Earlier, I asked:
>> I would like to be able to run some sort of periodic health check to
>> confirm that dsync is (or is not) running properly between the two
>> sites, and alert me if dsync is failing or lagging excessively. Does
>> anyone know of a tool to do this?
and Michael Grimm replied:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:32:42 +1000
Noel Butler wrote:
> On 13/03/2016 20:47, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> > On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 09:45:06 +
> > James wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/03/2016 15:17, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> >>
> >> > zfs set
On 13/03/2016 20:47, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 09:45:06 +
James wrote:
On 11/03/2016 15:17, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> zfs set sync=disabled ?
Only if you are happy to loose data on power failure.
I don't know the actual setup, but if
On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 11:47:23 +0100
Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 09:45:06 +
> James wrote:
>
> > On 11/03/2016 15:17, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> >
> > > zfs set sync=disabled ?
> >
> > Only if you are happy to loose data
On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 09:45:06 +
James wrote:
> On 11/03/2016 15:17, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
>
> > zfs set sync=disabled ?
>
> Only if you are happy to loose data on power failure.
I don't know the actual setup, but if you have no UPC you shouldn't host email
On 11/03/2016 15:17, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> zfs set sync=disabled ?
Only if you are happy to loose data on power failure.
On 11/03/2016 14:58, Juan Bernhard wrote:
Someone has experiences with ZFS and NFS(v3) in high load environments?
Thanks
Be careful to no do any synchronous writes under ZFS.
By default all NFS writes are synchronous but I assume dovcot sync
writes all data anyway so in this case the NFS