> On 22 Sep 2017, at 00:15, Adi Pircalabu wrote:
>
> Using rsync should be fine, I've done it myself recently several times. What
> you need to consider:
> 1. The downtime required during the final incremental transfer.
> 2. If you're using the same uid/gid on the destination
On 22-09-2017 4:34, Stroller wrote:
[...]
I think my main question is whether there's any reason I shouldn't
just rsync the maildirs across from the old mail server to the new
one?
There aren't many clients using this server, so I don't care if
clients have to redownload all their messages (in
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 07:34:47PM +0100, Stroller wrote:
> I apologise, because I'm sure this subject has been done to death, but I want
> to migrate from Courier to Dovecot.
currently, I'm working on the same project here,
> I think my main question is whether there's any reason I
Am 21.09.2017 um 20:34 schrieb Stroller:
> I apologise, because I'm sure this subject has been done to death, but I want
> to migrate from Courier to Dovecot.
>
> I think my main question is whether there's any reason I shouldn't just rsync
> the maildirs across from the old mail server to the
I apologise, because I'm sure this subject has been done to death, but I want
to migrate from Courier to Dovecot.
I think my main question is whether there's any reason I shouldn't just rsync
the maildirs across from the old mail server to the new one?
There aren't many clients using this
answer is not yet. we are going to implement it when we get free resources to
do it.
---Aki TuomiDovecot oy
Original message From: Steinar Bang Date:
21/09/2017 17:28 (GMT+02:00) To: dovecot@dovecot.org Subject: Re: JMAP
support in Dovecot
> Aki Tuomi
> Aki Tuomi :
> We are working on including JMAP support to Dovecot. At this moment I
> cannot give any promise for exact version, but hopefully it will be
> part of v2.3
Any updates on jmap support in dovecot?
I tried searching the git repo for "jmap" yesterday, so
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo upstream
[Forwarding this to the Dovecot mailing list, just in case someone can help]
Hi,
Thanks for the report! See my comments inline.
On 11:56 Thu 21 Sep , Thurgood Angelou wrote:
> Package: dovecot-core
> Version: 1:2.2.32-2
>
> I've just discovered a bug
https://wiki.dovecot.org/Upgrading/2.2
Aki
On 21.09.2017 14:30, Siarhei Chystsiakou wrote:
> This patch is not valid for dovecot 2.1.17 :(
> Will my config (dovecot 2.1.17) be suitable for the dovecot => 2.2.19 ?
> Thanks
>
> 2017-09-21 12:05 GMT+02:00 Aki Tuomi :
>
>>
This patch is not valid for dovecot 2.1.17 :(
Will my config (dovecot 2.1.17) be suitable for the dovecot => 2.2.19 ?
Thanks
2017-09-21 12:05 GMT+02:00 Aki Tuomi :
> Probably, it's a small change. =)
>
> Aki
>
>
> On 21.09.2017 13:01, Siarhei Chystsiakou wrote:
> > Can I
Probably, it's a small change. =)
Aki
On 21.09.2017 13:01, Siarhei Chystsiakou wrote:
> Can I used the patch on dovecot 2.1.17 ?
>
> 2017-09-21 11:17 GMT+02:00 Aki Tuomi :
>
>>
>> On 20.09.2017 12:51, Siarhei Chystsiakou wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>> I'm trying to set fts plugin
Can I used the patch on dovecot 2.1.17 ?
2017-09-21 11:17 GMT+02:00 Aki Tuomi :
>
>
> On 20.09.2017 12:51, Siarhei Chystsiakou wrote:
> > Hello.
> > I'm trying to set fts plugin for working with Apache Solr 6.6.1, but
> after
> > the setting I get the following error
>
On 20.09.2017 12:51, Siarhei Chystsiakou wrote:
> Hello.
> I'm trying to set fts plugin for working with Apache Solr 6.6.1, but after
> the setting I get the following error
>
> o.a.s.h.RequestHandlerBase org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Bad
> contentType for search handler :text/xml
>
On 21.09.2017 00:56, absolutely_f...@libero.it wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using dovecot 2.0.9 (official CentOS rpm), I am experiencing very high
> load issue.
>
> I think it is something related to my storage (/var/spool is about 3 TB and
> it is almost full).
>
> I noticed those kind of messages
14 matches
Mail list logo