Re: doveadm index: can't index a different namespace?

I got solr working. I'll post more info later. On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote: > >> ah. Looking into Solr. Is the wiki out of date with regard to >> solr 6.2.0? there

Re: doveadm index: can't index a different namespace?

On 02 Nov 2016, at 22:02, Larry Rosenman wrote: > > why wouldn't it be able to use the ~/MAILARCHIVE/ filesystem space? > > The other indexes etc seem to get built there. It's not about adding an index there, but about trying to open "MAILARCHIVE" itself as a folder.

Re: Outlook 2010 woes

Am 2016-11-02 um 13:16 schrieb Konstantin Khomoutov: On Tue, 1 Nov 2016 18:20:14 -0500 Bryan Holloway wrote: The new (2.2) server had "auth_mechanisms" of "digest-md5" enabled along with "plain". This is what was causing the four-second delay, but only with Outlook clients.

Re: doveadm index: can't index a different namespace?

On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote: > ah. Looking into Solr. Is the wiki out of date with regard to > solr 6.2.0? there doesn't seem to be a conf/schmea.xml file any more. I started the default solr from FreeBSD ports, and there is no update URL. I'll

Re: doveadm index: can't index a different namespace?

On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote: > why wouldn't it be able to use the ~/MAILARCHIVE/ filesystem space? > > The other indexes etc seem to get built there. > > I'll see if the current FreeBSD solr port is easier to set up than the > last time I tried. >

Re: doveadm index: can't index a different namespace?

Is there anything else I can provide? On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote: > nope -- No difference > > thebighonker.lerctr.org ~ $ ls -l ~/MAILARCHIVE/ > total 176 > drwx-- 6 ler ler 7 May 25 2014 2004 > drwx-- 8 ler ler 8 Mar 3 2013

Re: No stats under FreeBSD 10.3

Thnx Larry, Thats was it! Ruud > On 2 Nov 2016, at 18:52, Larry Rosenman wrote: > > I added the following to 90-plugin.conf: > > service stats { > chroot = empty > client_limit = 0 > drop_priv_before_exec = no > executable = stats > extra_groups = >

Re: Dovecot 2 LDAP "unknown user"

I updated dovecot-ldap.conf.ext so that it now reads as below: #Custom Settings hosts = 192.168.153.143 dn = u...@domain.com dnpass = password auth_bind = yes auth_bind_userdn = %u...@domain.com ldap_version = 3 base = dc=rpservices,dc=com #user_filter = (&(objectclass=person)(mail=%u))

Re: Repeat e-mail syndrome shows up in 2.2.26+

On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 07:15:17PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 01 Nov 2016, at 18:26, The Doctor wrote: > > > > Getting complaints from people about pop/imap > > > > issues. > > > > some people are getting repaeted e-mail. > > > > Other are not able to delete

Re: doveadm index: can't index a different namespace?

nope -- No difference thebighonker.lerctr.org ~ $ ls -l ~/MAILARCHIVE/ total 176 drwx-- 6 ler ler 7 May 25 2014 2004 drwx-- 8 ler ler 8 Mar 3 2013 2005 drwx-- 11 ler ler 11 Mar 3 2013 2006 drwx-- 11 ler ler 11 May 3 2013 2007 drwx-- 14 ler ler 14 Mar

Re: doveadm index: can't index a different namespace?

It looks like fts-lucene wants to write some information into INBOX's index files. But your archive namespace doesn't have a working INBOX. Maybe it would work if you create "#ARCHIVE/inbox"? > On 02 Nov 2016, at 20:13, Larry Rosenman wrote: > > one other thing,

Re: doveadm index: can't index a different namespace?

one other thing, fts_autoindex does NOT appear to be working on the #ARCHIVE/ NAMESPACE. I wonder if these are all interrelated? On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote: > FWIW it DOES work on my default NAMESPACE, just not the #ARCHIVE/ > NAMESPACE. > > > On

Re: doveadm index: can't index a different namespace?

FWIW it DOES work on my default NAMESPACE, just not the #ARCHIVE/ NAMESPACE. On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote: > It's ALWAYS failed on the other NAMESPACE. > > Some of the logging looks weird as well for the 2nd namespace: > > Nov 2 12:32:03

Re: v2.2.26.0 released

On 02.11.2016 19:54, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2016-11-02, Aki Tuomi wrote: If the standard way works, I am happy to include the original patch I sent, amended so that it checks for presence of LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER. If they keep this promise, then we should have no

Re: v2.2.26.0 released

On 2016-11-02, Aki Tuomi wrote: > If the standard way works, I am happy to include the original patch I > sent, amended so that it checks for presence of LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER. > If they keep this promise, then we should have no worries about things > breaking up. Diff

Re: No stats under FreeBSD 10.3

I added the following to 90-plugin.conf: service stats { chroot = empty client_limit = 0 drop_priv_before_exec = no executable = stats extra_groups = fifo_listener stats-mail { group = mode = 0666 user = } fifo_listener stats-user { group = mode = 0666

Re: doveadm index: can't index a different namespace?

It's ALWAYS failed on the other NAMESPACE. Some of the logging looks weird as well for the 2nd namespace: Nov 2 12:32:03 thebighonker dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=, method=PLAIN, rip=207.231.91.36, lip=192.147.25.65, mpid=76712, TLS, session= Nov 2 12:32:03 thebighonker

Re: doveadm index: can't index a different namespace?

It's getting a bit strange. You were running 2.2.25 previously and it was working then? Does the doveadm index always fail with the same errors? Also I just noticed that it's saying INBOX isn't selectable: "lucene: Failed to sync mailbox INBOX: Mailbox isn't selectable". Which I guess isn't

Re: sieve sending vacation message from vm...@ns1.domain.tld

is there something more i need to be doing my end? On 25/10/2016 09:11, Matthew Broadhead wrote: are there any instructions or tests i can make to check the sieve configuration? or does the magic all happen internally and there are no settings to change? On 21/10/2016 10:22, Matthew

Re: doveadm index: can't index a different namespace?

thebighonker.lerctr.org ~ $ doveadm mailbox status -u l...@lerctr.org vsize \#ARCHIVE/2016/10/clamav-rules #ARCHIVE/2016/10/clamav-rules vsize=3840752 thebighonker.lerctr.org ~ $ On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 02 Nov 2016, at 19:19, Larry Rosenman

Re: doveadm index: can't index a different namespace?

On 02 Nov 2016, at 19:19, Larry Rosenman wrote: > > clamav-rules is NOT a directory, nor are any of the others: Can you access these mboxes at all with Dovecot? e.g. doveadm mailbox status -u user@domain clamav-rules > thebighonker.lerctr.org ~/MAILARCHIVE $ cd 2016/10 >

Re: doveadm index: can't index a different namespace?

clamav-rules is NOT a directory, nor are any of the others: thebighonker.lerctr.org ~/MAILARCHIVE $ cd 2016/10 thebighonker.lerctr.org ~/MAILARCHIVE/2016/10 $ ls -l total 72106 -rw-r--r-- 1 ler ler 440461 Nov 1 00:05 Amplify_Mail -rw-r--r-- 1 ler ler 104102478 Nov 1 14:53 INBOX

Re: No stats under FreeBSD 10.3

prw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel 0 Nov 1 13:09 stats-mail prw--- 1 root wheel 0 Nov 1 13:09 stats-user drwxr-x--- 2 root dovenull 4 Nov 1 13:09 token-login If something other than root is trying to write to stats-user, we found the issue. this is on 10.3-STABLE On Wed,

Re: doveadm index: can't index a different namespace?

On 01 Nov 2016, at 20:30, Larry Rosenman wrote: > > doveadm -D -vv index \#ARCHIVE/\* garners the below for ALL mailboxes > in the > namespace: > doveadm(ler): Error: Mailbox #ARCHIVE/2013/04/clamav-rules: Status lookup > failed: Internal error occurred. Refer to server

Re: Repeat e-mail syndrome shows up in 2.2.26+

On 01 Nov 2016, at 18:26, The Doctor wrote: > > Getting complaints from people about pop/imap > > issues. > > some people are getting repaeted e-mail. > > Other are not able to delete their e-mails from an IMAP lcient. Anything in error logs? POP3 duplicates sound

Re: No stats under FreeBSD 10.3

On 01 Nov 2016, at 22:31, Ruud Boon wrote: > > HI, > > I’m currently testing the stats module of Dovecot (2.2.26.0 (23d1de6)) > Looks like there no statistics under FreeBSD. > Server isn’t busy yet but got at least a few connection open. See if there are any errors

Dovecot Issues on FreeBSD 10.3 and FreebSD 11.0

Hello everyone. I see we are having issues with dovecot 2.226.0 in the FreeBSD world. I did run dovecot-2.2.26.rc1 myself and did not see repeat problem in POP3 or IMAP issue customers were reporting. I see this repeat issue in dovecot 2.26.0 either port or compiled similarly. So the question

Re: doveadm index: can't index a different namespace?

Anything else I can provide ?  Sent from my Sprint Samsung Galaxy S7. Original message From: Larry Rosenman Date: 11/1/16 1:37 PM (GMT-06:00) To: Aki Tuomi Cc: Dovecot Mailing List Subject: Re: doveadm index:

Re: v2.2.26.0 released

Thank you. Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Michael A. Peters <'mpet...@domblogger.net'> wrote: Standard way to fix it (on the LibreSSL page) is to check for LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER - e.g. the patch attached which I think catches them all where needed. Note the word

Re: v2.2.26.0 released

If the standard way works, I am happy to include the original patch I sent, amended so that it checks for presence of LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER. If they keep this promise, then we should have no worries about things breaking up. Aki On 02.11.2016 14:24, Michael A. Peters wrote: Indeed, which

Re: v2.2.26.0 released

Indeed, which is why I use it. But it also is in the minority which is why I find it acceptable for FLOSS projects like dovecot to elect to only un-officially support LibreSSL via a community maintained patch. One of the reasons why OpenSSL was forked is because they were trying to support

Re: Outlook 2010 woes

On Tue, 1 Nov 2016 18:20:14 -0500 Bryan Holloway wrote: > In case anyone is interested, we finally found the problem: > > The new (2.2) server had "auth_mechanisms" of "digest-md5" enabled > along with "plain". This is what was causing the four-second delay, > but only with

Re: v2.2.26.0 released

libressl is a leaner and safer openssl Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Michael A. Peters <'mpet...@domblogger.net'> wrote: IMHO it would be acceptable to have a LibreSSL patch that is maintained by the people who want it. It's free software, and that kind of is

Re: v2.2.26.0 released

IMHO it would be acceptable to have a LibreSSL patch that is maintained by the people who want it. It's free software, and that kind of is the point of Open Source. On 11/02/2016 04:36 AM, Michael A. Peters wrote: They have stated they are going to remain API compatible with 1.0.1h (or g,

Re: v2.2.26.0 released

They have stated they are going to remain API compatible with 1.0.1h (or g, forget which they forked) - their new stuff is outside of libcrypto. On 11/02/2016 04:25 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: It does work today, I am just bit worried that it will keep on breaking with libressl as they evolve their

Re: Α compilation problem exists with Sun studio 12

On 02.11.2016 13:30, Limperis Antonis wrote: Hello, I tried to compile Dovecot 2.2.26.0 with Sun Studio 12.0 on a Sun Solaris 10 x86 machine, but an error occurred related to src/lib-ldap/ldap-compare.c. "ldap-compare.c", line 112: void function cannot return value cc: acomp failed for

Α compilation problem exists with Sun studio 12

Hello, I tried to compile Dovecot 2.2.26.0 with Sun Studio 12.0 on a Sun Solaris 10 x86 machine, but an error occurred related to src/lib-ldap/ldap-compare.c. "ldap-compare.c", line 112: void function cannot return value cc: acomp failed for ldap-compare.c *** Error code 1 make: Fatal

Re: v2.2.26.0 released

It does work today, I am just bit worried that it will keep on breaking with libressl as they evolve their API. I would personally like to avoid more ifdef hell if possible... Aki On 02.11.2016 13:22, Michael A. Peters wrote: Standard way to fix it (on the LibreSSL page) is to check for

Re: v2.2.26.0 released

Standard way to fix it (on the LibreSSL page) is to check for LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER - e.g. the patch attached which I think catches them all where needed. Note the word think. It certainly appears to be working anyway with it. On 11/02/2016 04:07 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: After doing some

Re: v2.2.26.0 released

After doing some testing by myself, I noticed that libressl, for some unknown reason, defines #define OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER0x2000L No idea why they decided to advertise that they are OpenSSL v2.0.0. A local fix, if you need one, is to use #if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER == 0x2000L

Re: v2.2.26.0 released

Hi! Those are used if #if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER >= 0x1010L So (your) libressl is providing this define. We compile our code using GCC and CLANG regularly, with OpenSSL v1.0.x which is the currently officially supported one. Aki On 02.11.2016 12:34, Ruga wrote: dovecot 2.2.26.0 uses

Re: v2.2.26.0 released

dovecot 2.2.26.0 uses the following functions, which are not available on libressl 2.4.3: HMAC_CTX_new HMAC_CTX_free EVP_PKEY_get0_EC_KEY EVP_PKEY_get0_RSA OBJ_length EVP_MD_CTX_new EVP_MD_CTX_free The result of calling a non-existent function is a runtime error, and we do not want that on

Re: Dovecot 2 LDAP "unknown user"

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 1 Nov 2016, Peter Fraser wrote: root@BSD-11:/usr/local/etc/dovecot # doveadm auth test username Password: passdb: user auth succeeded extra fields: user=username root@BSD-11:/usr/local/etc/dovecot # But when I run telnet 127.0.0.1 110 and