Hi.
doveadm -D fetch -u login \
'imap.envelope imap.bodystructure size.virtual date.received' '*'
according to mail archives allows to regenerate indexes and precache specified
headers for imap usage.
What headers are needed for dovecot pop3 daemon?
I have one server where dovecot works
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Murray Trainer wrote:
rest then start failing with exit code 19200. I tried redirecting
See perldoc -f system, 19200 is exit code 75. 75 most likly means
Temporary failure.
STDERR but showed nothing. I suspect the cron
Hi again,
We have our mailboxes on several NFS filesystems mounted with the
options below.
10.11.0.238:/mailbox_store_01 on /home1 type nfs4
(rw,noatime,vers=4.0,rsize=65536,wsize=65536,namlen=255,hard,nordirplus,proto=tcp,port=0,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,clientaddr=10.11.0.95,local_lock=n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Chris wrote:
can I expose Dovecot's Manage Sieve port to the internet or
it is as secure as IMAP or POP3
People may use STARTTLS to encrypt their session and password.
- --
Steffen Kaiser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Versi
Hi All,
I am synchronizing a few hundred dovecot mailboxes with a perl script
via a crontab. It works for a while (ie exit status=0) but the
rest then start failing with exit code 19200. I tried redirecting
STDERR but showed nothing. I suspect the cron job is hitting some
sort of resource l
On 08/17/2014 10:45 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
I have a postfix+dovecot-2.2.13 system and have configured it to support
IMAPS on 993 with SSL/TLS. I'm noticing with users using Thunderbird, the
autodetect defaults to IMAPS on 143 with STARTTLS.
Which is preferred? Which is more secure? Which is more c
Dear All,
can I expose Dovecot's Manage Sieve port to the internet or should I
restrict access (e.g. by IP address or VPN)?
--
Christian
Hi,
I have a postfix+dovecot-2.2.13 system and have configured it to support
IMAPS on 993 with SSL/TLS. I'm noticing with users using Thunderbird, the
autodetect defaults to IMAPS on 143 with STARTTLS.
Which is preferred? Which is more secure? Which is more common?
Why would someone choose one o
On 15 Aug 2014, at 21:53, Ben Johnson wrote:
> # gdb /usr/lib/dovecot/imap /var/vmail/example.com/user/core
> Reading symbols from /usr/lib/dovecot/imap...(no debugging symbols
> found)...done.
> [New LWP 27866]
> [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
> Using host libthread_db library "/l
Hi,
the dovecot antispam plugin crahses here on a nullpointer dereference in
antispam_copy() at mailbox.c
The crash tracks back to a call of
antispam_classify_copy(asms->box_class, asmb->box_class)
At that point in time asmb is set to 0x0, causing the process to crash
with SIGSEGV.
Regards,
Tho
* Thomas Leuxner 2014.08.17 12:58:
> While flagged messages inside the mailbox still show up, messages flagged in
> 'Public' are not picked up anymore.
The 'Public' messages actually show up again if you toggle their flag off/on in
the mail client...
signature.asc
Description: Digital signat
The latest changes to the virtual plugin seem to have a negative effect on name
space rules:
$ cat dovecot-virtual
*
Public/*
flagged
While flagged messages inside the mailbox still show up, messages flagged in
'Public' are not picked up anymore.
Regards
Thomas
signature.asc
Description:
Hi,
I am having the same issue as:
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2014-April/095681.html
although I am using the latest dovecot-core and dovecot-lucene packages
from the debian sid repo which already has the patch
(http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/5e42a8c18b51) mentioned in the
abo
13 matches
Mail list logo