On 3.7.2012, at 8.53, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
I see there is a dovecot shared library. I haven't looked into the
details, but here are things I'm interested in:
1. Replacing libc-client's use as a client library
..
I envision creating libdovecot-c-client-alike that is a set of headers
and
With auth_debug_passwords=yes you'll get a lot more in the log. If you don't
see, you're not looking into the correct file. Make sure you look into the
debug log as shown by doveadm log find.
On 3.7.2012, at 8.34, Dovecot user wrote:
i just get this error :
dovecot: imap-login: Aborted
On Tue, 3 Jul 2012, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 3.7.2012, at 8.53, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
I see there is a dovecot shared library. I haven't looked into the
details, but here are things I'm interested in:
1. Replacing libc-client's use as a client library
..
I envision creating
On 3.7.2012, at 9.18, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
I'm still not ready to give ABI or even API guarantees to libdovecot.. There
are still several important large changes to do and I don't really want to
keep a ton of ugly backwards compatibility stuff just for external users of
the library. Also
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 2.7.2012, at 19.12, Kaya Saman wrote:
what's really weird is that if I keep increasing the Cache TTL and
Cache size, the speed of transfer starts dropping.
I think it may just be a coincidence that changing cache values
On 3.7.2012, at 9.38, Kaya Saman wrote:
So if I look at a different authentication mechanism say LDAP would it
improve performance?
I doubt authentication has anything to do with why Outlook downloads mails
slowly.
But you could configure Outlook to use plaintext authentication instead of
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 3.7.2012, at 9.38, Kaya Saman wrote:
So if I look at a different authentication mechanism say LDAP would it
improve performance?
I doubt authentication has anything to do with why Outlook downloads mails
slowly.
But you
On 3 Jul 2012, at 07:46, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 3.7.2012, at 9.38, Kaya Saman wrote:
So if I look at a different authentication mechanism say LDAP would it
improve performance?
I doubt authentication has anything to do with why Outlook downloads mails
slowly.
But you could configure
Den 03.07.2012 08:58, skrev Kaya Saman:
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 3.7.2012, at 9.38, Kaya Saman wrote:
So if I look at a different authentication mechanism say LDAP would it
improve performance?
I doubt authentication has anything to do with why
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Arne K. Haaje a...@drlinux.no wrote:
Den 03.07.2012 08:58, skrev Kaya Saman:
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 3.7.2012, at 9.38, Kaya Saman wrote:
So if I look at a different authentication mechanism say LDAP would it
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 7:59 AM, J E Lyon
role.dovecot-read...@jlassocs.com wrote:
On 3 Jul 2012, at 07:46, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 3.7.2012, at 9.38, Kaya Saman wrote:
So if I look at a different authentication mechanism say LDAP would it
improve performance?
I doubt authentication has
On 3 Jul 2012, at 08:12, Kaya Saman wrote:
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 7:59 AM, J E Lyon
role.dovecot-read...@jlassocs.com wrote:
On 3 Jul 2012, at 07:46, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 3.7.2012, at 9.38, Kaya Saman wrote:
So if I look at a different authentication mechanism say LDAP would it
Hi there,
as I recall you are using OL2010 in an enterprise environment? In many
cases home directories etc. are residing then on network shares. And
that’s where .pst files and .ost files most probably are being written,
too. When profiles are being configured writing incoming mails to .pst
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Jahnke-Zumbusch, Dirk
dirk.jahnke-zumbu...@desy.de wrote:
Hi there,
as I recall you are using OL2010 in an enterprise environment? In many
cases home directories etc. are residing then on network shares. And
that’s where .pst files and .ost files most probably
Hello,
yesterday I set up a second director and even it works fine, some errors
occur in the logfile on the new director:
director: Error: Director 172.17.1.3:9090/left disconnected
director: Error: Director 172.17.1.3:9090/right disconnected
172.17.1.3 belongs to the first director which
On 2012-07-03 3:12 AM, Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com wrote:
However this is a clean server with plenty of space left on the pool
allocated for mail and it's additionally using ZFS too.
What OS? ZFS implementation/version? How is mail stored (maildir? mbox?)
While I don't think this is your
On 27/06/2012 10:25, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 18:35 +0100, Jase Thew wrote:
The reporting script at its core calls :
doveadm -f flow mailbox status -A -t 'messages vsize' '*'
It appears that Dovecot 2.1.7 is not resetting the vsize after collating
the sum total of
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Charles Marcus
cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 2012-07-03 3:12 AM, Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com wrote:
However this is a clean server with plenty of space left on the pool
allocated for mail and it's additionally using ZFS too.
What OS? ZFS
On 3 Jul 2012, at 11:51, Kaya Saman wrote:
Yeah, it seems to be M$ implementation of IMAP. I don't think that
there's anything anyone can do Outlook seems to wait after each
transmission (found using Wireshark).
Is the client syncing more than it has to? I mean, putting aside the delays
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:57 AM, J E Lyon
role.dovecot-read...@jlassocs.com wrote:
On 3 Jul 2012, at 11:51, Kaya Saman wrote:
Yeah, it seems to be M$ implementation of IMAP. I don't think that
there's anything anyone can do Outlook seems to wait after each
transmission (found using
Am 03.07.2012 13:00, schrieb Kaya Saman:
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:57 AM, J E Lyon
role.dovecot-read...@jlassocs.com wrote:
On 3 Jul 2012, at 11:51, Kaya Saman wrote:
Yeah, it seems to be M$ implementation of IMAP. I don't think that
there's anything anyone can do Outlook seems to wait
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Charles Marcus
cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 2012-07-03 3:12 AM, Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com wrote:
However this is a clean server with plenty of space left on the pool
allocated
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Robert Schetterer
rob...@schetterer.org wrote:
Am 03.07.2012 13:00, schrieb Kaya Saman:
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:57 AM, J E Lyon
role.dovecot-read...@jlassocs.com wrote:
On 3 Jul 2012, at 11:51, Kaya Saman wrote:
Yeah, it seems to be M$ implementation of
Am 03.07.2012 13:32, schrieb Kaya Saman:
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Charles Marcus
cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 2012-07-03 3:12 AM, Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com wrote:
However this is a clean server with
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Robert Schetterer
rob...@schetterer.org wrote:
Am 03.07.2012 13:32, schrieb Kaya Saman:
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Charles Marcus
cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 2012-07-03 3:12
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Robert Schetterer
rob...@schetterer.org wrote:
Am 03.07.2012 13:32, schrieb Kaya Saman:
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:37
On 3 Jul 2012, at 12:32, Kaya Saman wrote:
Ok now probably related to this is that some folders are not able to copy??
While dragging one folder from Outlook PST to the Dovecot IMAP server
in Outlook 2010, the transfer keeps bombing out?
In the logs all I see are:
: Error:
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 1:03 PM, J E Lyon
role.dovecot-read...@jlassocs.com wrote:
On 3 Jul 2012, at 12:32, Kaya Saman wrote:
Ok now probably related to this is that some folders are not able to copy??
While dragging one folder from Outlook PST to the Dovecot IMAP server
in Outlook 2010, the
[...]
That's not something as simple as permissions on the server end, is it?
I have my Maildir and parent folder permissions setup as:
rwx-- mail_user:mail_user
This should be ok shouldn't it or would I need to use rwxrwx- ??
By default it is created as stated at top of posting.
On 3 Jul 2012, at 13:11, Kaya Saman wrote:
It is Maildir I am using, checked permissions - they're all ok. Yeah
would be cur When connecting to this, do I need to put something
like Inbox or INBOX as the mail root folder?
I remember historically one needed to do that, however, with
On 3 Jul 2012, at 13:20, Kaya Saman wrote:
[...]
That's not something as simple as permissions on the server end, is it?
I have my Maildir and parent folder permissions setup as:
rwx-- mail_user:mail_user
I don't know what is strictly necessary, but I actually use rwxrws--- for
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 1:21 PM, J E Lyon
role.dovecot-read...@jlassocs.com wrote:
On 3 Jul 2012, at 13:11, Kaya Saman wrote:
It is Maildir I am using, checked permissions - they're all ok. Yeah
would be cur When connecting to this, do I need to put something
like Inbox or INBOX as the
On Tue, July 3, 2012 4:15 am, Pascal Volk wrote:
Oh, forget that tread. :)
I hope you are using Dovecot's lmtp, then set
lmtp_save_to_detail_mailbox = yes, in your 20-lmtp.conf. Otherwise pass use
the -m option with dovecot-lda (http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Tools/DovecotLDA)
Pascal,
thanks for
hallo,
dovecot log entries:
Jun 23 23:19:10 mx dovecot: dict: Panic: file driver-pgsql.c: line 84
(driver_pgsql_set_state): assertion failed: (state == SQL_DB_STATE_BUSY
|| db-
cur_result == NULL)
This is clearly a bug, but I don't really see why it's happening. It would
be
Hi all
I got a shiny new server and I want to install the latest and greatest of
everything on it. The old server has dovecot-1.2.17 working
with postfix-2.8.4,1, dovecot quotas, sieve etc.
My question is: Would it work of I installed dovecot 2 on this server along
with everything I want and just
35 matches
Mail list logo
