Thank you Timo!
Runs!
It is to late for configuring ... ;-))
Greetings,
Martin
Am 29.12.12 03:50, schrieb Martin Rabl:
Hi,
Am 29.12.12 03:47, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
No idea how that worked with your previous configuration (I guess
accidentally/unintentionally), but I guess you want this:
Hi,
Am 29.12.12 03:47, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
No idea how that worked with your previous configuration (I guess
accidentally/unintentionally), but I guess you want this:
that were the "bugfixes" ;-)
mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir:INBOX=~/Maildir/INBOX:LAYOUT=fs
Thank you, I give it a try
No idea how that worked with your previous configuration (I guess
accidentally/unintentionally), but I guess you want this:
mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir:INBOX=~/Maildir/INBOX:LAYOUT=fs
On 29.12.2012, at 4.41, Martin Rabl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> yesterday I did an update from dovecot 1.2 to 2.0.
Hi,
yesterday I did an update from dovecot 1.2 to 2.0.19 (Ubuntu 10.04 ->
12.04).
After fixing the configuration dovecot startups as it should, but with
one error, I don't understand: the INBOX will not be delivered to the
Mailclient and will not be filled by "deliver".
Instead, dovecot creat
Am 29.12.2012 02:40, schrieb Simon Brereton:
> On Dec 28, 2012 8:28 PM, wrote:
>>
>> I just install Dovecot and postfix. When I'm pull dovecot I see in the log
>> that its checking for mail. if a put a test message locally on the server
>> I can pull the message down to my cell phone and other c
On Dec 28, 2012 8:28 PM, wrote:
>
> I just install Dovecot and postfix. When I'm pull dovecot I see in the log
> that its checking for mail. if a put a test message locally on the server
> I can pull the message down to my cell phone and other computers. But when
> I try to a message from gmail or
I just install Dovecot and postfix. When I'm pull dovecot I see in the log
that its checking for mail. if a put a test message locally on the server
I can pull the message down to my cell phone and other computers. But when
I try to a message from gmail or aol it doesn't come in to the server.
it
Am 17.12.2012 08:31, schrieb Angel L. Mateo:
>> But we're having much more then >> 30 TB of maildata and doing an fsck
>> on huge partitions takes too much (down-) time for our mailsystem.
>>
> Wouldn't be easier just to split your users between different
> filesystems? I mean having differen
Am 15.12.2012 09:23, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:> On 12/15/2012 1:44 AM, Peer
Heinlein wrote:
>> But we're having much more then >> 30 TB of maildata and doing an fsck
>> on huge partitions takes too much (down-) time for our mailsystem.
>
> Peer are you using NFS or a cluster filesystem? Linux on th
Hi, we are currently moving our mailserver to a new server with Dovecot,
virtual users in LDAP, Passwords in Kerberos Setup. Everything works
fine except for GSSAPI which seems to be a bit buggy.
The thing is, that when using a .k5login [1] file it seems that SASL
does not get passed the home
Hello!
I use dovecot 2.1.12 locally on a 32bit Linux with an ext4 filesystem and after
deleting a lot of emails from a mbox folder, I now get the following messages
in the log:
dovecot: imap(amied): Panic: file mbox-sync.c: line 1351
(mbox_sync_handle_eof_updates): assertion failed: (offset ==
You can use multiple databases
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Authentication/MultipleDatabases
--
View this message in context:
http://dovecot.2317879.n4.nabble.com/Help-Regarding-Multiple-Base-DN-tp39422p39423.html
Sent from the Dovecot mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Just checked the Variables documentation
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Variables, which says:
%D - return "sub.domain.org" as "sub,dc=domain,dc=org" (for LDAP queries)
so it seems* you should be able to use "base = %D"
[*] assuming the wiki meant to say "dc=sub,dc=domain,dc=org"
-jf
Don't know if having multiple Base DNs can work, but you can use
%variables in it. We use this one to be able to have a simple onelevel
scope on all lookups:
base = ou=people,o=%d,o=ISP,o=example,c=com
scope = onelevel
-jf
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 2:02 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> The new v2.1 director code can handle running with old v2.1 directors (there
> were some protocol changes that improve things). I think v2.0 director is
> protocol compatible with the old v2.1 directors, so I think in theory it
> should
15 matches
Mail list logo