On 3/5/2012 1:30 PM, Steve Campbell wrote:
I've been looking at some documentation on shared mail accounts.
But I'm getting mixed thoughts on how this can or should be done.
This brings up a question I have been meaning to ask.
One thing I want to do on my new converted system is to implement
I want to give multiple people shared access to some actual accounts
with all of the special use folders, with the following requirements:
I have done this (unsatisfactorarily) by making it a normal mail account
with normal login credentials. Add it like any other mail account. It
then
On 3/7/2012 6:32 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
5. No one other than a designated user or users (Master User(s)? Users
in a specified Group?) can delete any messages in this account, in any
of the folders.
If you are using ACLs, just don't give them the delete permission? But
I guess now that I
Hello Timo,
There seems to be something broken in v2.1 latest hg version:
# 2.1.1 (94de7605f50f)
1 namespace
* NAMESPACE (( /)(virtual/ /)) NIL NIL
* OK Namespace completed.
Please note that the OK Namespace completed. is send untagged.
It worked on below version:
# 2.1.1 (315f0d8cc2b2)
1
On 2012-03-07 1:04 PM, Willie Gillespie wgilles...@es2eng.com wrote:
On 3/7/2012 6:32 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
5. No one other than a designated user or users (Master User(s)? Users
in a specified Group?) can delete any messages in this account, in any
of the folders.
If you are using ACLs,
When a user makes a folder called 'x.y' it actually creates a folder
called 'x' with a folder called 'y' inside, rather than a folder called
'x.y'. I'm guessing this has to do with an internal folder separator
namespace configuration, but I'm a bit confused by how this works.
I'm using 2.0.15
On 03/07/2012 12:43 PM, Micah Anderson wrote:
When a user makes a folder called 'x.y' it actually creates a folder
called 'x' with a folder called 'y' inside, rather than a folder called
'x.y'. I'm guessing this has to do with an internal folder separator
namespace configuration, but I'm a bit
On 3/6/2012 3:01 PM, Steve Campbell wrote:
I've experienced that type of locked mailbox before on the old server.
Users insist on accessing their email account as a pop account on their
desktop with the check for new mail every so many minutes turned on
and still keep their smartphones on
On 3/6/2012 5:07 PM, Stephen Davies wrote:
Google tells me that these should go away but they don't.
Seems to happen continuously while a user is viewing email.
Is this thread what Google tells you?
http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2010-October/053909.html
Timo is the creator of Dovecot, if
Anybody also experiencing that imap processes are kept running/open by
mac osx mail.app, so eventually users are getting to the
mail_max_userip_connections limit?
Outlook / other clients seem to run fine.
Thanks,
Marc
I have read most of the doc on the dovecot website, and couldn't find any
info on the single instance storage feature, so I'm posting my questions
here.
- Are these 3 parameters the only one necessary for single instance
storage? I cannot find any doc on this feature on the website; is there
11 matches
Mail list logo