On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 16:42:15 +0100 mj wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Not much time to reply now.
>
> On 12/05/2017 05:21 AM, Mark Foley wrote:
> > mj - thanks! That the first useful example I've received from any
> > forum/list. I'm getting ready
> > to try my config (have to do so after hours), but I have som
Hi,
Not much time to reply now.
On 12/05/2017 05:21 AM, Mark Foley wrote:
mj - thanks! That the first useful example I've received from any forum/list.
I'm getting ready
to try my config (have to do so after hours), but I have some probably
simple-minded questions:
Well, that looks as if you
Il 05/12/2017 12:53, Stroller ha scritto:
The wiki says:
Each mailbox has its own separate index files. **If the index files are
disabled**, the same structures are still kept in the memory, except cache file
is disabled completely (because the client probably won't fetch the same data
twice
On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 11:53:45 +
Stroller wrote:
> The wiki says:
>
> > Each mailbox has its own separate index files. **If the index files
> > are disabled**, the same structures are still kept in the memory,
> > except cache file is disabled completely (because the client
> > probably won't f
On ter, 05 dez 2017, Stroller wrote:
The wiki says:
I tend to grep my maildirs quite often, and use the output to cp
emails to other folders, so it's annoying when the
dovecot.index.cache files show up in the results.
How do I disable the index files, please?
grep --exclude='*index*'
The wiki says:
> Each mailbox has its own separate index files. **If the index files are
> disabled**, the same structures are still kept in the memory, except cache
> file is disabled completely (because the client probably won't fetch the same
> data twice within a connection). [1]
I tend to
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 8:54 AM, Sami Ketola wrote:
>
> Can't really do DNS change to test with one user as DNS change affects all
> users.
Yes, of course. For test purposes one could justchange the system's host
file and simulate a DNS change, after imapsync is complete
I meant a simple test ju
We migrated 36 TB of mail (65K users) from Sun Messaging to Dovecot
using Imapsync, worked like a charm.
Regards
María
On 04/12/17 23:15, Steve Litt wrote:
On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 12:53:15 -0800 (PST)
Joseph Tam wrote:
"Davide Marchi" writes:
UW-IMAP's mailutil, imapsync, YippieMove and Larch.
Whatever you use, *don't* use UW-IMAP's mailutil unless you got lots
of time to kill. It is dreadfully slow -- I used
> On 5 Dec 2017, at 12.46, Webert de Souza Lima wrote:
>
> Sorry, I might be wrong about cache invalidation, indeed. What I'm sure is
> that users will hardly notice any server change.
> We've never had user complaints about mailboxes resyncing or anything like
> that after imapsync'ing to a new
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:16 AM, Sami Ketola wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Sami Ketola
> wrote:
>
>>
>> With every other tool you will face end users needing to invalidate
>> their local caches and
>> redownloading all headers if not also all mail bodies.
>>
>> Sami
>>
>> > On 4 Dec
On 05.12.2017 08:05, Mark Foley wrote:
> I am using Active directory authentication via gssapi for most users. In
> dovecot.conf I have:
>
> auth_mechanisms = plain login gssapi
> auth_use_winbind = yes
>
> I also have
>
> passdb { driver = shadow }
> userdb { driver = passwd }
>
> for those fe
> On 5 Dec 2017, at 10.20, Paolo wrote:
>
> Il 04/12/2017 17:37, Michael Slusarz ha scritto:
>>> I think Davide was asking about dsync. If so, the answer is no: dsync
>>> works only when both servers are Dovecot and needs some additional
>>> configuration to work through the network (see
>>> htt
Il 04/12/2017 17:37, Michael Slusarz ha scritto:
I think Davide was asking about dsync. If so, the answer is no: dsync
works only when both servers are Dovecot and needs some additional
configuration to work through the network (see
https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Replication).
This is entirely incorr
14 matches
Mail list logo
