Re: CentOS 7

Thanks Alexey! Worked a charm. On 12/4/2016 12:29 AM, Alexey Asemov (Alex/AT) wrote: Hello Eric, For me, aclocal --install -I m4 preparation step helps and seems to be correct. Certain autoconf version scripts perform this step later than needed.

Re: CentOS 7

Hello Eric, For me, aclocal --install -I m4 preparation step helps and seems to be correct. Certain autoconf version scripts perform this step later than needed.

CentOS 7

Hello List, I'm building a dovecot-2.2.27 RPM for CentOS 7 and running into some issues The dovecot.spec (http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/dovecot.git/tree/dovecot.spec) file runs 'autoreconf -I . -fiv' for aarch64 support just before the %configure option but is failing This

Re: RES: RES: RES: v2.2.27 released

Oh, you have no openssl-devel installed. Looks like the build is broken if trying to build without OpenSSL. I wonder if this is worth the effort to create a fixed release.. Nobody really should be building without OpenSSL nowadays anyway, but the error message is a bit confusing. > On 4 Dec

RES: RES: RES: v2.2.27 released

This happens on configure, I only ran ./configure. This error is logged to stderr: [root@host1 dovecot]# wget https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.27.tar.gz [root@host1 dovecot]# tar xzf dovecot-2.2.27.tar.gz [root@host1 dovecot]# cd dovecot-2.2.27 [root@host1 dovecot-2.2.27]#

Re: RES: RES: v2.2.27 released

I don't see it, and can't really think of a good reason why it would happen. This happens in configure? And the first thing you ran was configure, right? No autogen.sh or autoconf/automake? -bash-4.1# cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 6.8 (Final) -bash-4.1# uname -a Linux

RES: RES: v2.2.27 released

>From tarball distribution: https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.27.tar.gz Ricardo -Mensagem original- De: Aki Tuomi [mailto:aki.tu...@dovecot.fi] Enviada em: sábado, 3 de dezembro de 2016 19:43 Para: Dovecot Mailing List ; Ricardo Machini

Re: Simple way to get mailbox size by folder.

> On December 3, 2016 at 11:16 PM Vijay Sarvepalli wrote: > > > Is there a simple way to get each mailbox size using dovecot's IMAP > interface? The GETQUOTAROOT and GETQUOTA seems to work with the full > maildir size and not the individual folders. > > I am finding a

Re: RES: v2.2.27 released

> On December 3, 2016 at 11:20 PM Ricardo Machini > wrote: > > > Helo Timo, > > I tried to compile and got one error on Centos 6.8: > > checking that generated files are newer than configure... done > configure: error: conditional "SSL_VERSION_GE_102" was never

Re: CVE-2016-8652 in dovecot

> On December 3, 2016 at 11:00 PM "Jeremiah C. Foster" > wrote: > > > On Sat, 2016-12-03 at 21:25 +0200, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > > On December 3, 2016 at 9:11 PM "Jeremiah C. Foster" > > iahfoster.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 2016-12-03 at 12:23

RES: v2.2.27 released

Helo Timo, I tried to compile and got one error on Centos 6.8: checking that generated files are newer than configure... done configure: error: conditional "SSL_VERSION_GE_102" was never defined. Usually this means the macro was only invoked conditionally. # configure ./configure with-ldap=yes

Simple way to get mailbox size by folder.

Is there a simple way to get each mailbox size using dovecot's IMAP interface? The GETQUOTAROOT and GETQUOTA seems to work with the full maildir size and not the individual folders. I am finding a simple way for the webmail client to show usage of each folder. Thanks Vijay

Re: CVE-2016-8652 in dovecot

On Sat, 2016-12-03 at 21:25 +0200, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > On December 3, 2016 at 9:11 PM "Jeremiah C. Foster" > iahfoster.com> wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2016-12-03 at 12:23 +1000, Noel Butler wrote: > > > On 03/12/2016 12:08, Jeremiah C. Foster wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri,

Re: CVE-2016-8652 in dovecot

> On December 3, 2016 at 9:11 PM "Jeremiah C. Foster" > wrote: > > > On Sat, 2016-12-03 at 12:23 +1000, Noel Butler wrote: > > On 03/12/2016 12:08, Jeremiah C. Foster wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 2016-12-02 at 10:48 +0200, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > > On 02.12.2016 10:45,

Re: CVE-2016-8652 in dovecot

On Sat, 2016-12-03 at 12:23 +1000, Noel Butler wrote: > On 03/12/2016 12:08, Jeremiah C. Foster wrote: > > > On Fri, 2016-12-02 at 10:48 +0200, Aki Tuomi wrote:  > > On 02.12.2016 10:45, Jonas Wielicki wrote: On Freitag, 2. Dezember > > 2016 09:00:58 CET Aki Tuomi wrote: We are sorry to report

Re: SAML | Input buffer full (no auth attempts in 0 secs)

On 3 Dec 2016, at 20.47, mj wrote: > > Hi, > > In my journey to enable SAML auth for our webmail (sogo.nu) I have > created a password-less dovecot imap listener on 127.0.0.1/32, so that > once a user is SAML authenticated for the SOGo webmail, SOGo can connect to >

SAML | Input buffer full (no auth attempts in 0 secs)

Hi, In my journey to enable SAML auth for our webmail (sogo.nu) I have created a password-less dovecot imap listener on 127.0.0.1/32, so that once a user is SAML authenticated for the SOGo webmail, SOGo can connect to dovecot on 127.0.0.1:143 with something like "01 LOGIN username

[Dovecot-news] v2.2.27 released

https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.27.tar.gz https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.27.tar.gz.sig Note that the download URLs are now https with a certificate from Let's Encrypt. * dovecot.list.index.log rotation sizes/times were changed so that the .log file stays smaller