On 9/9/19 6:18 PM, @lbutlr via dovecot wrote:
> On 9 Sep 2019, at 09:27, Niels Kobschätzki wrote:
>> The moment I remove those folders, the size gets calculated correctly.
>> Unfortunately those folders are generated by some clients automatically
>> afaik (like .INBOX.Trash)
>> That sounds like
On Sat, 7 Sep 2019, Remo Mattei wrote:
Thanks Michael I will check with the free cert lets encrypt to test it.
If all your certificate subjects are domains under your control,
such as when they are aliases of each other (e.g. smtp.domain.tld,
pop3.domain.tld, imap.domain.tld,
> I migrated our mail infrastructure to Dovecot on Ubuntu 18.04 some months
> ago. It works fine, but recently some users told me that they sometime
> receive duplicated emails. Same email content, same headers including
> message-id.
>
> I'm using two dovecot servers on two sites. Both
On 9 Sep 2019, at 10:08, Francis wrote:
> Where should I look to diagnostic this issue?
Look at the raw stored messages. Your MTA probably has an internal ID (queuid
in postfix) that should tell you if the messages are getting duped before they
get to dovecot.
the raw messages should have
On 9 Sep 2019, at 09:27, Niels Kobschätzki wrote:
> The moment I remove those folders, the size gets calculated correctly.
> Unfortunately those folders are generated by some clients automatically afaik
> (like .INBOX.Trash)
That sounds like a misconfiguration of the IMAP client. Someone has
Hello,
I migrated our mail infrastructure to Dovecot on Ubuntu 18.04 some months
ago. It works fine, but recently some users told me that they sometime
receive duplicated emails. Same email content, same headers including
message-id.
I'm using two dovecot servers on two sites. Both server are in
Hi,
we just upgraded on FreeBSD (11.2-p14) from Dovecot 2.2 to Dovecot
2.3.7.2 and now we have kind of a big problem: the quota-plugin does not
work correctly anymore. If a user has a subfolder of the INBOX (like
.INBOX.foobar) the quota-calculation does not work anymore. It seems to
be arbitrary
Am 09.09.19 um 15:58 schrieb Sami Ketola:
On 9 Sep 2019, at 16.17, Philipp Faeustlin via dovecot
wrote:
It is not recommended to rely on local-part case, but it is indeed
case-sensitive.
And this is to avoid such issues that postfix supports address
On 9 Sep 2019, at 07:47, James Brown wrote:
> Should I use a Dovecot process, rsync, a Mac app like Arq or Jungle Disk, or
> something else?
I do not have specific experience with using S3, but if rsync is possible that
is always my first choice, though if you want to backup to prevent
> On 9 Sep 2019, at 16.17, Philipp Faeustlin via dovecot
> wrote:
>
>>It is not recommended to rely on local-part case, but it is indeed
>>case-sensitive.
>>And this is to avoid such issues that postfix supports address
>>cleanup/canonicalisation before forwarding mails to
I’d like to synchronise our mail store to an Amazon S3 bucket or similar, for
protection from ransomware.
Server is running on macOS with maildir.
Should I use a Dovecot process, rsync, a Mac app like Arq or Jungle Disk, or
something else?
Anyone have experience or opinions on this?
Thanks,
It is not recommended to rely on local-part case, but it is indeed
case-sensitive.
And this is to avoid such issues that postfix supports address
cleanup/canonicalisation before forwarding mails to dovecot.
--
RFC 5321:
"Local-part = Dot-string /
Hi all,
does the dovecot fixed version: 2.3.7.2, 2.2.36.4 (as the CVE-2019-11500
says) fix the LMTP error "Got unexpected reply" as well?
The LMTP error "Got unexpected reply" is described here:
https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2018-August/112562.html
Nevermind, the indexes were not deleted correctly - the method described
below works :)
---
Tom
On 2019-09-09 09:45, Tom Sommer via dovecot wrote:
Is there a way to force Dovecot to rebuild dovecot-uidlist from zero?
It seems deleting all indexes and dovecot-* files followed by "doveadm
Is there a way to force Dovecot to rebuild dovecot-uidlist from zero?
It seems deleting all indexes and dovecot-* files followed by "doveadm
force-resync" is not enough? It just gets the same UIDs? Perhaps from
Maildir filenames? But I would like to reset the uid of all mails.
Thanks
--
Tom
15 matches
Mail list logo