Hi Steffan,
Solved! Thank you very much for you help. I think there was a
configuration error and when I used the "separator" keyword was not working
properly. Yesterday night, I tried again, and everything worked :-)
Regards!
Felix
On Wednesday 06 August 2014 08:02:38
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 5 Aug 2014, Felix Rubio Dalmau wrote:
but I have not set-up any namespace separator, so I understand that all
namespaces use the default one, right? :-S
Post your doveconf -n, then.
Do you think I should better use the
Hi all,
I have (I think) migrated my dovecot mail format from maildir to mdbox.
I have changed in 10-mail.conf the format from maildir to mdbox, and I have
executed this command for all my users:
dsync -u u...@domain.org mirror maildir:/mnt/vmail/domain/user
The only ou
On -10.01.-28163 20:59, Greg Sullivan wrote:
> I must say I am extremely disappointed that intra-account moves are not
> atomic. As far as I can tell, IMAP was designed to allow shared access, so
> in my opinion this operation should be atomic. Heaven FORBID that I should
> ask for entire conversa
That's promising that it should be doable. (yes, all I want is for the move
to only occur once - duplicate messages is not a "move" at all) I'll
forward your suggestions to the Thunderbird & Postbox teams.
In the meantime I'll continue to evaluate helpdesk systems and
"collaborative inbox" produc
Note that MOVE isn't atomic even between moving within one user's folders. The
MOVE RFC itself also doesn't say anything about it ever having to be atomic.
Although if by atomicity you mean that you simply want to make sure that the
same source mail can't be MOVEd twice, that would be doable wit
Hi,
I am not sure its intended or a fault in the newest Dovecot versions. I
have been using Dovecot v1.2.15 on Debian squeeze and FTS is working as
expected. When I search a quoted string "very good", I get 107 results
including plain and HTML emails which have this phrase.
In order to compare th
Hi!
I recently setup a second with replication to the other. Both machines
run ubuntu 12.04 with dovecot 2.2.13 (6bb26098a45c).
All users mail accounts are currently synced manually to the first
(mb1) using a dsync script, they are synchronised from a cyrus imap
server. Users are still loggi
Hello,
In attached file you will find patch for mail_log plugin to output
local, remote ip addresses. It may be usefull for somebody.
To enable support for dovecot 2.2.x versions change the line 'include
"net.h"' instead of 'include "network.h"'.
Thank you.
P.S. Sorry, for previous empty messa
--
With Best Regards,
Vitaliy T.
Hey Timo and all,
may I PING this subject once again to maybe get Timo's opinion.
On 23.07.2014 11:26, Christian Rohmann wrote:
> Bounced / rejected messages for something that will be usually be
> resolved very quickly and the messages can then be delivered after all
> is just not very nice for
Thanks Timo, and no, I can't (easily) change the code of the client.
I must say I am extremely disappointed that intra-account moves are not
atomic. As far as I can tell, IMAP was designed to allow shared access, so
in my opinion this operation should be atomic. Heaven FORBID that I should
ask fo
Hi Steffen,
but I have not set-up any namespace separator, so I understand that all
namespaces use the default one, right? :-S
Do you think I should better use the next command?
dsync -u "u...@domain.org" mirror
maildir:/mnt/vmail/domain.org/user:LAYOUT=fs
Feli
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 5 Aug 2014, Felix Rubio Dalmau wrote:
But it replies this answer, that I do not understand:
dsync(u...@domain.org): Error: Mail locations must use the same
virtual mailbox hierarchy separator (specify separator for
Hi everybody,
I have a virtual user setup that is using maildir, and I'd like to
migrate it to mdbox. Following directions from
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Migration/MailFormat
and keeping in mind that my maildir is in maildir:/mnt/vmail/%d/%u,
after having updat
Am 2014-08-05 04:01, schrieb Stephan Bosch:
>
>> Yesterday's routine upgrade to version 2:2.2.13-1~auto+130 (or some
>> other upgrade that came along from Debian?) introduced a problem with
>> mail delivery, which I was able to track down to a crash of dovecot-lda.
>
> Yes, my bad. I hadn't actua
Ok! Thank you!
Felix
On Tuesday 05 August 2014 10:25:23 Urban Loesch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> you can try the ALT Storage.
>
> http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/dbox
>
> Scroll down to "Alternate storage".
>
> Regards,
> Urban
>
> Am 05.08.2014 10:04, schrieb Felix Rubio Dalmau:
> > Hi everybody
Hi,
you can try the ALT Storage.
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/dbox
Scroll down to "Alternate storage".
Regards,
Urban
Am 05.08.2014 10:04, schrieb Felix Rubio Dalmau:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I have a running postfix+dovecot installation, running flawlessly. The
> machine this set
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 11:31:42PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> namespace private {
> separator = .
> prefix = Mail.
> inbox = yes
> }
ps - Will simply making the Mail. namespace "hidden" fix the problem,
while keeping things backwards compatible for clients who have the
prefix set to Mail
Hi everybody,
I have a running postfix+dovecot installation, running flawlessly. The
machine this setup is running onto has 2 mirrored SSD disks (in which dovecot
stores the mails) and 2 mirrored regular HD. I'd like to keep the fresh emails
in the SSD, and move them to an Archive folde
20 matches
Mail list logo
