrus.
>
> What do you think about that? Is the bus factor mu
Hello
We are using dovecot 2.0.15+mdbox+zlib and we are evaluating to buy cheap
sata-based iscsi storage / sata-NFS. We want to evaluate how much space would
be needed in alternate storage BEFORE buying it. I have been reading about
doveadm altmove. We want to move ALL messages older than a ye
Hello list,
I believe I found a bug with quota.
The dovecot quota replies with incorrect values when the mailbox is above 2GB.
du -ks returns 2005764bytes
dovecot IMAP on the same user/directory:
1 getquotaroot inbox
* QUOTAROOT "INBOX" "user"
* QUOTA "user" (STORAGE 1096 200)* QUOTAROOT "INB
Hi Sandro,
I've been asking myself whether I should include Debian in the list. You're
right that there are also other VCS' used in Debian. Zack's statistics say:
arch22
bzr 271
cvs 31
darcs 382
git 5230
hg 63
mtn 13
svn 4843
http://upsilon.cc/~zack/stuff/
Hello,
I've been trying to set up dovecot 2.0.15, everything seems to work
pretty well except for the quota feature. I would like to set a quota
limit only for the Inbox folder. I configured two namespaces, according
to some posts from Timo Sirainen
(http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2006-July/
Am Mittwoch, 9. November 2011, 10:29:37 schrieb Thomas Koch:
Hi,
> somebody from the kolab groupware project recently explained me that the
> Bus- Factor[1] of around 1 would be one of their primary reasons not to
> use Dovecot and stick with Cyrus.
The problem is:
Even it Timo will be hitten b
On 11/09/2011 10:29 AM, Thomas Koch wrote:
Somehow related: Since the free software world[2] slowly converges towards GIT
as the "one and only" VCS, have you thought about a switch? It's much more
likely that somebody checks out your code, looks into it and provides patches
if the VCS is already
Hi,
somebody from the kolab groupware project recently explained me that the Bus-
Factor[1] of around 1 would be one of their primary reasons not to use Dovecot
and stick with Cyrus.
What do you think about that? Is the bus factor much higher then 1?
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bus_factor
> How do you handle >> 10 TB mailstore?
ZFS: no need to fsck.
GlusterFS: "always-online".
On Nov 8, 2011, at 6:19 AM, Peer Heinlein wrote:
>
> Having > 10 TByte mailstore filesystem-checks takes too much time.
>
> At the moment we have four different partitions, but I don't like to set
> syml
38 matches
Mail list logo
