Re: HIGHESTMODSEQ replication issue

2020-11-04 Thread Gustavo Ajeitos [Office365]
Hi John,     Thank you for your answer! I agree with you, I think you recommendation should solve the problem, it seems the only possible workaround. I have to investigate if it possible and how to accomplish that with the load balancer. Gustavo El 3/11/20 a las 15:27, John Fawcett escribió

Understanding the limitations of Dovecot Submission Service

2020-11-04 Thread R. Diez
Hi all: The Dovecot Submission Service is very enticing for laz... I mean for busy people like me. A couple of lines in dovecot.conf , and you have a local SMTP server that does authentication. No SASL loops to jump through! Very cool people like me also appreciate cool new features like BURL.

Re: HIGHESTMODSEQ replication issue

2020-11-04 Thread John Fawcett
On 04/11/2020 18:33, Gustavo Ajeitos [Office365] wrote: > Hi John, > >     Thank you for your answer! > > I agree with you, I think you recommendation should solve the problem, > it seems the only possible workaround. > I have to investigate if it possible and how to accomplish that with > the load

imap dumping core in libdovecot-storage with assert "(block_count == 0 || block_idx+1 == block_count)"

2020-11-04 Thread Renaud Métrich
Hi, I would like to report an issue which is 100% reproducible with a specific mail available in the reproducer attached to Red Hat's bugzilla (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1726535): 8< 8< --

Re: API support for placing a message for a specific user

2020-11-04 Thread orenyny
Aki,Thank you very much for the detailed information.Do you know if it also allows for placing an attachment inside that message?Thanks again,OrenSent from Samsung Galaxy smartphone. Original message From: Aki Tuomi Date: 11/4/20 1:38 AM (GMT-05:00) To: Oren Yehezkely , dove

Re: vsz_limit

2020-11-04 Thread Joan Moreau
For machines with low memory, I would like to detect how much ram remains available before starting indexing a mail, so I can commit everything on disk before the ram is exhausted (and break the process) I tried to put a "fake" allocation to test if it fails, (so it can fail separately, and I

Re: Panic-Error (ctx->nested_parts_count > 0)

2020-11-04 Thread Aki Tuomi
You should be able to workaround this by enabling fts. Aki > On 04/11/2020 09:22 Andreas Piper wrote: > > > Hello, > > on my dovecot-replicator-backend I see lots of panic-messages "assertion > failed: (ctx->nested_parts_count > 0)", produced from a single user. I > assume that this is cor