Is the following "legal" for Dovecot? And...is this separation
recommended or a bad idea? Particularly I'm asking about the "archives"
namespace - I haven't actually implemented this yet and I'm checking
before I break something.
10-mail.conf
# Primary private namespace
# Using sdbox for stor
Hi List,
after upgrading dovecot from version 2.2.33.2 to 2.3.7.2 I got a lot of error
messages like the following if the process count of imap processes reaches
nearly 1000 (~950 (there are a few pop-connections)).
Sep 5 11:27:32 mailbox1 dovecot: imap-login: Internal login failure (pid=27728
On 9/4/19 2:12 PM, Peter Mogensen wrote:
>
> So... I've done some testing.
>
> One method which seemed to work - at least for primitive cases - was to:
>
> * Mount the ALT storage on the destination.
> * Run "doveadm force-resync \*" on the destination.
> (putting all the mails in ALT stora
> On 4 Sep 2019, at 19.32, R.N.S. via dovecot wrote:
>
>
> So now all passdbs are inside protocol.
Which is not what I said.
>
> Errors:
>
> -
> Sep 4 18:25:19 mx dovecot: auth: Fatal: No passdbs specified in
> confi
