On 01/16/2013 12:17 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>> NOTE: The squat code is quite slow for large mailboxes. There are also a
>>> few bugs that are unlikely to be fixed. In v2.1+ it's recommended to use
>>> fts-lucene instead.
>>
>> I'm running 2.1 and have just set up fts_solr. Should I scrap that
>
Hi,
I'm running dovecot 1.2.15, on Debian squeeze. /var/mail is owned by
group "mail" with permissions "g+rwxs,o=". The mail_privileged_group
setting is set to "mail".
I am trying to access mail on a remote machine with mutt by tunnelling
mutt though ssh and running `dovecot --exec-mail imap` o
On 15.1.2013, at 21.05, Dave McGuire wrote:
> On 01/15/2013 01:51 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> NOTE: The squat code is quite slow for large mailboxes. There are also a
>> few bugs that are unlikely to be fixed. In v2.1+ it's recommended to use
>> fts-lucene instead.
>
> I'm running 2.1 and have
On 01/15/2013 01:51 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> NOTE: The squat code is quite slow for large mailboxes. There are also a
> few bugs that are unlikely to be fixed. In v2.1+ it's recommended to use
> fts-lucene instead.
I'm running 2.1 and have just set up fts_solr. Should I scrap that
and move to
Hello!
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-01-10 at 16:45 +0100, Andreas Meyer wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > We drive mboxes and maildirs and the dovecot-server is running very well and
> > everthing is fine, but I get the following warning in the
> > dovecot-lda-errors.log
> > when a mail is deli
Hallo
Im trying to set up an Postfix and Dovecot mailserver with ActiveDirectory
interation.
Postfix is doing well and even Dovecot does ... but I have one big problem!
My AD Accounts ar stored in two Subfolders
ou=Bischoff Benutzer LTT, dc=bischoff-ltt, dc=local
ou=Bischoff Benutzer Nbg,
