Can you provide doveconf -n?
---Aki TuomiDovecot oy
Original message From: Leander Schäfer
Date: 01/10/2016 03:41 (GMT+02:00) To: Aki Tuomi ,
Dovecot Mailing List , Timo Sirainen
Subject: Re: Bug: Shared Mailbox - Case Sensitivity
Am I missing something, or might this be
On 01/10/2016 08:27, Joseph Tam wrote:
we have a setup with (CentOS 6) Director+Dovecot, Maildir as storage
on
NetApp NFS v3. Every time I try to switch to NFS v4 I found issue with
lock (and others). So for me NFSv4 with Maildir is "unstable" or need
a
fine tuning that I don't know.
I foun
Am I missing something, or might this be a bug as it seems to me?
Am 16.09.16 um 14:21 schrieb Leander Schäfer:
Hi Aki,
Thanks for your advice. Yes, I'm aware of this. Yet lowercasing should
be the default since Dovecot 2.1.x., isn't it? Yet I wouldn't know
where exactly to implement this %
Any idea?
Am 17.09.16 um 00:44 schrieb Leander Schäfer:
Hi,
I'm trying to setup group based ACLs coming from OpenLDAP. My setup
doesn't require a POSIX Group match. In the Dovecot configuration file
I have this: "user_attrs = [...], mailAclGroups=acl_groups" as well as
"acl = vfile:/usr/loca
we have a setup with (CentOS 6) Director+Dovecot, Maildir as storage on
NetApp NFS v3. Every time I try to switch to NFS v4 I found issue with
lock (and others). So for me NFSv4 with Maildir is "unstable" or need a
fine tuning that I don't know.
I found the same thing, and turning off write dele
Hi!
With Dovecot Director and Proxy or the new (great!) TAG-feature from
Dovecot it's easy to set up a shared IMAP-Cluster with individual local
filesystems.
But I'm unsure if it's possible to build a setup where shared mailboxes
still can work.
If user A is on Cluster (1) and user B is on (2)
Dovecot version:2.2.25
Since we used to keep our email files on widows server, I made the following
changes in maildir-storage.h
#define MAILDIR_EXTRA_SEP ','
#define MAILDIR_INFO_SEP_S ":" to "+".
Everything seems working except EXPUNG, The dovecot log is flooded by
messages like fol
by SAS I meant SIAS (Single Instance Attachment Storage).
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 9:33 AM Webert de Souza Lima
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A couple of months ago I had a problem with Single Attachment Storage
> after infrastructure migration;
>
> All mailboxes were rsynced to another filesystem, and that m
Hi,
Has this slipped off the radar or is it somehow not suitable for inclusion?
Thanks,
Robert
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Robert Munteanu
wrote:
> (snip)
>
>> I have no issue in resending a new version of the patch with better
>> error reporting, will do so in the following days.
>>
>> R
Il 23/09/2016 14:31, Robert Blayzor ha scritto:
Recently moving to newer storage platforms for mailbox storage so looking at
moving mounts from NFSv3 with lots of issues with locking and caching to NFSv4.
There seems to be a lot of benefits to v4 along with some other new features,
namely “de
10 matches
Mail list logo