Re: [ext] 2.3.7 slower than 2.3.6?

On 15 Jul 2019, at 23.17, Ralf Hildebrandt via dovecot wrote: > > * Ralf Hildebrandt via dovecot : >> We're using dovecot (via LMTP) as a backup for all incoming mail. >> >> I upgraded from 2.3.6 to 2.3.7 on the 12th: >> 2019-07-12 14:35:44 upgrade dovecot-imapd:amd64 2:2.3.6-2~bionic >> 2:2.3

Unexpected result from LIST EXTENDED command

I am executing this command below to dovecot-2.3.5-6.cp1178.x86_64 server Notice that some status responses are missing (For folders INBOX.Archive, INBOX.spam.&-BD0EOQQ9BDkEPQ-). I wonder If this is a bug or working as expected In rfc5819 there is this: If the server runs into unexpected proble

Re: pigeonhole question: filtering on delivered-to in case of fetchmail

On 15 Jul 2019, at 18:11, Trever L. Adams via dovecot wrote: > So, one of the problems I am seeing is that people are trying to fake > users into revealing information by sending from an outside domain but > with an internal reply to address and claiming to be administration, IT > or what not. Y

pigeonhole question: filtering on delivered-to in case of fetchmail

So, one of the problems I am seeing is that people are trying to fake users into revealing information by sending from an outside domain but with an internal reply to address and claiming to be administration, IT or what not. I can set up something that will reject if from is outside the domain by

Replication Upgrade 2.2 -> 2.3 Question

Finally getting around to upgrading my setup to 2.3.x. All of our front end proxies are fine on 2.3 connecting to a 2.2 backend storage pair. So the question is, if I stage the upgrade, will it break replication between the two backend storage servers? My thought was to upgrade one to 2.3, and k

Listing expunged messages

Hello, Following on my last question about broken mdboxes, removing dovecot.map.log and force-resync does work. My last problem now however is that after doing this, messages which were 'deleted' previously, come back in the inbox as new messages. I have the original mailboxes and can subsc

Re: [ext] 2.3.7 slower than 2.3.6?

* Ralf Hildebrandt via dovecot : > We're using dovecot (via LMTP) as a backup for all incoming mail. > > I upgraded from 2.3.6 to 2.3.7 on the 12th: > 2019-07-12 14:35:44 upgrade dovecot-imapd:amd64 2:2.3.6-2~bionic > 2:2.3.7-8~bionic > > and it seems that 2.3.7 is slower than 2.3.6 -- mail to t

Weird response to LIST EXTENDED

Hello, I was discussing weird response from Dovecot on Mailkit (this is client IMAP C# library) github page. We concluded that this is a bug in Dovecot server but I wanted to double check with you. Here are the details about the issue https://github.com/jstedfast/MailKit/issues/879 Sent with O

Re: Authdb NSS module

Dovecot can do cached ldap queries too. NSS module isn't going to do a comeback, sorry.  Aki On 15/07/2019 16:51 Eugene Bright wrote: I use LDAP right now, but local cached sssd queries are much faster and reliable.

Re: Error: o_stream_send_istream and Disconnected in APPEND

Il 11/07/19 23:31, Timo Sirainen ha scritto: On 11 Jul 2019, at 10.13, Alessio Cecchi via dovecot mailto:dovecot@dovecot.org>> wrote: Hi, I'm running some Dovecot servers configured with LVS + Director + Backend + NFS and version 2.2.36.3 (a7d78f5a2). In the last days I see an increased nu

Re: Authdb NSS module

I use LDAP right now, but local cached sssd queries are much faster and reliable. On July 15, 2019 6:49:18 AM GMT+03:00, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > >On 15/07/2019 02:54 Eugene via dovecot < dovecot@dovecot.org> wrote: > > > >Hello! > > >Upgrading manual tells that authdb [NSS module was removed][1]

2.3.7 slower than 2.3.6?

We're using dovecot (via LMTP) as a backup for all incoming mail. I upgraded from 2.3.6 to 2.3.7 on the 12th: 2019-07-12 14:35:44 upgrade dovecot-imapd:amd64 2:2.3.6-2~bionic 2:2.3.7-8~bionic and it seems that 2.3.7 is slower than 2.3.6 -- mail to the backup IMAP box is suddenly taking quite som

Re: Sieve problem with duplicate and fileinto in the same set of rules

Il 15/07/19 14:34, Gianluca Scaglia via dovecot ha scritto: Hi there, on my mail server (postfix, dovecot 2.2.27 in Debian 9) I have an automatic forwarding (with sender_bcc_maps in Postfix) for all the emails sent in smtp from the same server, that are then put in the Sent folder with a sie

Sieve problem with duplicate and fileinto in the same set of rules

Hi there, on my mail server (postfix, dovecot 2.2.27 in Debian 9) I have an automatic forwarding (with sender_bcc_maps in Postfix) for all the emails sent in smtp from the same server, that are then put in the Sent folder with a sieve rule. In this way, however, when a user sends an e-mail to

Re: Error since Dovecot v2.3.7

Hi, > On 15. Jul 2019, at 10:59, Timo Sirainen wrote: > > On 15 Jul 2019, at 10.58, Paul Hecker via dovecot wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> since upgrading to Dovecot 2.3.7 I get the following new errors: > > What was the old version? Did you upgrade your kernel as well? It was 2.3.6. But you are tr

Re: Error since Dovecot v2.3.7

On 15 Jul 2019, at 10.58, Paul Hecker via dovecot wrote: > > Hi, > > since upgrading to Dovecot 2.3.7 I get the following new errors: What was the old version? Did you upgrade your kernel as well? > 2019-07-15 09:10:52 mail dovecot: > imap(p...@iwascoding.com)<32484>: Error: file_lock_free()

Error since Dovecot v2.3.7

Hi, since upgrading to Dovecot 2.3.7 I get the following new errors: 2019-07-15 09:10:52 mail dovecot: imap(p...@iwascoding.com)<32484>: Error: file_lock_free(): Unexpectedly failed to retry locking /var/spool/mail/iwascoding/paul/mdbox/mailboxes/INBOX/dbox-Mails/dovecot-vsize.lock: fcntl(/

Re: broken mdboxes

On 7/14/19 11:30 PM, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote: >> Try with one mailbox first. >> >> Delete dovecot.index.map files and run force-resync. >> >> --- >> Aki Tuomi > > Sorry I ment dovecot.map.index there Hey, that seemed to work! I'll need to do more testing because I still have those false md