Re: Rebuild UIDs for mdbox

2016-11-27 Thread @lbutlr
On Nov 27, 2016, at 1:41 PM, Darac Marjal wrote: > Firstly, that page states that UIDs should be 32-bit integers. If so, > why do there appear to be UIDs greater than 3 billion in the mailbox? Because 32 bits hold 4 billion decimal? 2^32 = 4,294,967,296 (this is why FAT32 has a 4GB file size li

Re: JMAP support in Dovecot

2016-11-27 Thread WJCarpenter
Bron Gondwana wrote on 11/27/2016 02:25 PM: The demo proxy was a pretty quick hack and isn't very efficient, but it should be working. It does a fairly slow background import for existing accounts, so I'd recommend using small tests accounts. What particular bit is broken for you? (apart from t

Re: JMAP support in Dovecot

2016-11-27 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Sun, 27 Nov 2016, at 06:07, WJCarpenter wrote: > I don't know the answer to that question, but I am curious about > something. What client are you thinking about using with JMAP? I haven't > found much. (And much of the demo stuff at jmap.io seems to be busted in > various ways.) The demo

Rebuild UIDs for mdbox

2016-11-27 Thread Darac Marjal
Hello all, I think I'm hitting an issue with overly large UIDs in one of my mailboxes. I initially thought it was a problem with claws-mail hitting an infinite loop. Claws-mail /seems/ to work fine, until it gets to this one mailbox, wherein the following is logged: [20:23:04] IMAP> 86 SELECT Lo

Re: JMAP support in Dovecot

2016-11-27 Thread Aki Tuomi
Hi! We are working on including JMAP support to Dovecot. At this moment I cannot give any promise for exact version, but hopefully it will be part of v2.3 Aki Tuomi Dovecot Oy > On November 26, 2016 at 11:17 PM Andrew Jones wrote: > > > Hi Marcus > > Thanks for your helpful reply. > > Do