Can anyone help me figure out why email in a sub-folder (created using
Thunderbird) of a dovecot namespace will not display in Thunderbird?
...
Hello,
I have dovecot installed with the configuration below.
One of the subfolders created (using the email client) under the
'/home/vpopmail/domains/m
On 1/18/2012 7:54 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 20:44 +0800, Lee Standen wrote:
>> * All mail storage presented via NFS over 10Gbps Ethernet (Jumbo Frames)
>>
>> * Postfix will feed new email to Dovecot via LMTP
>>
>> * Dovecot servers have been split based on their role
>>
>>
Am 10.01.2012 16:32, schrieb Jürgen Obermann:
I have the following problem with doveadm:
# gdb --args /opt/local/bin/doveadm -v mailbox status -u
userxy/g029 'messages' "Software-alle/AK-Software-Tagung"
GNU gdb 5.3
Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered b
On 18.1.2012, at 22.41, Markus Fritz wrote:
> passdb:
>driver: sql
>args: /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf
> userdb:
>driver: static
>args: uid=5000 gid=5000 home=/var/vmail/%d/%n/Maildir allow_all_users=yes
You use sql as passdb, static as userdb.
> password_query = SELECT email
On 18.1.2012, at 21.49, Mark Moseley wrote:
>> What's the problem with director-based architecture?
>
> Nothing, per se. It's just that migrating to mdbox *and* to a director
> architecture is quite a bit more added complexity than simply
> migrating to mdbox alone.
Yes, I agree it's safer to do
I tried to set a quota setting. I installed dovecot with newest
version, patched it and started it.
dovecot -n:
# 1.2.15: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 x86_64 Debian 6.0.3 ext4
log_timestamp: %Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S
protocols: imap imaps pop3 pop3s
ssl_listen: 143
ssl_cipher_lis
On 18.1.2012, at 22.14, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
>>> unfortunately I haven't tested that patch, so I have no idea if it
>>> fixed the issues or not...
>>
>> I'm not sure if that patch is useful or not. The important patch to fix it
>> is http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/71084b799a6c
>
>
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 09:03:18PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 18.1.2012, at 20.51, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
>
> >> What's the problem with director-based architecture?
> >
> > It hasn't been working reliably for lmtp in v2.0.
>
> Yes, besides that :)
Besides that it's great!
> > unfor
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 18.1.2012, at 19.54, Mark Moseley wrote:
>
>> I'm in the middle of working on a Maildir->mdbox migration as well,
>> and likewise, over NFS (all Netapps but moving to Sun), and likewise
>> with split LDA and IMAP/POP servers (and both of t
On 18.1.2012, at 20.51, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 07:58:31PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>
>>> --i.e. all the
>>> suggestions at http://wiki2.dovecot.org/NFS. Is that definitely not
>>> the case? Is there anything else (beyond moving to a director-based
>>> architectur
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 07:58:31PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> > --i.e. all the
> > suggestions at http://wiki2.dovecot.org/NFS. Is that definitely not
> > the case? Is there anything else (beyond moving to a director-based
> > architecture) that can mitigate the risk of index corruption? In o
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 14:41 -0800, Don Buchholz wrote:
I've been having some problems with IMAP user connections to the Dovecot
(v2.0.8) server. The following message is being logged.
Jan 16 10:51:36 postal dovecot: master: Warning:
service(imap-login): process
On 18.1.2012, at 19.54, Mark Moseley wrote:
> I'm in the middle of working on a Maildir->mdbox migration as well,
> and likewise, over NFS (all Netapps but moving to Sun), and likewise
> with split LDA and IMAP/POP servers (and both of those served out of
> pools). I was hoping doing things like s
>>> * All mail storage presented via NFS over 10Gbps Ethernet (Jumbo Frames)
>>>
>>> * Postfix will feed new email to Dovecot via LMTP
>>>
>>> * Dovecot servers have been split based on their role
>>>
>>> - Dovecot LDA Servers (running LMTP protocol)
>>>
>>> - Dovecot POP/IMAP servers (running P
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 17:17 -0800, Mark Moseley wrote:
>> Just had a minor suggestion, with no clue how hard/easy it would be to
>> implement:
>>
>> The %f flag in deliver_log_format seems to pick up the From: header,
>> instead of the "MAIL
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:31:49 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 18:19 +0200, Eugene Paskevich wrote:
>> mailbox.c: In function 'antispam_save_begin':
>> mailbox.c:138:12: error: 'struct mail_save_context' has no member
named
>> 'copying'
>
> The "copying" should be changed to
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 18:19 +0200, Eugene Paskevich wrote:
> >> mailbox.c: In function 'antispam_save_begin':
> >> mailbox.c:138:12: error: 'struct mail_save_context' has no member named
> >> 'copying'
> >
> > The "copying" should be changed to "copying_via_save".
>
> Thank you, Timo.
> Would #if
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:34:18 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 11:07 +, interfaSys sàrl wrote:
Here is what I get when I try to compile the antispam plugin agaisnt
Dovecot 2.1
**
mailbox.c: In function 'antispam_save_begin':
mailbox.c:138:12: error: 'struct mai
On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 18:03 +0100, Axel Luttgens wrote:
> Up to now, I only had the opportunity to quickly read the wiki page, and have
> a small question; one may read:
>
> process_min_avail
> Minimum number of processes that always should be available to accept more
> client connections. For s
On Sun, 2012-01-15 at 14:11 +0100, Pascal Volk wrote:
> Core was generated by `doveadm mailbox list -u
> jane@example.com /*'.
Finally fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev/99ea6da7dc99
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 23:21 +0800, Lee Standen wrote:
> Out of interest, has the NFS issue been tested on NFS4? My
> understanding is that NFS4 has a lot of fixes for the locking/caching
> problems that plague NFS3, and we were planning to use NFS4 from day
> one.
I've tried with Linux NFS4 se
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 22:36 +0800, Lee Standen wrote:
> How about this... are there any tools available (that you know of) to
> capture real live customer POP3/IMAP traffic and replay it against a
> separate system? That might be a feasible option for doing a
> like-for-like comparison in our
Out of interest, has the NFS issue been tested on NFS4? My
understanding is that NFS4 has a lot of fixes for the locking/caching
problems that plague NFS3, and we were planning to use NFS4 from day
one.
If this hasn't been tested, is there some kind of load simulator that
we could run to see
On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 17:05 +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> ./autogen failed:
>
> $ ./autogen.sh
> libtoolize: Consider adding `AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR([m4])' to configure.in and
> libtoolize: rerunning libtoolize, to keep the correct libtool macros in-tree.
> libtoolize: Consider adding `-I m4' to
On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 11:42 +0100, RaSca wrote:
> passdb sql {
> args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf
> }
> userdb passwd {
> }
> userdb static {
> args = uid=5000 gid=5000 home=/mail/mailboxes/%d/%n@%d
> allow_all_users=yes
> }
You're using SQL only for passdb lookup.
> plugi
On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 17:17 -0800, Mark Moseley wrote:
> Just had a minor suggestion, with no clue how hard/easy it would be to
> implement:
>
> The %f flag in deliver_log_format seems to pick up the From: header,
> instead of the "MAIL FROM:<...>" arg. It'd be handy to have a %F that
> shows the
On 18.01.2012 21:54, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 20:44 +0800, Lee Standen wrote:
I've been desperately trying to find some comparative performance
information about the different mailbox formats supported by Dovecot
in
order to make an assessment on which format is right for ou
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 11:07 +, interfaSys sàrl wrote:
> Here is what I get when I try to compile the antispam plugin agaisnt
> Dovecot 2.1
>
> **
> mailbox.c: In function 'antispam_save_begin':
> mailbox.c:138:12: error: 'struct mail_save_context' has no member named
> 'copying'
T
On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 14:38 +0200, Jason X, Maney wrote:
> Jan 16 14:18:16 myservername dovecot: pop3(userA): Error: user molla:
> Initialization failed: mail_location not set and autodetection failed: Mail
> storage autodetection failed with home=/home/userA
As it says.
> Yet my config also come
Am 18.01.2012 13:58, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
> Hi,
>
> A small update: My Dovecot support company finally has web pages:
> http://www.dovecot.fi/
>
> We've also started providing 24/7 support.
>
>
Hi Timo, very cool !
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Hello,
I have dovecot installed with the configuration below.
One of the subfolders created (using the email client) under the
'/home/vpopmail/domains/mydomain.com/shared/projects' share no longer
(it used to) displays the files located in it. There are about 150
folders under the '/home/vpopmail/
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 20:44 +0800, Lee Standen wrote:
> I've been desperately trying to find some comparative performance
> information about the different mailbox formats supported by Dovecot in
> order to make an assessment on which format is right for our environment.
Unfortunately there aren'
Spanish edu site here, 80k users, 4,5 TB of email, 6.000 iops
(indexes) + 9.000 iops (mdboxes) in working hours here.
We evaluated mdbox against Maildir and we found that with these
setting dovecot 2 perfoms better than Maildir:
mdbox_rotate_interval = 1d
mdbox_rotate_size=60m
zlib_
Am 18.01.2012 13:44, schrieb Lee Standen:
> Hi Guys,
>
>
>
> I've been desperately trying to find some comparative performance
> information about the different mailbox formats supported by Dovecot in
> order to make an assessment on which format is right for our environment.
>
> This is a bra
Hi,
A small update: My Dovecot support company finally has web pages:
http://www.dovecot.fi/
We've also started providing 24/7 support.
Hi Guys,
I've been desperately trying to find some comparative performance
information about the different mailbox formats supported by Dovecot in
order to make an assessment on which format is right for our environment.
This is a brand new build, with customer mailboxes to be migrated in over
On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 14:41 -0800, Don Buchholz wrote:
> I've been having some problems with IMAP user connections to the Dovecot
> (v2.0.8) server. The following message is being logged.
>
> Jan 16 10:51:36 postal dovecot: master: Warning:
> service(imap-login): process_limit reached, c
On 11/06/2011 07:56 PM, Gordon Grubert wrote:
On 11/04/2011 08:43 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sat, 2011-10-22 at 21:21 +0200, Gordon Grubert wrote:
Hello,
our dovecot server crashes totally without any really useful
log messages. The error log can be found in the attachment.
The only way to ge
38 matches
Mail list logo
