Hello all,
I'm using dovecot on CentOS 5.8 (official CentOS package) and have lot
of lock and sieve_execute_bytecode error in my dovecot.log.
$ cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 5.8 (Final)
$ dovecot --version
1.0.13
The sieve scripts are generated by squirrelmail mail and are mostly
El 07/09/12 12:28, Robert Schetterer escribió:
I have tried to activate it in one of my nodes. The problem is that
load of it has increase a lot, as much as the system was unusable
(maildir is in nfs storage, with indexes in local disks).
that might not be the optimal storage solution
Hi all
I hope anyone could help me out with my problem regarding the user_id
settings.
I am running my mail servers just for fun and I am not a professional mail
admin. After I am using postfix and dovecot for my mail servers with a mysql
backend for the last 2 years I have tried to set up
Op 9/14/2012 10:59 AM, Gregory Charot (EVENIUM) schreef:
Hello all,
I'm using dovecot on CentOS 5.8 (official CentOS package) and have lot
of lock and sieve_execute_bytecode error in my dovecot.log.
$ cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 5.8 (Final)
$ dovecot --version
1.0.13
Very,
On Tue 11 Sep 2012 05:33:10 PM GMT, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Any Content-Length header sent by IMAP client or via LDA input should
always get dropped (among some other headers) and replaced with the
correct value. So if there's a bug, I doubt it has anything to do with
that. But if you can easily
Thanks for the quick reply Stephan !
Is it possible to upgrade from 1.0.13 (which is the official CentOS
release) to the atrpms version 2.1.1-2 available at
http://packages.atrpms.net/dist/el5/dovecot/
Do I need a migration plan ?
Thanks !
Greg
Le 14/09/2012 11:48, Stephan Bosch a écrit :
Op 9/14/2012 1:03 PM, Gregory Charot (EVENIUM) schreef:
Thanks for the quick reply Stephan !
Is it possible to upgrade from 1.0.13 (which is the official CentOS
release) to the atrpms version 2.1.1-2 available at
http://packages.atrpms.net/dist/el5/dovecot/
Do I need a migration plan ?
Hello
I am using dovecot with POP3S and IMAPS ports,
When client
connect to POP3S port (995) , i can see in dovecot log file that the
protocol is TLSv1
So how come the protocol is TLSv1 and not SSL ?
Does the user connect t port 995 with SSL protocol then encrypt again
inside the SSL
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 01:37:31PM +0300, Robert JR wrote:
Hello
I am using dovecot with POP3S and IMAPS ports,
When client
connect to POP3S port (995) , i can see in dovecot log file that the
protocol is TLSv1
So how come the protocol is TLSv1 and not SSL ?
First of all, read
Am 14.09.2012 12:37, schrieb Robert JR:
Hello
I am using dovecot with POP3S and IMAPS ports,
When client
connect to POP3S port (995) , i can see in dovecot log file that the
protocol is TLSv1
So how come the protocol is TLSv1 and not SSL ?
because it is simply the same
read
Hi,
I was wondering what would be entailed in modifying dovecot 2.2 to
support storing mail in an object store. I've seen a few mails dotted
around in the ML history about supporting such a thing and seen it's
basically dependant upon some changes in lib-storage to support
writing messages
On 14.9.2012, at 17.46, Damien Churchill wrote:
I was wondering what would be entailed in modifying dovecot 2.2 to
support storing mail in an object store. I've seen a few mails dotted
around in the ML history about supporting such a thing and seen it's
basically dependant upon some changes
On 14 September 2012 15:59, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 14.9.2012, at 17.46, Damien Churchill wrote:
I was wondering what would be entailed in modifying dovecot 2.2 to
support storing mail in an object store. I've seen a few mails dotted
around in the ML history about supporting such
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 17:59 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I've a whole new design for it and I was planning on implementing it
for v2.2. Do you want to help coding it? :) Which storage would you
want to use?
The generic idea is:
- only one server accesses one user simultaneously
- index
14 matches
Mail list logo
