El 29/06/12 22:33, Daniel Parthey escribió:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sat, 2012-04-28 at 13:00 +0200, Daniel Parthey wrote:
we are experiencing similar sporadic data timeout issues with dovecot 2.0.20
as in http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2011-June/059807.html
at least once a week. Some
El 30/06/12 03:51, Daniel Parthey escribió:
Hi Angel,
Angel L. Mateo wrote:
I have a user, its assigned server is 155.54.211.164. The problem
is that I don't know why director sent him yesterday to a different
server, because my server was up all the time. Moreover, I'm using
poolmon in
On 2.7.2012, at 9.49, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
My problem was that this timeout seems to be counted from the beginning
of the LMTP connection, so when I have a lot of recipients in the same
connection, last ones sometimes timedout. I solved it increasing this timeout
with proxy_timeout
On 2.7.2012, at 10.10, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 2.7.2012, at 9.49, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
My problem was that this timeout seems to be counted from the beginning
of the LMTP connection, so when I have a lot of recipients in the same
connection, last ones sometimes timedout. I solved it
On 2.7.2012, at 9.53, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
I have a user, its assigned server is 155.54.211.164. The problem
is that I don't know why director sent him yesterday to a different
server, because my server was up all the time. Moreover, I'm using
poolmon in director servers to check
STATUS in Dovecot 2.1.7 returns the UTF-8 decoded folder name in a
string literal:
. CREATE INBOX.Euro IKw-
. OK Create completed.
. LIST INBOX.Euro IKw-
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) . INBOX.Euro IKw-
. STATUS INBOX.Euro IKw- (MESSAGES)
* STATUS {14}
INBOX.Euro € (MESSAGES 0)
. OK Status completed.
On 2.7.2012, at 12.07, Ewald Dieterich wrote:
STATUS in Dovecot 2.1.7 returns the UTF-8 decoded folder name in a
string literal:
. CREATE INBOX.Euro IKw-
. OK Create completed.
. LIST INBOX.Euro IKw-
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) . INBOX.Euro IKw-
. STATUS INBOX.Euro IKw- (MESSAGES)
* STATUS
El 02/07/12 09:13, Timo Sirainen escribió:
On 2.7.2012, at 10.10, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 2.7.2012, at 9.49, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
My problem was that this timeout seems to be counted from the beginning
of the LMTP connection, so when I have a lot of recipients in the same
On 2.7.2012, at 12.31, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
My problem was that this timeout seems to be counted from the beginning
of the LMTP connection, so when I have a lot of recipients in the same
connection, last ones sometimes timedout. I solved it increasing this
timeout with proxy_timeout
On 07/02/12 11:25, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 2.7.2012, at 12.07, Ewald Dieterich wrote:
STATUS in Dovecot 2.1.7 returns the UTF-8 decoded folder name in a
string literal:
. CREATE INBOX.Euro IKw-
. OK Create completed.
. LIST INBOX.Euro IKw-
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) . INBOX.Euro IKw-
.
On 2.7.2012, at 14.06, Ewald Dieterich wrote:
. CREATE INBOX.Euro IKw-
. OK Create completed.
. LIST INBOX.Euro IKw-
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) . INBOX.Euro IKw-
. STATUS INBOX.Euro IKw- (MESSAGES)
* STATUS {14}
INBOX.Euro € (MESSAGES 0)
. OK Status completed.
Is this intended?
On Mon, July 2, 2012 11:23 pm, Voytek Eymont wrote:
I have Dovecot/Postfix/MySQL/PostfixAdmin,
sorry, forgot to include conf setup:
doveconf -n
# 2.1.1: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 2.6.32-220.23.1.el6.x86_64 x86_64 CentOS release 6.2 (Final)
auth_cache_size = 1 k
auth_mechanisms =
Hi,
I use OpenBSD 5.1, roundcube 0.7.2 and dovecot 2.0.17
(684381041dc4+), mysql.
I get the following error when i try to connect
to imap :
roundcube: IMAP Error: Login failed for test...@mydomain.net
from 192.168.0.92. AUTHENTICATE PLAIN: Authentication failed. in
Hi all,
I mentioned this on the #dovecot irc channel, but I thought I would post
here so I can provide more details.
The basic problem is that when I upgraded from 2.1.4 to 2.1.7, some
users no longer are able to see their folders in pine/alpine. The
folders are actually there, and are
Hi,
though this is a bit of a side question, has anybody had an issue
while running Outlook 2010 with Dovecot?
The reason why I am asking is that I have setup a Dovecot 2.1.7 server
on FreeBSD which works fantastically with Thunderbird but Outlook
seems to be twice as slow in transferring
On 02/07/2012 15:34, Kaya Saman wrote:
Hi,
though this is a bit of a side question, has anybody had an issue
while running Outlook 2010 with Dovecot?
Yes, as far as being an IMAP client Outlook 2010 has not been any good
for me, slow, hangs, various non-intuitive issues...
Thunderbird
Il 02/07/2012 16:34, Kaya Saman ha scritto:
Hi,
though this is a bit of a side question, has anybody had an issue
while running Outlook 2010 with Dovecot?
The reason why I am asking is that I have setup a Dovecot 2.1.7 server
on FreeBSD which works fantastically with Thunderbird but Outlook
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Giles Coochey gi...@coochey.net wrote:
On 02/07/2012 15:34, Kaya Saman wrote:
Hi,
though this is a bit of a side question, has anybody had an issue
while running Outlook 2010 with Dovecot?
Yes, as far as being an IMAP client Outlook 2010 has not been any
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Mailing List SVR
li...@svrinformatica.it wrote:
Il 02/07/2012 16:34, Kaya Saman ha scritto:
Hi,
though this is a bit of a side question, has anybody had an issue
while running Outlook 2010 with Dovecot?
The reason why I am asking is that I have setup a
Am 02.07.2012 16:34, schrieb Kaya Saman:
Hi,
though this is a bit of a side question, has anybody had an issue
while running Outlook 2010 with Dovecot?
The reason why I am asking is that I have setup a Dovecot 2.1.7 server
on FreeBSD which works fantastically with Thunderbird but Outlook
On 02/07/2012 15:51, Kaya Saman wrote:
Hi Nicola,
there is no specific difference apart from seeing many of these errors:
Jun 26 15:10:11 imap(user): Error: Index
/mail/AD_Mail//user/Maildir/.Archive/dovecot.index: Lost log for
seq=2 offset=77008
Jun 26 15:10:11 imap(user): Warning: fscking
On 02/07/2012 16:02, Giles Coochey wrote:
On 02/07/2012 15:51, Kaya Saman wrote:
Hi Nicola,
there is no specific difference apart from seeing many of these errors:
Jun 26 15:10:11 imap(user): Error: Index
/mail/AD_Mail//user/Maildir/.Archive/dovecot.index: Lost log for
seq=2 offset=77008
Jun
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Giles Coochey gi...@coochey.net wrote:
On 02/07/2012 16:02, Giles Coochey wrote:
On 02/07/2012 15:51, Kaya Saman wrote:
Hi Nicola,
there is no specific difference apart from seeing many of these errors:
Jun 26 15:10:11 imap(user): Error: Index
On 02/07/2012 16:21, Kaya Saman wrote:
Or perhaps try
auth_cache_size = 1024
To cache authentications.
--
Regards,
Giles Coochey, CCNA, CCNAS
NetSecSpec Ltd
+44 (0) 7983 877438
http://www.coochey.net
http://www.netsecspec.co.uk
gi...@coochey.net
Thanks Giles :-)
I think that has made
On 02/07/2012 16:22, Giles Coochey wrote:
The size is in KB. I'm afraid cache-timeout and the inner workings
would be something only Timo or the Source Code know :-)
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Authentication/Caching
the TTL setting is in seconds - perhaps what you are looking for?
--
Regards,
though this is a bit of a side question, has anybody had an issue while
running Outlook 2010 with Dovecot?
No because i don't use that shit and enforce anyone not to do this.
Outlook is terrible and even worse with imap. It is not Dovecot fault and
have nothing to Dovecot.
Just replace
No, I'm saying you are trolling. A concat of RAID1 pairs has
reliability identical to RAID10.
not a concat but separate filesystem.
I prefer Alpine myself but try running that on Windows 7 (forced to at
work :-( ).
never needed but at least under windows XP it works fine.
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Giles Coochey gi...@coochey.net wrote:
On 02/07/2012 16:22, Giles Coochey wrote:
The size is in KB. I'm afraid cache-timeout and the inner workings
would be something only Timo or the Source Code know :-)
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Authentication/Caching
the
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
though this is a bit of a side question, has anybody had an issue while
running Outlook 2010 with Dovecot?
No because i don't use that shit and enforce anyone not to do this.
Outlook is terrible and even
On Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:00:07 +0200
Robert Schetterer articulated:
Am 02.07.2012 16:34, schrieb Kaya Saman:
Hi,
though this is a bit of a side question, has anybody had an issue
while running Outlook 2010 with Dovecot?
The reason why I am asking is that I have setup a Dovecot 2.1.7
On 2012-07-02 11:39 AM, Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
wrote:
though this is a bit of a side question, has anybody had an issue
while running Outlook 2010 with Dovecot?
No because i don't use that shit and enforce anyone not to do this.
Outlook is terrible and even worse with
Wojciech,
I believe you do recognize that this may be something that requires policy
changes to take effect.
Of course i do!
If you are not the one deciding with policy then state clearly that this
shit simply doesn't work, so if the policy is to use it, then the same
policy should state
Hi, must be your setup no Problems here with
Outlook 2010, sorry no time recent for analyse your posted config
I don't have any problems with it either. sounds like it could be a
networking problem. I have also heard on the Postfix list about some AV
programs causing problems.
If you don't
On 02/07/2012 16:54, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Wojciech,
I believe you do recognize that this may be something that requires
policy changes to take effect.
Of course i do!
If you are not the one deciding with policy then state clearly that
this shit simply doesn't work, so if the policy is to
On Jul 2, 2012, at 10:54 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Wojciech,
I believe you do recognize that this may be something that requires policy
changes to take effect.
Of course i do!
If you are not the one deciding with policy then state clearly that this shit
simply doesn't work, so if the
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
Hi, must be your setup no Problems here with
Outlook 2010, sorry no time recent for analyse your posted config
I don't have any problems with it either. sounds like it could be a
networking problem. I
No policy can override truth and facts.
I'm not going to comment other than say that this sub-thread probably needs
to continue on:
alt.flames.anti-microsoft.linux.jihad
no. no jihad. No linux actually (i don't use linux).
That's fact.
If someone want to use outlook then fine, but should
Speaking of truth and facts, you've had a lot of advice here lately for someone
who clearly has never worked on anything but toy projects with users that
you're free to bully into submission. If you don't have something useful to
contribute, why not just keep it to yourself?
If you show me
It's not funny at all, using certain references as you like doing. I don't
remember when I last heard such words on this list.
What do you fear?
On Jul 2, 2012, at 11:06 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Speaking of truth and facts, you've had a lot of advice here lately for
someone who clearly has never worked on anything but toy projects with users
that you're free to bully into submission. If you don't have something
useful to
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Giles Coochey gi...@coochey.net wrote:
On 02/07/2012 16:22, Giles Coochey wrote:
The size is in KB. I'm afraid cache-timeout and the inner workings
would be something only Timo or the Source Code know :-)
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Authentication/Caching
the
On 07/02/2012 12:06 PM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
No policy can override truth and facts.
I'm not going to comment other than say that this sub-thread probably
needs to continue on:
alt.flames.anti-microsoft.linux.jihad
no. no jihad. No linux actually (i don't use linux).
That's fact.
If
You're not necessarily wrong about Outlook vis-a-vis IMAP. You're very wrong
about how much power an email admin has in a real organization. Please take the
non-constructive flaming and cursing somewhere else, as others have suggested.
Still you can't improve trash program by better IMAP
Equivalents of all these can be presented the other way around against badly
configured free software solutions.
Fortunately not microsoft sets open standard and have to conform to them
or there will be microsoft only mail. And more fortunately not these
admins.
OK response from exchange
Am 02.07.2012 17:43, schrieb Kaya Saman:
Good but not good enough especially when some of our users have round
20GB of PST file :-(
please describe where is the relation between a pst file and imap
pst files are local
after all having 20 GB PST File is a user Problem ever, tell them to
split
On 2 July 2012 13:21, Robert Schetterer rob...@schetterer.org wrote:
Am 02.07.2012 17:43, schrieb Kaya Saman:
Good but not good enough especially when some of our users have round
20GB of PST file :-(
please describe where is the relation between a pst file and imap
pst files are local
Am 02.07.2012 19:10, schrieb Wojciech Puchar:
Equivalents of all these can be presented the other way around against
badly configured free software solutions.
Fortunately not microsoft sets open standard and have to conform to them
or there will be microsoft only mail. And more fortunately
See this this thread: http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2012-June/066374.html
Regards,
Pascal
--
The trapper recommends today: c01dcafe.1218...@localdomain.org
11.06.2012 13:23, Krzysztof Trybowski:
it is strange, but Dovecot 2.x still didn't make it into Debian (not
even backports).
It seems that 2.1.7 has landed in squeeze-backports.
--
Regards
mks
On Mon, 02 Jul 2012 11:54:07 -0400
Charles Marcus articulated:
On 2012-07-02 11:39 AM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
though this is a bit of a side question, has anybody had an issue
while running Outlook 2010 with Dovecot?
No because i don't use that shit and
On 02/07/2012 17:12, Kaya Saman wrote:
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Giles Coochey gi...@coochey.net wrote:
On 02/07/2012 16:22, Giles Coochey wrote:
The size is in KB. I'm afraid cache-timeout and the inner workings
would be something only Timo or the Source Code know :-)
On 2.7.2012, at 19.12, Kaya Saman wrote:
what's really weird is that if I keep increasing the Cache TTL and
Cache size, the speed of transfer starts dropping.
I think it may just be a coincidence that changing cache values appears to
help, and the real reason maybe being just that Dovecot got
On 2.7.2012, at 16.51, Dovecot user wrote:
imap-login: Aborted login (auth failed, 1 attempts): user=,
method=CRAM-MD5, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, TLS
Jul 2 15:19:13 mx
dovecot: auth-worker: mysql(localhost): Connected to database mail
Jul 2
15:19:15 mx dovecot: imap-login: Aborted login
On 30.6.2012, at 0.41, Zac Israel wrote:
# 2.0.19: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
..
passdb {
args = proxy=proxy_always nopassword=y host=172.16.0.13 port=143
proxy_timeout=5 starttls=y ssl=any-cert
v2.0 has some problems with this. You should use v2.1 and use server name as
the host value
On 29.6.2012, at 19.21, Daniel Parthey wrote:
Jun 29 15:40:31 10.129.3.249 dovecot: doveadm(use...@domain1.example.org):
Error: user use...@domain1.example.org: Error reading configuration:
net_connect_unix(/var/run/dovecot/config) failed: Permission denied
I've noticed a similar problem
On 28.6.2012, at 13.38, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
29413 root 1 760 22820K 9204K kqread 1 0:17 5.86%
indexer-worker
It runs as root while not really doing anything, but when it starts
accessing users' files it temporarily drops privileges. This is
necessary if users have
On 28.6.2012, at 2.34, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
I am continuing to attempt to set up dovecot to keep its mail store in maildir
form while receiving it from an mbox, but without success. Dovecot reports
the
error that it can't create the file ~/mail/.imap/INBOX (and also that it can't
chown
On 24.6.2012, at 13.21, ckubu wrote:
dovecot log entries:
Jun 23 23:19:10 mx dovecot: dict: Panic: file driver-pgsql.c: line 84
(driver_pgsql_set_state): assertion failed: (state == SQL_DB_STATE_BUSY || db-
cur_result == NULL)
This is clearly a bug, but I don't really see why it's
On 26.6.2012, at 21.55, Matthieu RAKOTOJAONA wrote:
I'm using the very good imaptest [0] tool to test my little imap server
implementation. I've tried to use the dovecot-crlf [1] file, but it looks like
there are some major issues :
$ grep -n In-Reply-To.*; tests/data/dovecot-crlf
On 26.6.2012, at 18.04, André Rodier wrote:
I am using LDAP lookups, and virtual users with the same UID/GID.
Everything was working fine before, but now, I have this error when I
try to send an email to a local account:
Jun 26
On 24.6.2012, at 23.37, Jürgen Pabel wrote:
I am implementing a plugin (for the pop3/imap process) that requires
some data to provided from the authentication phase (a derivative of the
password). For that, I have now implemented a passdb plugin that
generates this data and I would like to
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.8.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.8.tar.gz.sig
Most importantly fixes a pretty bad behavior of sending mailbox names as
UTF-8 instead of mUTF-7 as required by IMAP RFC. I'm surprised nobody
hadn't noticed this in v2.1.x tree before
There's no way to troubleshoot this error ?
I use the same config
file for dovecot 2.0.13, all works.
Perhaps in 2.0.17, something is
missing in my config file, or there's new keyword... ??
'dovecot -n'
give me :
auth_mechanisms = plain login digest-md5 cram-md5
apop
base_dir =
On 3.7.2012, at 7.37, Dovecot user wrote:
There's no way to troubleshoot this error ?
Set auth_debug_passwords=yes and show all of the log entries from a failed
login. Preferably use a test password so it won't be exposed. :)
I use the same config
file for dovecot 2.0.13, all works.
I tried to do the same 'dovecot -n' (dovecot 2.0.13, same config
file) :
# 2.0.13: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: OpenBSD 5.0 i386
ffs
auth_mechanisms = plain login digest-md5 cram-md5 apop
base_dir =
/var/dovecot/
default_internal_user = _dovecot
default_login_user =
_dovenull
first_valid_uid
On 3.7.2012, at 8.00, Dovecot user wrote:
I tried to do the same 'dovecot -n' (dovecot 2.0.13, same config
file) :
Oh, are you saying that the difference isn't just the Dovecot version, but that
they are completely different systems with (somewhat) different settings also?
That's much more
i just get this error :
dovecot: imap-login: Aborted login (auth
failed, 1 attempts): method=DIGEST-MD5, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1,
secured
root@mx:/var/log # date
IMAP Error: Login failed for
test...@mydomain.net from 192.168.0.92. Authentication failed. in
Hi all Dovecotters,
Lots of programs (e.g, PHP) link to a library called c-client, which is
a derivative of the original IMAP implementation, UW IMAP.
(For those new to UW IMAP, read here: http://www.washington.edu/imap/ )
UW IMAP is not in as much of active development as it used to be, so I
Outlook is the client of Exchange , it can do smtp,imap,pop3 too
its sold as a solution, with os , server, auth system ,client , support
people etc
and that solution - as a common example - doesn't work.
There is no reason for M$ to make Qutlook fit in a perfect
imap client cause this would
finally some clear answer :)
Trying dovecot to improve outlook is like using gold to improve shit.
No matter how much gold is used, it will still stink.
I cannot understand that people.
On Tue, 3 Jul 2012, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 2.7.2012, at 19.12, Kaya Saman wrote:
what's really weird is
Many companies require Outlook, and the fact is, as an EXCHANGE
client, Outlook works extremely well. I agree that as a standalone
Show me this.
I actually migrated many places OUT of this crap because it doesn't work,
with great success.
72 matches
Mail list logo
