Re: [Dovecot] Sizing MTA servers

2014-01-17 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 1/17/2014 12:36 PM, Sven Hartge wrote: ... > http://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch-access_control_lists.html#SECTcontrols > > , > | control = cutthrough_delivery > | > | This option requests delivery be attempted while the item is being > | received. It is usable in th

[Dovecot] doveconf base_dir

2014-01-17 Thread Andreas Schulze
Hello, today I run the command "doveadm auth cache flush" for the first time. # doveadm auth cache flush doveadm(root): Error: userdb lookup: connect(/var/run/dovecotauth-master) failed: No such file or directory 0 cache entries flushed # base_dir was the only item contain 'run' and it did

Re: [Dovecot] Sizing MTA servers

2014-01-17 Thread Sven Hartge
Adrian Zaugg wrote: > Am 17.01.14 10:53 schrieb Stan Hoeppner: >> On 1/16/2014 6:56 PM, Murray Trainer wrote: >> MTA = disk. Always has always will. Disk throughput is always the >> critical factor for queue performance, and an MTA is little more than a >> queue. Which makes it surprising that

Re: [Dovecot] imap abort after upgrade from 2.2.4 to 2.2.7

2014-01-17 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 17.01.2014 18:52, schrieb Benny Pedersen: > Robert Schetterer skrev den 2014-01-17 18:47: > >> why you didnt upgrade to recent 2.2.10 version, the problem may allready get >> fixed there > > package maintainers are seldom ahead of realeases then i would call the maintainer names and ask him

Re: [Dovecot] imap abort after upgrade from 2.2.4 to 2.2.7

2014-01-17 Thread Benny Pedersen
Robert Schetterer skrev den 2014-01-17 18:47: why you didnt upgrade to recent 2.2.10 version, the problem may allready get fixed there package maintainers are seldom ahead of realeases

Re: [Dovecot] imap abort after upgrade from 2.2.4 to 2.2.7

2014-01-17 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 17.01.2014 18:38, schrieb morrison: > I used to use dovecot 2.2.4. I saw lots of warnings saying 'Extension header > update points outside header size'. > I upgraded to dovecot 2.2.7, based on the discussion in mail list why? current is 2.2.10 http://www.dovecot.org/download.html i don't get

Re: [Dovecot] imap abort after upgrade from 2.2.4 to 2.2.7

2014-01-17 Thread Robert Schetterer
Am 17.01.2014 18:38, schrieb morrison: > Hi, > > I used to use dovecot 2.2.4. I saw lots of warnings saying 'Extension header > update points outside header size'. > I upgraded to dovecot 2.2.7, based on the discussion in mail list. Now, I see > lots of imap aborts around: > > src/lib-index

[Dovecot] imap abort after upgrade from 2.2.4 to 2.2.7

2014-01-17 Thread morrison
Hi, I used to use dovecot 2.2.4. I saw lots of warnings saying 'Extension header update points outside header size'. I upgraded to dovecot 2.2.7, based on the discussion in mail list. Now, I see lots of imap aborts around: src/lib-index/mail-index-transaction-export.c:203: i_assert(u32

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot IMAP proxy for gmail IMAP server

2014-01-17 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 17.01.2014 18:09, schrieb CM Reddy: > I am experimenting to use Dovecot as an IMAP proxy to GMAIL server. I would > like configure my localhost as an Dovecot IMAP proxy and trying to access > my GMAIL using the Thunderbird email client. Please share the steps to > configure and access my mails

[Dovecot] Dovecot IMAP proxy for gmail IMAP server

2014-01-17 Thread CM Reddy
Hi All, I am experimenting to use Dovecot as an IMAP proxy to GMAIL server. I would like configure my localhost as an Dovecot IMAP proxy and trying to access my GMAIL using the Thunderbird email client. Please share the steps to configure and access my mails from GMAIL server. - Thanks CM Reddy

Re: [Dovecot] Use dovecot for enterprise

2014-01-17 Thread Robert Schetterer
Am 17.01.2014 16:19, schrieb ♥ NiNJA ♂: > Hi guys > I like to know is it possible to create Unlimited number of email accounts > with Unlimited Storage in each email ? > > Does anybody do it ? > Does dovecot good enough for having more than millions of users ? > > Thanks :-) > Storage is a diff

Re: [Dovecot] Use dovecot for enterprise

2014-01-17 Thread Jordan Cook
Hi, If you have enough resources to handle that many users then dovecot can manage it perfectly. Not sure about unlimited storage though, I've not seen unlimited hard drives for sale just yet :) - but you can have as much storage as you need Regards, Jordan Cook Sent from my iPhone > On 17

[Dovecot] Use dovecot for enterprise

2014-01-17 Thread ♥ NiNJA ♂
Hi guys I like to know is it possible to create Unlimited number of email accounts with Unlimited Storage in each email ? Does anybody do it ? Does dovecot good enough for having more than millions of users ? Thanks :-)

[Dovecot] Changing user specific configs one at a time using userdb text file to override defaults...

2014-01-17 Thread Charles Marcus
Hi all, Ok, I'm now interested in testing converting users one at a time to mdbox+SIS, but want to make sure I understand how to do this. It appears the best way - for smaller installations at least - is to just use a simple text file userdb to override the defaults, then once all of the user

Re: [Dovecot] Sizing MTA servers

2014-01-17 Thread Adrian Zaugg
Am 17.01.14 10:53 schrieb Stan Hoeppner: > On 1/16/2014 6:56 PM, Murray Trainer wrote: > MTA = disk. Always has always will. Disk throughput is always the > critical factor for queue performance, and an MTA is little more than a > queue. Which makes it surprising that so many people ignore dis

Re: [Dovecot] Sizing MTA servers

2014-01-17 Thread Frerich Raabe
On 2014-01-17 10:53, Stan Hoeppner wrote: On 1/16/2014 6:56 PM, Murray Trainer wrote: This is probably a bit off-topic but does anyone have any idea about sizing MTA servers. We have about 200,000 emails/hr incoming and outgoing. I am intending using Exim and Spamassassin on each MTA. How m

Re: [Dovecot] Sizing MTA servers

2014-01-17 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 1/16/2014 6:56 PM, Murray Trainer wrote: > This is probably a bit off-topic but does anyone have any idea about > sizing MTA servers. We have about 200,000 emails/hr incoming and > outgoing. I am intending using Exim and Spamassassin on each MTA. > How many servers using recent hardware wo