Am 12.07.2013 07:27, schrieb Andreas Oster:
Hi all,
I have run into a problem which I cannot find a solution for.
I have created an additional private namespace with the following
commands in dovecot.conf :
namespace {
disabled = no
hidden = no
ignore_on_failure = no
inbox =
Am 12.07.2013 08:39, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
Am 12.07.2013 07:27, schrieb Andreas Oster:
Hi all,
I have run into a problem which I cannot find a solution for.
I have created an additional private namespace with the following
commands in dovecot.conf :
namespace {
disabled = no
Am 12.07.2013 09:07, schrieb Andreas Oster:
Am 12.07.2013 08:39, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
Am 12.07.2013 07:27, schrieb Andreas Oster:
Hi all,
I have run into a problem which I cannot find a solution for.
I have created an additional private namespace with the following
commands in
Am 12.07.2013 09:37, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
http://sys4.de/de/blog/2013/02/07/mailarchiv-mit-dovecot-und-postfix-sortiert-nach-datum-mailadressen-und-ein-ausgehend-unterordnern/
for ideas
like above a little bit different ( no postfix bcc archive feature and
sieve autosort, instead for
Am 12.07.2013 09:54, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
Am 12.07.2013 09:37, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
http://sys4.de/de/blog/2013/02/07/mailarchiv-mit-dovecot-und-postfix-sortiert-nach-datum-mailadressen-und-ein-ausgehend-unterordnern/
for ideas
like above a little bit different ( no postfix bcc
Am 12.07.2013 02:09, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
On 10.7.2013, at 23.47, Daniel Partheyd.part...@metaways.de wrote:
You're right, TCP connections don't seem to be a real problem here.
I confused it with the following messages, we get every few minutes in the
dovecot-director.log, but I'm not
Hello Gab,
well the most attractive feature of virtual users is ease of administration.
Adding a new domain and user is a matter of adding a couple of text lines
(if using simplest text-based user databases), mail users do not litter the
system user space, you do not expose system access to
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 08:51:47PM +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Timo Sirainen skrev den 2013-07-03 22:34:
If backend has login_trusted_networks pointing to directors, then the
IP gets forwarded to backends as well.
how does imap get ip from http ?
The webmail-server will use the HTTP
Hi all/Timo,
I was thinking about Thunderbirds ability to create Virtual folders
allowing you to have many different views of your messages...
The downside though, is you only see these in Thunderbird.
I know that dovecot supports server side virtual folders:
Hello List.
Currently I have configured the share of users through the LDAP query as
shown
#dovecot.conf
protocol imap {
mail_plugins = quota imap_quota
}
plugin {
quota = dirsize
}
userdb ldap {
args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap.conf
}
#dovecot-ldap.conf
auth_bind = yes
Hi,
On 12.7.2013, at 16.21, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
I know that dovecot supports server side virtual folders:
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/Virtual
But I'm wondering about the possibility to manage these from the client
side...
For example, would it be
Hi, there is a possibility in the future that I might have to support
multiple domain names(but using the same IP address). Postfix has something
called 'virtual mailboxes' to help handle this.
But I also noticed that dovecot has a setting auth_realms where I can
specify domains separated by a
Le 12 juil. 2013 à 01:44, Timo Sirainen a écrit :
[...]
Here: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/2be295a0b64f
Hello Timo,
I hope I'll have the opportunity to try it tomorrow.
In the meantime, thanks again for your care,
Axel
Hello,
While experimenting with the sqlite backend, I noticed a big vacuum wrt its use
for a quota dict.
This is thus an opportunity to share a solution I managed to devise after some
trials and errors and a (very quick and unscientific) look at the code.
And also the opportunity to ask the
14 matches
Mail list logo
