Hello,
I am running a dovecot and proxy server on two different virtual machines and
on the dovecot proxy server I see around 5-6 times per day the following
warning:
Feb 03 16:15:12 auth: Warning:
proxy(em...@domain.com,xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx,): DNS lookup for
mailboxserver.domain.com took 1.550 s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, ML mail wrote:
I am running a dovecot and proxy server on two different virtual machines and
on the dovecot proxy server I see around 5-6 times per day the following
warning:
Feb 03 16:15:12 auth: Warning:
proxy(em...@domain.
On 03 Feb 2015, at 23:49 , Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> What mail storage are you using? With Maildir all messages are plain files,
> you could move those messages into a specific folder and do:
>
> find /path/to/folder -mtime +$days -print0 | \
> xargs -r0 mv -t /path/to/INBOX/new
That’s simple eno
The default connection limit values of dovecot are pathetic - unless
you run a home mail server where there is only you, the cat and the
dog using it.
OP, lots of editing with trial and error required.
from memory massive increases needed to:
service auth -> client limit
service imap-login ->
On 04 Feb 2015, at 03:38 , ML mail wrote:
> I am running a dovecot and proxy server on two different virtual machines and
> on the dovecot proxy server I see around 5-6 times per day the following
> warning:
>
> Feb 03 16:15:12 auth: Warning:
> proxy(em...@domain.com,xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx,): DNS loo
Thanks for your comments. I understand as DNS uses UDP that there could be some
DNS queries which might get lost if the CPU or network is too busy but the
thing is that this server is not so busy really. It has 2 cores with 4 GB of
RAM and the CPU averages to 2% usage. The network averages to 1
I'm seeing two bogus messages appearing my Maildir/cur directory.
They're dovecot.index.log and dovecot-uidlist.
-rw--- 1 gsexton users 51 Feb 4 09:04 Maildir/cur/dovecot-uidlist:2,S
-rw--- 1 gsexton users 244 Feb 4 09:04 Maildir/cur/dovecot.index.log
These files are only appearing i
how do you come to the conclusion that it matters how busy "this server
is"? jesus christ you are asking *remote servers* for their answers and
the request as well the answer passes different routers, ISP's and
likely a *chain of forwarders* until you don't recursion at your own and
even if you
Am 04.02.2015 um 07:49 schrieb Steffen Kaiser:
> On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, Thomas Güttler wrote:
>
>> I would like to implement a 43Folder system[1] with dovecot and a mail user
>> agent.
>
>> Use case:
>
>> - I have a new mail in my inbox. I read it and see that I can't handle it
>> now. I want to
ML mail writes:
I am not running a local DNS cache on the server. As suggested using a
local DNS cache would simply fix this issue but I am more interested to
know what is generating these slow DNS queries...
As another poster has commented, a slow DNS response may not be anything
related to
Hi,
I'm studying an issue related to mdbox and lazy_expunge. If it is active in the
imap configuration, when you delete a message (copy to new folder + expunge old
folder), a copy is also sent to the expunge namespace.
I realize that is something related to mdbox and
lazy_expunge_only_last_i
My fault here, I should have precised that the DNS query it tries to resolve is
simply the DNS name of my
mailbox server (mailboxserver.domain.com). So domain.com is hosted locally on
DNS servers on that very same network as the dovecot servers are located.
Furthermore all the resolvers I use i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, George Sexton wrote:
I'm seeing two bogus messages appearing my Maildir/cur directory. They're
dovecot.index.log and dovecot-uidlist.
-rw--- 1 gsexton users 51 Feb 4 09:04 Maildir/cur/dovecot-uidlist:2,S
-rw--- 1 gsex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, Thomas Güttler wrote:
Am 04.02.2015 um 07:49 schrieb Steffen Kaiser:
On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, Thomas Güttler wrote:
I would like to implement a 43Folder system[1] with dovecot and a mail user
agent.
Use case:
- I have a new m
14 matches
Mail list logo