Re: [Dovecot] Is replication broken?

2014-04-03 Thread Steffen Kaiser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 2 Apr 2014, IT geek 31 wrote: To answer my own question, I have to edit my Postfix main.cf file with the following command: mailbox_command = /usr/pkg/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda -f $SENDER -a $RECIPIENT More info can be found here:

Re: [Dovecot] how to enable debugging in imapc

2014-04-03 Thread Teemu Huovila
On 04/02/2014 06:12 PM, Tobias Oetiker wrote: hmm that does not seem to get ./src/lib-imap-client/imapc-connection.c to talk more ... or is this not the part of the code that gets active when implementing an imap proxy with dovecot ? I do not know exactly what you are trying to do, but I

Re: [Dovecot] nfs flush/fsync config settings problem

2014-04-03 Thread Alessio Cecchi
Il 08/01/2014 09:23, Troton_admin ha scritto: Hi, I need to place a maildir storage on a NFS filesystem, so I set up the config like this: mmap_disable = yes mail_nfs_storage = yes mail_nfs_index = yes mail_fsync = always lock_method = dotlock (also tried fcntl - local lockd is running, no

Re: [Dovecot] Is replication broken?

2014-04-03 Thread IT geek 31
Honestly, for most setups I would recommend LMTP nowadays. I don't use Postfix, but that page looks good: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixDovecotLMTP You do not need to do anything special in postfix, if you use Dovecot's LDA or LMTP, when you change the storage backend. Most

[Dovecot] dovecot 2.2.10 fts_lucene: Failed to initialize backend

2014-04-03 Thread Benjamin Podszun
Hey there. Lurking most of the time here, currently I'm trying to make FTS work™

Re: [Dovecot] Is replication broken?

2014-04-03 Thread IT geek 31
Honestly, for most setups I would recommend LMTP nowadays. I don't use Postfix, but that page looks good: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixDovecotLMTP I followed the guide, but I received the following error: Apr 3 08:41:31 server1 postfix/lmtp[4084]: DE4321F83A: to=us...@test.com,

[Dovecot] dovecot 2.2.10 fts_lucene: Failed to initialize backend

2014-04-03 Thread Benjamin Podszun
Hey there. (Lesson to self: Don't try to be cute. Somehow a trademark sign breaks my setup and the rest of the mail is discarded? Sorry for the previous, incomplete post) Lurking most of the time here, currently I'm trying to make FTS work. As far as I understand [1], squat is deprecated,

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot 2.2.10 fts_lucene: Failed to initialize backend

2014-04-03 Thread Peter Chiochetti
Am 2014-04-03 11:18, schrieb Benjamin Podszun: My problem: The lucene backend isn't working, I get this error whenever I try to access it (be it doveadm fts or a search, triggering an index): # doveadm fts rescan -u d...@darklajid.de doveadm(d...@darklajid.de): Error: fts: Failed to initialize

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot 2.2.10 fts_lucene: Failed to initialize backend

2014-04-03 Thread Benjamin Podszun
On Thursday, April 3, 2014 11:28:17 AM CEST, Peter Chiochetti wrote: Am 2014-04-03 11:18, schrieb Benjamin Podszun: My problem: The lucene backend isn't working, I get this error whenever I try to access it (be it doveadm fts or a search, triggering an index): # doveadm fts rescan -u

Re: [Dovecot] Disable maildir indexing and dovecot-uidlist on LMTP/LDA delivery

2014-04-03 Thread Jouko Nikula
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 1:36 AM, Joseph Tam jtam.h...@gmail.com wrote: Jouko Nikula jonik...@gmail.com writes: Is there a way to use LMTP (or LDA) so that maildir index and dovecot-uidlist are not updated? My setup is such that mail delivery sees user's maildir as write only. This setup

[Dovecot] Sieve (randomly?) flagging messages as \\Seen \\Deleted

2014-04-03 Thread Emanuele Balla (aka Skull)
Hi, I'm trying to debug (without great results, so far) a very weird behaviour in my environment. Sorry if this came out in another form before, but I've not been able to find out anything resembling what I'm experiencing, so far... OS is a debian wheezy and dovecot is the version provided by

Re: [Dovecot] Disable maildir indexing and dovecot-uidlist on LMTP/LDA delivery

2014-04-03 Thread Alessio Cecchi
Il 02/04/2014 12:27, Jouko Nikula ha scritto: Hello all, Is there a way to use LMTP (or LDA) so that maildir index and dovecot-uidlist are not updated? My setup is such that mail delivery sees user's maildir as write only. This setup works well when using postfix for mail delivery, but when I

Re: [Dovecot] Sieve (randomly?) flagging messages as \\Seen \\Deleted

2014-04-03 Thread Steffen Kaiser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 3 Apr 2014, Emanuele Balla (aka Skull) wrote: I'm trying to debug (without great results, so far) a very weird behaviour in my environment. Did you tried with enabled mail_log plugin? - -- Steffen Kaiser -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

[Dovecot] mdbox with mail_attachment_dir per user in 2.2.12

2014-04-03 Thread Pavel Stano
Hello, we have 2 netapp arrays with 2 volumes and we need to store our mail data in one or other volume for every user. We want keep data for one user in one volume only. So we would like to have 2 separate mail_attachment_dir, one on every volume. But in latest version 2.2.12 it look like it is

Re: [Dovecot] Sieve (randomly?) flagging messages as \\Seen \\Deleted

2014-04-03 Thread Emanuele Balla (aka Skull)
On 03/04/14 14:23, Steffen Kaiser wrote: On Thu, 3 Apr 2014, Emanuele Balla (aka Skull) wrote: I'm trying to debug (without great results, so far) a very weird behaviour in my environment. Did you tried with enabled mail_log plugin? I didn't but I tried it now: as far as I

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot 2.2.10 fts_lucene: Failed to initialize backend

2014-04-03 Thread Benjamin Podszun
On Thursday, April 3, 2014 12:13:49 PM CEST, Benjamin Podszun wrote: On Thursday, April 3, 2014 11:28:17 AM CEST, Peter Chiochetti wrote: Am 2014-04-03 11:18, schrieb Benjamin Podszun: ... Sorry for replying to myself, but I'm truely stuck and maybe this makes more sense to one of you

Re: [Dovecot] Sieve (randomly?) flagging messages as \\Seen \\Deleted

2014-04-03 Thread Steffen Kaiser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 3 Apr 2014, Emanuele Balla (aka Skull) wrote: On 03/04/14 14:23, Steffen Kaiser wrote: On Thu, 3 Apr 2014, Emanuele Balla (aka Skull) wrote: I'm trying to debug (without great results, so far) a very weird behaviour in my environment.

[Dovecot] xz compression

2014-04-03 Thread T.B.
Hello Timo, I've successfully setup xz compression for my Dovecot installation using the version 2.2.12 from Debian unstable. Together with the activation of the Single Instance Attachment Storage, this reduced the mail storage utilization for 20 mail accounts by 74%. *My question:* (For

Re: [Dovecot] Disable maildir indexing and dovecot-uidlist on LMTP/LDA delivery

2014-04-03 Thread Joseph Tam
On Thu, 3 Apr 2014, Jouko Nikula wrote: I now used: mail_location = maildir:~/mail:INDEX=MEMORY:CONTROL=/var/mail/%d/ctrl/%u and for sieve: plugin { sieve = /var/mail/%d/ctrl/%u/dovecot.sieve sieve_dir = /var/mail/%d/ctrl/%u/ } I also have two dovecot instances. One is responsible for

Re: [Dovecot] xz compression

2014-04-03 Thread Javier Miguel Rodríguez
El 03/04/2014 16:28, T.B. escribió: Hello Timo, I've successfully setup xz compression for my Dovecot installation using the version 2.2.12 from Debian unstable. Read the man page of xz(1) . With -9 compression level 674 MiB of ram are needed. If you use dovecot+xz, you really need to