Re: Is the Doveadm HTTP API considered stable for production use?

2018-08-23 Thread James Beck
Thanks all for the responses! It sounds safe to use so I'll give it a go :) The reason for using the API is that I'm managing replication pairs behind director, on their own private LAN, and I want to be able to have a single place I can connect in to to query them. I'm hoping this idea will make

Re: Is the Doveadm HTTP API considered stable for production use?

2018-08-23 Thread Felipe Gasper
> On Aug 23, 2018, at 8:44 AM, Reio Remma wrote: > > On 23.08.18 15:35, Felipe Gasper wrote: >> >>> On Aug 23, 2018, at 8:14 AM, James Beck wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 09:54:44AM -0400, Felipe Gasper wrote: If you don’t want to use the HTTP API, you can use the raw doveadm

Re: allow_nets based on RBL

2018-08-23 Thread Aki Tuomi
or you could use auth lua to implement this first and see if it makes any sense? ---Aki TuomiDovecot oy Original message From: Tom Sommer Date: 23/08/2018 17:16 (GMT+02:00) To: Dovecot list Subject: allow_nets based on RBL This was brought up in 2014, and left without conc

Re: Is the Doveadm HTTP API considered stable for production use?

2018-08-23 Thread Sami Ketola
> On 22 Aug 2018, at 18.55, James Beck wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm running 2.2.34 in production (installed from Debian stretch > backports) and want to rework some scripts. Can the HTTP API be > considered stable in 2.2.34 please? The wiki says it is "considered > experimental in v2.2.22" so I tho

Re: Is the Doveadm HTTP API considered stable for production use?

2018-08-23 Thread Tom Sommer
On 2018-08-22 11:55, James Beck wrote: Hi, I'm running 2.2.34 in production (installed from Debian stretch backports) and want to rework some scripts. Can the HTTP API be considered stable in 2.2.34 please? I use it in 2.3 and it works just fine :) I might have used it in 2.2 as well, I'm not

allow_nets based on RBL

2018-08-23 Thread Tom Sommer
This was brought up in 2014, and left without conclusion, so I thought it would be time to bump it :) I would love a way to do allow_nets based on an RBL check, could this be added to the feature-list? https://wiki2.dovecot.org/PasswordDatabase/ExtraFields/AllowNets Thanks -- Tom

Re: Is the Doveadm HTTP API considered stable for production use?

2018-08-23 Thread Reio Remma
On 23.08.18 15:35, Felipe Gasper wrote: On Aug 23, 2018, at 8:14 AM, James Beck wrote: On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 09:54:44AM -0400, Felipe Gasper wrote: If you don’t want to use the HTTP API, you can use the raw doveadm protocol. https://wiki.dovecot.org/Design/DoveadmProtocol -FG Thanks, I

Re: Is the Doveadm HTTP API considered stable for production use?

2018-08-23 Thread Felipe Gasper
> On Aug 23, 2018, at 8:14 AM, James Beck wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 09:54:44AM -0400, Felipe Gasper wrote: >> If you don’t want to use the HTTP API, you can use the raw doveadm protocol. >> >> https://wiki.dovecot.org/Design/DoveadmProtocol >> >> -FG > > Thanks, I didn't know abou

Re: Is the Doveadm HTTP API considered stable for production use?

2018-08-23 Thread James Beck
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 09:54:44AM -0400, Felipe Gasper wrote: > If you don’t want to use the HTTP API, you can use the raw doveadm protocol. > > https://wiki.dovecot.org/Design/DoveadmProtocol > > -FG Thanks, I didn't know about that. I suppose testing the HTTP API and then switching to the raw

Re: lmtp Panic Buffer write out of range

2018-08-23 Thread Stephan Bosch
Op 23-8-2018 om 8:16 schreef Gabriele Nencioni: On 08/22/2018 04:03 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote: Op 21-8-2018 om 14:57 schreef Gabriele Nencioni: Hi all, as described here: https://www.dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2018-July/112173.html we are experiencing the same error on dovecot version 2.3.