Am 24.11.2014 um 00:35 schrieb Bertrand Caplet:
>> Well, since this was a secure connection test, needed openssl for the
>> connect, not telnet. And how to do that on Windows? I DID try it on
>> this F20 notebook, and of course it worked just fine. That was why I
>> really suspected Windows TLS
On 11/23/2014 06:37 PM, Bertrand Caplet wrote:
Hey Robert,
There is a command on linux to test ssl/tls smtp server :
openssl s_client -connect mail.example.com:port -starttls smtp
You just need openssl for windows here :
http://slproweb.com/products/Win32OpenSSL.html
Let me know if this is wor
On 11/23/2014 06:35 PM, Bertrand Caplet wrote:
Well, since this was a secure connection test, needed openssl for the
connect, not telnet. And how to do that on Windows? I DID try it on
this F20 notebook, and of course it worked just fine. That was why I
really suspected Windows TLS functions.
> Hey Robert,
> There is a command on linux to test ssl/tls smtp server :
> openssl s_client -connect mail.example.com:port -starttls smtp
>
> You just need openssl for windows here :
> http://slproweb.com/products/Win32OpenSSL.html
>
> Let me know if this is working.
> Regards
>
By the way if t
> Well, since this was a secure connection test, needed openssl for the
> connect, not telnet. And how to do that on Windows? I DID try it on
> this F20 notebook, and of course it worked just fine. That was why I
> really suspected Windows TLS functions. Then when I was trying again, I
> caught
> i guess best way is upgrade to latest patch level and retest
> anything in verbose log ?
>
Thanks Robert,
actually the configuration wasn't the same on both servers. One had
mail_plugins = quota notify replication on top of the configuration
(10-mail.conf) which is right.
And the other had mai
On 11/23/2014 05:59 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 23.11.2014 um 23:30 schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
On 11/23/2014 04:45 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 23.11.2014 um 22:33 schrieb Reindl Harald:
no idea what you are talking about
K9 is a android client and works fine with TLS
no idea what has "h
Am 23.11.2014 um 23:30 schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
On 11/23/2014 04:45 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 23.11.2014 um 22:33 schrieb Reindl Harald:
no idea what you are talking about
K9 is a android client and works fine with TLS
no idea what has "https" to do with email nor why someone needs to
On 11/23/2014 04:45 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 23.11.2014 um 22:33 schrieb Reindl Harald:
no idea what you are talking about
K9 is a android client and works fine with TLS
no idea what has "https" to do with email nor why someone needs to
"disable K9 long enugh" whatever "long enough" is
On 11/23/2014 04:33 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
no idea what you are talking about
K9 is a android client and works fine with TLS
K9 for Redcoat is a 'nanny' watcher for Windows. It protects the home
computer from all sorts of nastiness on the Internet. Very popular in
my community. I do no
Am 23.11.2014 um 22:33 schrieb Reindl Harald:
> no idea what you are talking about
>
> K9 is a android client and works fine with TLS
>
> no idea what has "https" to do with email nor why someone needs to
> "disable K9 long enugh" whatever "long enough" is - don't get me wrong
> but most technica
Am 23.11.2014 um 22:23 schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
> I finally noticed this popup of K9 blocking https on port (143, 993,
> 995). So the user has to come back over here and disable K9 long enough
> to get things working.
>
> ARGH!
shit happens
however you may compare your settings with i.e
https
Am 23.11.2014 um 22:08 schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
OK, I did not know that this user has a new computer with Outlook 2010.
This SHOULD make it easier but...
I have the computer right next to me, they brought it over. It is on
the same LAN as this notebook. I can access my server with:
openssl
no idea what you are talking about
K9 is a android client and works fine with TLS
no idea what has "https" to do with email nor why someone needs to
"disable K9 long enugh" whatever "long enough" is - don't get me wrong
but most technical context on several lists of you if it comes to
details
I finally noticed this popup of K9 blocking https on port (143, 993,
995). So the user has to come back over here and disable K9 long enough
to get things working.
ARGH!
On 11/23/2014 04:08 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
OK, I did not know that this user has a new computer with Outlook
2010. T
Am 23.11.2014 um 21:50 schrieb Bertrand Caplet:
> Hi,
> I know there are lots of questions about replication, but I searched and
> didn't find my question.
> I've got some problems with syncing. I've got 2 servers: A and B
> When a email arrives on server A sometimes it's not syncing in server B
>
OK, I did not know that this user has a new computer with Outlook 2010.
This SHOULD make it easier but...
I have the computer right next to me, they brought it over. It is on
the same LAN as this notebook. I can access my server with:
openssl s_client -connect z9m9z.htt-consult.com:995
An
Hi,
I know there are lots of questions about replication, but I searched and
didn't find my question.
I've got some problems with syncing. I've got 2 servers: A and B
When a email arrives on server A sometimes it's not syncing in server B
I think server A doesn't always notify server B there are n
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 12:38:02PM +0100, Matthias Egger wrote:
> Has someone of you just found any kind of solution to this problem?
We have been running some days with patches 31262a892ba7 and 80ed82a93c1a
from http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/
They are working fine, handling the previously pa
Am 23.11.2014 um 17:14 schrieb Rajesh M.:
> hi
>
> i am using dovecot for pop3 and imap along with qmail toaster
>
> i had recently changed over from a 32 bit system to a 64 bit system.
>
> i use squirrelmail.
>
> the issue i face is that when the user inserts an invalid password then the
> me
hi
i am using dovecot for pop3 and imap along with qmail toaster
i had recently changed over from a 32 bit system to a 64 bit system.
i use squirrelmail.
the issue i face is that when the user inserts an invalid password then the
message he gets is connection dropped by imap server (instead o
Hi,
Am 22.11.2014 um 16:56 schrieb Hanns Mattes:
> My idea is to switch off Server B, make the necessary config-changes,
> delete all user maildirs, restart the server an let replication do it's
> work. After that (and correcting the sieve-rules of the users if
> necessary), I'd stop server A, de
Am 23.11.2014 um 03:17 schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
>
> On 11/22/2014 01:17 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Am 21.11.2014 um 22:29 schrieb Reindl Harald:
>>> Am 21.11.2014 um 22:24 schrieb Robert Schetterer:
Am 21.11.2014 um 20:59 schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
> I have one user that uses Outlook
23 matches
Mail list logo
